New England IPA "Northeast" style IPA

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
A brewery here did a coffee IPA, and it got mixed reviews.
Many people enjoed the extra little zing it had, coffee beans tend to have a citrus type flavor, which can compliment.

If you decide to use Sauvignon Blanc, be careful, as it will significantly increase the perception of acidity. IMO I wouldn't so this one, unless you've got some form of souring already in there (Lacto) some other type of fruit might be beneficial though?
another local brewery here, adds a number of different fruits to IPA's and they all taste fantastic, without over taking thebase.

Feijoa
Mango
Pineapple
Grapefruit (obvious)
I think He did peaches as well?
Oranges are a good choice as well.
(I've never had it) but someone does or did a coconut IPA awhile back?
Yeah I was thinking of doing the fruit route with either mango or peaches but I like pineapple also. My wife wanted to complain but couldn't because it smelled so good that the whole house was engulfed with a mango/papaya aroma during the first couple days of fermentation. WLP007 is the yeast of choice this time around
 
coffee? that sounds awful! i'd have to taste it to believe it!!!

I did an all Citra coffee milkshake NEIPA last spring and it was fantastic. Lactose, whole wheat flour, etc. Dry hopped it with 8oz Citra and 10oz of whole beans.

9135195399.jpg
 
I did an all Citra coffee milkshake NEIPA last spring and it was fantastic. Lactose, whole wheat flour, etc. Dry hopped it with 8oz Citra and 10oz of whole beans.

9135195399.jpg



Wow!! That looks fantastic!! Would you mind throwing out the recipe for that one?!
 
I just brewed a 10 gallon batch of a NE Style IPA with predominantly Galaxy followed by Citra. I plan on putting it into 2 different kegs. One staying with the original recipe and then adding something to the second keg for a twist on it. I'm hoping to go away from the norm of using a different dry hop and I just tried coffee in my last ne style IPA which was good but now I'm on to something new. I was thinking adding some good Sauvignon Blanc. Any other suggestions?

I did one once where I added in citrus zest and crushed coriander to the boil. You could maybe dry-zest/dry-spice one.
 
Question for the group - how do you deal with (or do you even get), significant hop particles in your NEIPAs?

A few thoughts:

1) Don't dryhop in the keg - it always has led to very murky beer for me if you don't let it sit a pretty long time - try just doing it all in the primary and see if you like it.

2) Try using different varieties of hops once in awhile with this same method. Some don't give as much of that astringent, dry character when they are suspended in the beer. Simcoe, for example, doesn't do that as much as Citra in my experience. What hops did you use by the way? Some hops give a very strong bitterness in dryhop and others don't. The bitterness and astringency/drying are two distinct things in my experience. A recent Centennial IPA I did was super bitter after dryhop, first time I've gotten such a bitter dry hop beer!

3) Let it rest very cold for a few more weeks. It will start to clear. There will be a layer of yeast and hops forming on the bottom of your keg. If you don't suck that up with your setup, you will be good to go. If you keep oxygen out of your process pretty well on the cold side, the beer should taste really hoppy and great for at least 4-6 weeks in the keg, maybe longer.

4) It might help to try a different yeast. I have been toying with using WLP002 to see if it drops out more quickly and still leaves good hop character.

5) I bet the Clear Beer Draught would work well. I'm sure the beer at the top of your keg is much less yeast/hop-particle-laden than the beer at the bottom.
 
Question for the group - how do you deal with (or do you even get), significant hop particles in your NEIPAs? I did a DDH, first stage in the fermenter, second stage in the keg. The second stage DH was 4 or so ounces, so not extreme. I keg DH loose, I have a shortened diptube (like 1/2 gallon or so shortened at least), and have drilled my stainless steel dry hopper and fit this over the dip tube. This has worked pretty well, but I usually end up with hop debris for a little while. This last batch, it is never ending. The biggest issue is this makes the beer painfully astringent and bitter, as you are scraping your tongue with tons of tiny little hop particles. Aroma is amazing but its pretty much undrinkable until it settles, if it does. The irony being, each day it is on the decline as we all know.

I am thinking the Clear Beer Draught system is in my future.

This picture is from a beer that has been kegged and under CO2 for 9 days at about 40 degrees, undisturbed. The picture was taken about 24 hours after it was poured and started to settle. When it comes out of the keg the hop floaties are everywhere. and they are suuuch tiny little flecks. I don't mind the yeast gunk but there is still so much hop junk.

