PostWhen is everyone dry hopping? High krausen or post ferm? I currently have a Belgian IPA going and plan to expand my old neipa recipe into an OH clone. Love OH and need more
PostWhen is everyone dry hopping? High krausen or post ferm? I currently have a Belgian IPA going and plan to expand my old neipa recipe into an OH clone. Love OH and need more
When is everyone dry hopping? High krausen or post ferm? I currently have a Belgian IPA going and plan to expand my old neipa recipe into an OH clone. Love OH and need more
Brewed my second "heavy malted oats" hazyboi this past Wednesday. Made some changes from the first iteration. I dropped the flaked oats completely, dropped the raw wheat, upped the malted oats, and added in a smidge of light munich for color. Here's what I settled on...
49% Malted Oats
40% 2-Row
8% White Wheat
3% Light Munich (~8L)
Mashed at 154
30m Boil
Whirlpool at 180*, 30m (Idaho 7, Mosaic, Citra - with the majority being Idaho 7)
Fermenting with Bootleg's NEEPAH Blend
OG sample looked and smelled great. This is my first time using Idaho 7 and I'm pretty excited about it, especially after reading some stuff from Janish talking about how much he loves whirlpooling Idaho 7. I will report back next week when it's in the keg.
I'm quite new to water adjustments and even more to this beer style, so sorry for the likely dull question, but why are you using such high levels of SO4?The water profile was built from 100% RO.
The final water profile was approximately:
Ca: 100ppm
Mg: 15ppm
Na: 30ppm + a small amount from the kmeta
So4: 275ppm (approx. 250ppm from gypsum & 25ppm from kmeta) Approximately 50ppm of the Ca and 120ppm of the So4 was a boil addition of Gypsum.
Cl: 75
I'm quite new to water adjustments and even more to this beer style, so sorry for the likely dull question, but why are you using such high levels of SO4?
It was my understanding that in order to achieve the creamy mouthfeel high levels of CL and low levels of SO4 where better.
Generally that is the thinking. However, I like the way the SO4 helps the hops pop and the beer to finish “drier”/crisp. With a proper step mash and PH levels, my beers have plenty of body and mouthfeel without the additional chloride.
Let me know how that turns out. I’ve been hesitant to go that high, but I’ve been planning to give it a go at some point.I have a Nelson/Galaxy IPA fermenting now that is ~400 ppm SO4, ~40 Cl. Trying the Alchemist's approach to water. Aiming for fruity + dry.
What was the calculated SRM on that recipe? Looks a tad darker than I would prefer, but could certainly be the lighting.This is my latest creation...
43% Pilsner
26% GP
12% Oat Malt
12% Flaked Oats
2% Honey Malt
Amarillo, Citra, Mosaic, and Grungiest for WP and Dryhop with Omega DIPA yeast. Actually threw in Whirlfloc tablets out of habit.
What was the calculated SRM on that recipe? Looks a tad darker than I would prefer, but could certainly be the lighting.
Also, FWIW, I still whirlfloc these beers. I whirlfloc every single beer I brew.
Glad I am not alone. But I have some buddies, who are damn good brewers, that don't whirlfloc/moss their NEIPAs and it blows my mind. IMHO, these beers should not be hazy due to a bunch of crap (trub, break material, etc.) is in suspension. That's a bad NEIPA.i whirlfloc every Beer I make as well. It doesn’t affect haze one bit.
Not using floc does not mean that stuff stays in suspension throughout the beer. Helps drop in the kettle for sure but I’ve had plenty of beers without floc clear just fineGlad I am not alone. But I have some buddies, who are damn good brewers, that don't whirlfloc/moss their NEIPAs and it blows my mind. IMHO, these beers should not be hazy due to a bunch of crap (trub, break material, etc.) is in suspension. That's a bad NEIPA.
For sure, I totally agree. Enough time and cold conditioning will drop most any beer clear.Not using floc does not mean that stuff stays in suspension throughout the beer. Helps drop in the kettle for sure but I’ve had plenty of beers without floc clear just fine
I'll report back with a picture later. I like this version better than my first. But it still needs a cock hair more color to it, for my preference. I'll probably add a touch of honey malt in addition to the light munich on the next version. Everything else is spot on though. It's just a little green since it just got in the keg.Brewed my second "heavy malted oats" hazyboi this past Wednesday. Made some changes from the first iteration. I dropped the flaked oats completely, dropped the raw wheat, upped the malted oats, and added in a smidge of light munich for color. Here's what I settled on...
49% Malted Oats
40% 2-Row
8% White Wheat
3% Light Munich (~8L)
Mashed at 154
30m Boil
Whirlpool at 180*, 30m (Idaho 7, Mosaic, Citra - with the majority being Idaho 7)
Fermenting with Bootleg's NEEPAH Blend
OG sample looked and smelled great. This is my first time using Idaho 7 and I'm pretty excited about it, especially after reading some stuff from Janish talking about how much he loves whirlpooling Idaho 7. I will report back next week when it's in the keg.
