I've been using the same brew pot for 10+ years. Most brewing equipment should last a good long while. I might have $2000 invested into equipment after all these years.
Let's say 2 cases of craft beer is $80. I bet 60 beers of Lablatts would be about the same around here. But something like High Life might be $36 or so. If all I drink is High Life I might be losing. But.. If I want craft beer... On the high end I can brew two cases for $40 (includes energy, cleaners, yeast starter, CO2, etc.). Let's say I brew 20 times this year. So I'd save $800. So in two and a half years I'd break even on equipment I've purchased over 10+ years.
It is interesting to think about. I guess I could save even more if I didn't drink at all...
Your numbers are closest to the several variations that I’ve crunched for realistic all inclusive costs. A “normal” brewer that was paying close attention to cost I think could follow your model and and break even in 2 years. Also, I think $2000 for an advanced brewer is pretty realistic. Bottling beer brings your equipment cost way down. I don’t keg but I suspect CO2 could be pretty costly if you force carbed every time. Conversely, if you primed your kegs with sugar, I bet a CO2 tank used only for serving and maintaining carb levels would last quite a while.
Sure, I was illustrating from a reasonable high cost to a reasonable low cost. The low costs on this thread being bandied about don’t include many hidden costs like CO2, Starsan, PBW, electricity for both brewing and fermentation, driving to the LHBS to pick up your stuff or shipping if you have it mailed. Any number of other things that we discount out of hand when we have these discussions. ABV is certainly another variable and it makes it difficult to compare apples to apples.
All I’m saying is what the OP says. If it is solely your intent to save money brewing your then you can do it, but if you do it the regular way, the way most brewers in the hobby are doing it then you aren’t going to be saving any money.
Substantially, going on vacation vs. brewing, you can heavily discount your time and depending how you brew the cost to spend your time could be a savings. But I would submit that for the majority of brewers, the cost of sitting and watching TV is substantially less than brewing. The cost of your time is what a business calls overhead. Leisure time in your life isn’t compulsory and most of us pay dearly for it. It is worth something in actual dollars. If it wasn’t, companies would not provide paid time off as a benefit. Depending on lifestyle, your free time can be worth more or less. I can choose to ignore that I spent money on my credit card, but at some point I have to go back to work to pay for my time off. If cost of leisure time is irrelevant, then we’d all quit our jobs tomorrow. If you live in your mom’s basement, you might have a point.
Again, you're ignoring the fact that the vast majority of people brew during time they would not be earning money anyway. It's not like we'd all be working 90 hour weeks if we weren't brewing, golfing, watching TV etc. There may be some people like that, but the nominal case is a 40 hour work week with the rest of the time available to do what you enjoy. People always have the option to work more hours, or take on a second job. Very few do and I know for me, my free time is much more valuable than the money I'd earn with a second job.
There's an opportunity cost to leisure time to be sure, but for most of us, that "expense" is a given regardless of how we use it. If any given person wants to work more, but doesn't in favor of brewing, the opportunity cost is there as a tangible cost. That would be an extreme minority. The vast majority aren't making that swap.
I know for me, my free time is much more valuable than the money I'd earn with a second job.
I know what you mean. Almost seems like you have to consider that in the cost.
Just because the 40 hour week is the standard doesn’t mean you have to have to work 40. Until recently at my job it was compulsory to work 50. That reduction of my free time put it at a premium and I would have given a substantial amount of overtime to have it back. I know that it’s an abstract concept, but in our leisure time we are being paid anti-money to live, unless you have some other economy like basement troll, dirtbag or river rat. Conversely if you homebrew instead of flying airplanes, yachting, hookers and blow, then you save fistfuls of money.
Your yacht is an aircraft carrier? D@mn, boy!I fly to my yacht then enjoy hookers and blow while I'm brewing!![]()
If you can find it, check out Tank Puncher by ReUnion. They're out of Coralville, IA. Good chit, mang.
On the topic of brewing to save money - I think that if you ONLY drink your own beer and no commercial beer, then you would likely save money, especially if you had a cheap n' easy brew system. But I, like most of us, also like to buy commercial beer to change it up when I'm tired of my own beer. There is no saving money in the hobby of being a beer enthusiast.