Did you transfer from the DH keg?
What's the mesh size of the dry hopper?
 
Last edited:
I keg DH loose

That right there is your problem. If you must DH in a keg, do it in a mesh bag or something. I have stopped dry hopping in the keg and do it all in the primary with no ill effects.
 
Question for the group - how do you deal with (or do you even get), significant hop particles in your NEIPAs? I did a DDH, first stage in the fermenter, second stage in the keg. The second stage DH was 4 or so ounces, so not extreme. I keg DH loose, I have a shortened diptube (like 1/2 gallon or so shortened at least), and have drilled my stainless steel dry hopper and fit this over the dip tube. This has worked pretty well, but I usually end up with hop debris for a little while. This last batch, it is never ending. The biggest issue is this makes the beer painfully astringent and bitter, as you are scraping your tongue with tons of tiny little hop particles. Aroma is amazing but its pretty much undrinkable until it settles, if it does. The irony being, each day it is on the decline as we all know.

I am thinking the Clear Beer Draught system is in my future.

This picture is from a beer that has been kegged and under CO2 for 9 days at about 40 degrees, undisturbed. The picture was taken about 24 hours after it was poured and started to settle. When it comes out of the keg the hop floaties are everywhere. and they are suuuch tiny little flecks. I don't mind the yeast gunk but there is still so much hop junk.
Here is a shot of how good the Clear Beer Draught system works with these beers - worth every penny!

I kegged this five days ago with 4oz of LOOSE pellets in the keg. I let it sit for three days at room temp, chilled for 24hrs then added 30lbs PSI for about six hours and shaken / rolled vigorously several times during that period, afterwards I dropped the pressure to 12lbs ---- that was 12hrs ago. No yeast, no trub, just the tiniest bit of hop matter still there, but will be gone by tomorrow.

To be fair though the last half gallon or so of the keg will produce the gunk that you are trying to avoid.

IMG_5859.jpg
 
Here is a shot of how good the Clear Beer Draught system works with these beers - worth every penny!

I kegged this five days ago with 4oz of LOOSE pellets in the keg. I let it sit for three days at room temp, chilled for 24hrs then added 30lbs PSI for about six hours and shaken / rolled vigorously several times during that period, afterwards I dropped the pressure to 12lbs ---- that was 12hrs ago. No yeast, no trub, just the tiniest bit of hop matter still there, but will be gone by tomorrow.

To be fair though the last half gallon or so of the keg will produce the gunk that you are trying to avoid.

It's a neat idea, but I would much rather brew an extra half gallon of beer, dry hop in the primary, and get a full 5 gallons of drinkable beer in the keg.
 
Wow!! That looks fantastic!! Would you mind throwing out the recipe for that one?!

Yeah, I'll edit this post with it when I get hop.



FYI: everyone dry hopping in bags, you are better off dry hopping loose! Clear beer draught system is amazing for this. Also supports the idea that loose dry hops add IBU.

http://www.hopsteiner.de/fileadmin/...Method_-_W._Mitter__S._Cocuzza__BBII_2013.pdf


"In the case of linalool, the use of pellets in loose form gives almost 50 per cent more extraction efficiency and, consequently, the likelihood
of a beer with a more intense aroma."

"Nevertheless, the method of hop addition appears to have a clear impact. If pellets are added to the beer in a finely woven, mesh-like container, then the solubility of alpha acid is particularly restricted. Similarly the linalool concentration only attains a considerably lower level."
 
For anyone debating the use of hopstand vs dry hop there was a very thorough investigation done by Rock Bottom Breweries and published under the title: "Maximizing Hop Aroma and Flavor Through Process Variables". I was able to find the entire PDF through a quick google search.

I highly recommend reading it and observing specifically the graphics comparing the results. They tested:
1: Short Hopstand (50 minute postboil residence) 0.5 oz hops per gallon
2: Long Hopstand (80 minute postboil residence) 0.5 oz hops per gallon
3: Half Hopstand/Dry (80 minute postboil residence) 0.25 oz per gallon in hopstand, 0.25 oz per gallon in dry
4: Dry (no hopstand) 0.5 hops per gallon

The results were definite that #3 (half hopstand/half dry) produced the most hop aroma and hop flavor. #4, which was a dry hop only with the same amount of total hops, had equivalent hop aroma but was lacking on the hop flavor. The spider graphics in the article are very telling.