Light Munich is 7L and honey malt is 25L so that’s a huge difference in color contribution, honey malt has 3x’s the ability to change your color verses L. Munich. I get a really nice light orange color with 3% honey maltI'll report back with a picture later. I like this version better than my first. But it still needs a cock hair more color to it, for my preference. I'll probably add a touch of honey malt in addition to the light munich on the next version. Everything else is spot on though. It's just a little green since it just got in the keg.
In some of my earlier NEIPA iterations, I used about 5% light munich and 2% honey malt and nailed the color I wanted. I may drop the munich and just do the honey malt, not sure yet. But also one of the new bulk bags I got is a Rahr 2-row with a significantly higher SRM than the current 2-row and pils that I am using. So I'll just have to wait and see what SRM is spits out when I build the next recipe.Light Munich is 7L and honey malt is 25L so that’s a huge difference in color contribution, honey malt has 3x’s the ability to change your color verses L. Munich. I get a really nice light orange color with 3% honey malt
Gotcha. So the with 5% Munich and 2% honey, your essentiallly getting the same color you would get from 3.5% honey alone. You’ll just have to make the decision if you think you’re actually picking up any Munich character in the beer. If you are and prefer it, than that’s perfect. If you don’t taste any Munich, you might as well just use the smaller percent of honey malt. Just depends really on what you like for your beerIn some of my earlier NEIPA iterations, I used about 5% light munich and 2% honey malt and nailed the color I wanted. I may drop the munich and just do the honey malt, not sure yet. But also one of the new bulk bags I got is a Rahr 2-row with a significantly higher SRM than the current 2-row and pils that I am using. So I'll just have to wait and see what SRM is spits out when I build the next recipe.
That's a really great point I had not considered. Honestly, I don't know that I get much, if any, munich character with everything else going on in the beer. I think I will just go with honey malt, unless I get the calculated SRM I want just from the higher L base malt. Thanks dude!Gotcha. So the with 5% Munich and 2% honey, your essentiallly getting the same color you would get from 3.5% honey alone. You’ll just have to make the decision if you think you’re actually picking up any Munich character in the beer. If you are and prefer it, than that’s perfect. If you don’t taste any Munich, you might as well just use the smaller percent of honey malt. Just depends really on what you like for your beer
I've been able to find some white wheat (raw unmalted, which seems to be quite complicated to find in my place), and was planning to do a grain will quite similar to yours. Never having used it, might I ask what's the purpose of the raw wheat? And do you cook it previously in order to convert the scratch?Brewed my second "heavy malted oats" hazyboi this past Wednesday. Made some changes from the first iteration. I dropped the flaked oats completely, dropped the raw wheat, upped the malted oats, and added in a smidge of light munich for color. Here's what I settled on...
49% Malted Oats
40% 2-Row
8% White Wheat
3% Light Munich (~8L)
Mashed at 154
30m Boil
Whirlpool at 180*, 30m (Idaho 7, Mosaic, Citra - with the majority being Idaho 7)
Fermenting with Bootleg's NEEPAH Blend
OG sample looked and smelled great. This is my first time using Idaho 7 and I'm pretty excited about it, especially after reading some stuff from Janish talking about how much he loves whirlpooling Idaho 7. I will report back next week when it's in the keg.
It’s not “raw” in the sense that it’s not cooked, it’s raw in the fact that it has not been malted. Flaked wheat starts as raw wheat and is then placed through hot rollers. Unmalted wheat or raw wheat has no diastatic power and no enzymes to convert starches to sugars.I've been able to find some white wheat (raw unmalted, which seems to be quite complicated to find in my place), and was planning to do a grain will quite similar to yours. Never having used it, might I ask what's the purpose of the raw wheat? And do you cook it previously in order to convert the scratch?
I was planning to add it to the mash as-is, because I think part of the point of using it is to obtain the scratches instead of the sugars? (or else it could be replaced with flaked wheat?)
Thanks.
I've never done it before, but my understanding is that when using raw grains, is that you need to perform a cereal mash, not a standard infusion. Came across it when researching lambic brewing techniques, which use a good portion of raw wheat.It’s not “raw” in the sense that it’s not cooked, it’s raw in the fact that it has not been malted. Flaked wheat starts as raw wheat and is then placed through hot rollers. Unmalted wheat or raw wheat has no diastatic power and no enzymes to convert starches to sugars.
As long as you are using raw wheat in the mash in combination with base Malts. The enzymes from the base Malts will covert the starches in the raw wheat, so there is nothing to worry about.
People use raw wheat because since it was not malted, it has larger protein chains that can benefit head retention and mouthfeel.
I’ve always been under the impression that as long as you get a good crush and you keep the % of raw wheat low, you can use a infusion mashI've never done it before, but my understanding is that when using raw grains, is that you need to perform a cereal mash, not a standard infusion. Came across it when researching lambic brewing techniques, which use a good portion of raw wheat.
Very possible...lambic is in the 40% raw wheat range I think, but you're right, it should be fine if it's lower. I certainly wouldn't go through all the trouble of a cereal mash if it was just a pound or 2.I’ve always been under the impression that as long as you get a good crush and you keep the % of raw wheat low, you can use a infusion mash
To just be able to drink it or to actually enjoy it in its prime?What’s a typical grain to glass time for this beer? Assuming 1 dry hop addition and 1 day carbing with a stone?