I fly to my yacht then enjoy hookers and blow while I'm brewing!![]()
Well I justified my initial expenses to my wife many years ago with the claim that we'd save money. There may have actually been true for a few years early on but I don't even try to sell that BS to her anymore, nor does she care anyway. Just celebrated our 30th anniversary in April.Has it been asked yet...who got into this HOBBY to save money?
Well I justified my initial expenses to my wife many years ago with the claim that we'd save money. There may have actually been true for a few years early on but I don't even try to sell that BS to her anymore, nor does she care anyway. Just celebrated our 30th anniversary in April.
I just paid $10.00 for a glass of Guinness last night at a pizza joint. Nuff said, and they won't be seeing me again.
I don't buy anything but hops in bulk and almost any style is going to cost me under $30 a batch to make and some styles closer to $20. Craft beer costs around $18+ a 12 pack (with deposit) from the big players up here (Deschutes, Hop Valley, Ninkasi, Sierra Nevada, etc.)
If you want to drink beers from breweries that only release bombers that same amount could easily be $30+
My equipment costs are pretty reasonable. I have a nice Spike kettle, a nice burner with leg extensions, I BIAB, and have 5 kegs with the ability to have 4 on tap, a fermentation chamber, etc. Needless to say it's a pretty advanced setup and much more than anyone needs for making beer and all of that cost me probably no more than $1,000.
From my calculations I easily save $15 a gallon compared to buying 12 packs and bombers, even including costs like propane, cleaners, sanitizer, and CO2.
I don't brew beer to save money, I brew beer because I really enjoy it. It's a neat skill to have and a hobby that can be enjoyed by friends and family. However, I think I've definitely gotten to the point where I've broken even which is just an added perk.
If you are paying 18 dollars a twelve pack and saving 15 dollars a gallon making homebrew, then each five gallon batch of beer would cost you $3.75 to make “propane and supplies included”. Do you even math bro?
I'll show my math. Before I stared homebrewing I would usually get a few bombers and a 6 pack every week. That comes out to about a beer every night for my wife and I.
1 batch homebrew = ~5 gallons = $25 therefore ~1 gallon = $5
12 pack = ~1 gallon = $18
6 bombers = ~1 gallon = $30
(1/2 * 12 pack) + (1/2 * 6 bombers) = ~ 1 gallon = $24
Every gallon of beer is ~$19 cheaper - $2 batch for CO2 - $2 batch for propane - $2 batch for cleaners and sanitizers = ~$13 gallon cheaper
If you drink Miller High Life you wont save as much as me but I'm basing this off my personal drinking habits.
This thread makes me want to buy something expensive and shiny!
I agree that a twelve pack is close to a gallon. So are 6 bombers. But they aren’t exactly a gallon and when you adjust the money value using your numbers the cost is $22.43 a gallon, adjusted for the savings is $17.43 adjusted for supplies, the new value is $11.43. $11.43 in my book is not easily $15, but to be fair I think you over estimated supplies. That aside, my point is that the numbers are the numbers and we tend to do the math to fit our feelings and beliefs. Personally, my beer is worth far more to me than the cost to make it, even if I include a nominal amount for my time. I can’t buy my beer at the store. The law of supply and demand would require me to pay quite a lot for my beer. I get about 18 bottles per batch and if I could magically get the learning, fun and other benefits from purchasing my own beer without actually having to make it, I think I would pay 2 dollars a beer or more depending on what I made. Thing is, I can’t tell people that I’m saving money because I homebrew based on how I value my beer. They have to value my beer as much as I do, which in my experience isn’t the case. A lot of the responses talk about making comparable beer to store bought beer. I know a guy who will only drink Coors Light. I think that what draws him to Coors Light is that is is basically unoffensive and the brand fits his image. For that guy, your $5 a gallon beer is far worse than his $7 a gallon beer.
I just paid $10.00 for a glass of Guinness last night at a pizza joint. Nuff said, and they won't be seeing me again.