The study was done using commercial equipment, which are different than us homebrewers, but the results really helped me understand what can be accomplished using a specific set of controlled procedures.

I also found the LODO discussion on here interesting, and got me thinking that shaking the carboy for oxygenation, rather than using pure O2 and a diffusion stone may be why some hopstand results suffer.

McT
 
For anyone debating the use of hopstand vs dry hop there was a very thorough investigation done by Rock Bottom Breweries and published under the title: "Maximizing Hop Aroma and Flavor Through Process Variables". I was able to find the entire PDF through a quick google search.

I highly recommend reading it and observing specifically the graphics comparing the results. They tested:
1: Short Hopstand (50 minute postboil residence) 0.5 oz hops per gallon
2: Long Hopstand (80 minute postboil residence) 0.5 oz hops per gallon
3: Half Hopstand/Dry (80 minute postboil residence) 0.25 oz per gallon in hopstand, 0.25 oz per gallon in dry
4: Dry (no hopstand) 0.5 hops per gallon

The results were definite that #3 (half hopstand/half dry) produced the most hop aroma and hop flavor. #4, which was a dry hop only with the same amount of total hops, had equivalent hop aroma but was lacking on the hop flavor. The spider graphics in the article are very telling.

The study was done using commercial equipment, which are different than us homebrewers, but the results really helped me understand what can be accomplished using a specific set of controlled procedures.

I also found the LODO discussion on here interesting, and got me thinking that shaking the carboy for oxygenation, rather than using pure O2 and a diffusion stone may be why some hopstand results suffer.

McT

I still think I'd rather just go with my 2 oz/gallon dry-hop-only in the interest of saving time during brew day. I had forgotten about that study though.

What are you referring to with the shaking vs pure O2? Pure O2 may destroy some of the hopstand character? FWIW, I stopped using oxygen a long time ago and still get the attenuation I like. I just shake my carboys and pitch a large amount of very healthy yeast. Saves time.
 
I still think I'd rather just go with my 2 oz/gallon dry-hop-only in the interest of saving time during brew day. I had forgotten about that study though.

What are you referring to with the shaking vs pure O2? Pure O2 may destroy some of the hopstand character? FWIW, I stopped using oxygen a long time ago and still get the attenuation I like. I just shake my carboys and pitch a large amount of very healthy yeast. Saves time.

LoDO refers to:
1. Oxygen exposure on the hot side that subtly change the malt flavors.
2. Long term oxygen exposure on the cold side. Oxygenating when you are pitching active yeast is not considered detrimental because the yeast quickly (within hours) take up all of the dissolved oxygen. However, racking into a keg after fermenting is complete will result in DO above what is considered acceptable thresholds with just about any set up.
 
LoDO refers to:

1. Oxygen exposure on the hot side that subtly change the malt flavors.

2. Long term oxygen exposure on the cold side. Oxygenating when you are pitching active yeast is not considered detrimental because the yeast quickly (within hours) take up all of the dissolved oxygen. However, racking into a keg after fermenting is complete will result in DO above what is considered acceptable thresholds with just about any set up.


How about racking to a purges keg. Heard what the DO level is from that? Seems to give good results
 
How about racking to a purges keg. Heard what the DO level is from that? Seems to give good results

Yes it's over the limits in even the best purged systems.

From personal experience, i noted an improvement in oxidation flavors (and hop longevity) as my system evolved...

1. Fermenting in buckets for 4 weeks. Racking wide open then purging keg 3 times. Forced carbonation.
2. Fermenting in PET bottles for 4 weeks. Racking wide open then purging keg 3 times. Forced carbonation.
3. Fermenting in PET bottles for 4 weeks. Transferring under external CO2 pressure. Forced carbonation.
4. Fermenting minimally in PET bottles (about 7 days for ales, 12 days for lagers). Transferring under external CO2 pressure to water purged keg. Forced carbonation.
5. Fermenting in corny kegs. Vent fermentation gases through serving keg that was water purged. Transfer to serving with remaining 4-6 points fermentable sugar remaining (not based on time) and carbonate naturally.

Each step was better than the previous, but steps 3-4 and 4-5 were the ones that had the biggest improvements.

Further, if you naturally carbonate, 99.9% pure CO2 is sufficiently impure to oxidize your beer. Only option i am aware of to LoDO on the cold side is to naturally carbonate. I suspected this for a long time but never crunched the numbers.

Until my last couple batches where i took LoDO to the extreme i really had no idea how much better my beer could be. Unfortunately it's a lot more work but the beer is a step up.
 
That right there is your problem. If you must DH in a keg, do it in a mesh bag or something. I have stopped dry hopping in the keg and do it all in the primary with no ill effects.

There is a reason i DH loose, its better.

Minty is with me.
 
I am on board with all of this and think its a great way to cut down on packaging O2 but how do you dryhop or more specifically keg hop? Dryhopping with points left in fermentation taste very different from a keg hop, as it seems more muted or blended. I guess you could leave a dry hop bag in the SK during ferment but I would think the aromatics would be washed away by the 125ish gallons of fermentation CO2. Maybe just spund the FK until it is reeeeal close to finished and the dry hop the SK and tie it to the FK?

Given that the LODO should theoretically increase hop character, maybe the best solution to try is to just use a hopstand for the hopping? Would a hopstand be antithetical to LODO due to the extra oxygen exposure, especially if you have a whirlpool? Then, you don't have to worry about dry-hopping, and should come away with a very aromatic and flavorful beer.
 
Did you transfer from the DH keg?
What's the mesh size of the dry hopper?

300 micron.

No xfer, let the beer sit on the hops in the kegerator cold. Have not had ill effects that some people believe comes from this ("green or vegetal"). Oldsock and JC have stated the same, no ill effects they have seen.

This batch is very finnicky. I wonder if something happened to my filter (dislodged or otherwise). The way i have it setup, is the filter is over the diptube, but the filter touches the bottom of the keg, and the diptube is cut. so in theory, even if particles sneak into the filter, they would settle, and i'd be drawing beer above the bottom, and surrounded by a 300 micron SS mesh filter. In theory.
 
Here is a shot of how good the Clear Beer Draught system works with these beers - worth every penny!

I kegged this five days ago with 4oz of LOOSE pellets in the keg. I let it sit for three days at room temp, chilled for 24hrs then added 30lbs PSI for about six hours and shaken / rolled vigorously several times during that period, afterwards I dropped the pressure to 12lbs ---- that was 12hrs ago. No yeast, no trub, just the tiniest bit of hop matter still there, but will be gone by tomorrow.

To be fair though the last half gallon or so of the keg will produce the gunk that you are trying to avoid.

Awesome, think its settled, that is what I am heading towards.
 
A few thoughts:

1) Don't dryhop in the keg - it always has led to very murky beer for me if you don't let it sit a pretty long time - try just doing it all in the primary and see if you like it.

2) Try using different varieties of hops once in awhile with this same method. Some don't give as much of that astringent, dry character when they are suspended in the beer. Simcoe, for example, doesn't do that as much as Citra in my experience. What hops did you use by the way? Some hops give a very strong bitterness in dryhop and others don't. The bitterness and astringency/drying are two distinct things in my experience. A recent Centennial IPA I did was super bitter after dryhop, first time I've gotten such a bitter dry hop beer!

3) Let it rest very cold for a few more weeks. It will start to clear. There will be a layer of yeast and hops forming on the bottom of your keg. If you don't suck that up with your setup, you will be good to go. If you keep oxygen out of your process pretty well on the cold side, the beer should taste really hoppy and great for at least 4-6 weeks in the keg, maybe longer.

4) It might help to try a different yeast. I have been toying with using WLP002 to see if it drops out more quickly and still leaves good hop character.

5) I bet the Clear Beer Draught would work well. I'm sure the beer at the top of your keg is much less yeast/hop-particle-laden than the beer at the bottom.

I am big on DH'ing in the key as I spund valve and keep the last few days worth of CO2 in the keg. I have considered pushing to a serving keg but i dont like the idea of yet another opportunity for oxygen pickup and figure i'll just end up pushing a bunch of the junk anyways since I am pulling it up with the kegerator anyways.

1318 is my go to yeast, i am sticking with it (not to be mistaken with me not being appreciative of your thoughts, but 1318 is a winner in my book, I can adjust other variables to resolve). This was columbus, citra, galaxy, in ascending order.
 
Wow!! That looks fantastic!! Would you mind throwing out the recipe for that one?!

6 gal 1.058 OG 1.016FG 5.5%

74.1% 10 lbs CMC pale
18.5% 2.5 lbs Flaked oats
3.7%
0.5 lbs whole wheat flour
3.7%
0.5 lbs lactose

0.25 oz 13.2%AA Columbus @ 60mins
1.5oz Citra 13.4% AA @ 5mins
1.5oz Citra 13.4% AA @ 185F 20min whirlpool
5oz Citra dry hop 48 hours
10oz Reanimator Rwanda Kanza 'dry bean' 48 hours
 
Yeah, I'll edit this post with it when I get hop.



FYI: everyone dry hopping in bags, you are better off dry hopping loose! Clear beer draught system is amazing for this. Also supports the idea that loose dry hops add IBU.

http://www.hopsteiner.de/fileadmin/...Method_-_W._Mitter__S._Cocuzza__BBII_2013.pdf


"In the case of linalool, the use of pellets in loose form gives almost 50 per cent more extraction efficiency and, consequently, the likelihood
of a beer with a more intense aroma."

"Nevertheless, the method of hop addition appears to have a clear impact. If pellets are added to the beer in a finely woven, mesh-like container, then the solubility of alpha acid is particularly restricted. Similarly the linalool concentration only attains a considerably lower level."

I read the article quickly but do they say anything about agitating the hops if you bag them? I dry hop at room temp in the keg for 2 to 3 days and shake the heck out of it every so often. The hop flavor and aroma I get is pretty intense. On par with commercial NEIPA's.

Ed Coffey over at Ales of the Riverwards uses a bag to dry hop along with agitating it every now and then. He says he has no trouble getting the aroma and flavor he wants. http://www.alesoftheriverwards.com/2015/09/how-i-dry-hop-maximizing-aromas-on.html
 
Has anyone heard of the new yeast from imperial organic coming out? It's called Juice and is specific for east coast IPA's. It's starting to ship this week
 
I still think I'd rather just go with my 2 oz/gallon dry-hop-only in the interest of saving time during brew day. I had forgotten about that study though.

What are you referring to with the shaking vs pure O2? Pure O2 may destroy some of the hopstand character? FWIW, I stopped using oxygen a long time ago and still get the attenuation I like. I just shake my carboys and pitch a large amount of very healthy yeast. Saves time.

I was thinking about the logic of what happens to the volatile hop oils you just spent 30 to 60 mins infusing during the hopstand if you shake the carboy violently for oxygenation (or if you simply let the wort splash into the carboy). I was thinking you stand a better chance of keeping them in solution if you transfer from the bottom with minimal splashing and then inject pure oxygen into solution at a rate that doesn't let the bubbles break the surface.

McT
 
I was thinking about the logic of what happens to the volatile hop oils you just spent 30 to 60 mins infusing during the hopstand if you shake the carboy violently for oxygenation (or if you simply let the wort splash into the carboy). I was thinking you stand a better chance of keeping them in solution if you transfer from the bottom with minimal splashing and then inject pure oxygen into solution at a rate that doesn't let the bubbles break the surface.

McT

maybe adding yeast the carboy before adding O2 is more important than anything. makes sense to me. i've seen people splash and shake before adding yeast, and that seems like a bad idea to me.
 
Has anyone heard of the new yeast from imperial organic coming out? It's called Juice and is specific for east coast IPA's. It's starting to ship this week

seen some chatter about it. i wonder where Imperial is coming up with all of these strains?!

House could be like WLP007?

Barbarian could be like other Conan strains

Flagship could be like WLP001?

Pub MUST be WLP002-like?

Darkness could be like the WLP095, could be a lot of others though.

Wondering if Independence is WY1318-like?

Citrus?!

Now Juice?!
 
Has anyone heard of the new yeast from imperial organic coming out? It's called Juice and is specific for east coast IPA's. It's starting to ship this week

Yea I'm looking forward to giving it a try. According to a Facebook post by them it's their equivalent of 1318
 
In regard to the use of 99.9% CO2 to carbonate introducing enough oxygen to harm your beer, and losing hop oils out of solution by oxygenating or allowing wort to fall into the fermenter and splash, and other things of that nature..... I have to be honest, I don't believe for 1 second that 99% of beer drinkers could distinguish a variable like that in a finished beer.

Don't get me wrong, I try to be precise and detail oriented. I am all about going out of my way through process and practice to produce consistent and tasty beer. I even go far enough to get called out on paying attention to details that may or may not make a difference in the finished product (water chemistry, pH, mash temps, grain bill %........ and other "details"). I love to experiment and test things out, and I try as best I can to reserve judgement on saying something makes a difference until I really check it out.

Perhaps I am wrong on these things.... and, I may even make an attempt at some point to test them out for myself. But, I would really have to see some head to head, blind tasting of beer suffering because it was carbonated with CO2 instead of primed and naturally carbed. Or, that someone could tell the difference in hoppiness of beer that "splashed" going into the fermenter. I would be surprised.

On a recent episode of Experimental Homebrewing, I think Denny was talking about possibly doing a test of beer that was transferred to a CO2 purged keg (star san pushed out) and a keg that was simply filled - no purging at all. I would never fill an unpurged keg.... so, that might be an interesting starting point to see what those tasters find in a situation like that.

I think there is (with anything) a point of diminishing returns. I would really have to experience this myself to accept that this level of detail matters.

In that vein..... I am hoping to sample my 3 IPA's with different water profiles tomorrow night while I am brewing. As someone who very much believes in the importance of water chemistry, I have to say, my initial tastings tell me I am going to have a hard time telling the difference between them. I sent some out to some others as well.... will be curious as to their thoughts on them.

If there are any LoDO brewers who really apply all (or as much as possible) of the procedures to eliminate O2..... if you are interested in a beer trade, let me know. I would love to sample some brew that went through this process. Would gladly send some homebrew/local commercial beer your way in return. I would be on board for the attention to detail if it is warranted.
 
In regard to the use of 99.9% CO2 to carbonate introducing enough oxygen to harm your beer, and losing hop oils out of solution by oxygenating or allowing wort to fall into the fermenter and splash, and other things of that nature..... I have to be honest, I don't believe for 1 second that 99% of beer drinkers could distinguish a variable like that in a finished beer.

You're probably right... but we're definitely the 1% here. It's also one of those things that until you know the taste, you just don't know. Now that i know what oxidized hops taste like, i can spot it easily. Same for the various esters, phenolics, wine flavors, etc. I can't drink coors light any more because i've been trained to not like diacetyl.


If there are any LoDO brewers who really apply all (or as much as possible) of the procedures to eliminate O2..... if you are interested in a beer trade, let me know. I would love to sample some brew that went through this process. Would gladly send some homebrew/local commercial beer your way in return. I would be on board for the attention to detail if it is warranted.

I would be happy to except there isn't currently a widely accepted LoDO bottling process. I am pretty familiar with the filling process on the commercial scale, and don't think it scales well at all to the HB level. You're talking about multiple vacuum/purge cycles, a sealed fill cycle, and a cap being placed on foam all in a matter of milliseconds.

Come by for a sample though.
 
seen some chatter about it. i wonder where Imperial is coming up with all of these strains?!

House could be like WLP007?

Barbarian could be like other Conan strains

Flagship could be like WLP001?

Pub MUST be WLP002-like?

Darkness could be like the WLP095, could be a lot of others though.

Wondering if Independence is WY1318-like?

Citrus?!

Now Juice?!

Imperial is local to me and Im picking up a can of Juice this week. Doing a split batch with one using Dryhop and the other Juice.

Barbarian is in fact their Conan strain. Juice is more like London Ale III per Imperial.
 
I read the article quickly but do they say anything about agitating the hops if you bag them? I dry hop at room temp in the keg for 2 to 3 days and shake the heck out of it every so often. The hop flavor and aroma I get is pretty intense. On par with commercial NEIPA's.

Ed Coffey over at Ales of the Riverwards uses a bag to dry hop along with agitating it every now and then. He says he has no trouble getting the aroma and flavor he wants. http://www.alesoftheriverwards.com/2015/09/how-i-dry-hop-maximizing-aromas-on.html

Yeah I used to do this. I'll give it the keg a gentle swirl maybe once or twice a day, but I won't shake the **** out of it. You're just beating up your beer and mixing up any residual oxygen from filling. Call me paranoid about DO... especially since I know my transfer process isn't perfect.

I read something else that most of the oils get extracted in the same time period without agitation, but I forgot the source now...
 
6 gal 1.058 OG 1.016FG 5.5%

74.1% 10 lbs CMC pale
18.5% 2.5 lbs Flaked oats
3.7%
0.5 lbs whole wheat flour
3.7%
0.5 lbs lactose

0.25 oz 13.2%AA Columbus @ 60mins
1.5oz Citra 13.4% AA @ 5mins
1.5oz Citra 13.4% AA @ 185F 20min whirlpool
5oz Citra dry hop 48 hours
10oz Reanimator Rwanda Kanza 'dry bean' 48 hours


Awesome!! Thank you :mug:
 
Yeah I used to do this. I'll give it the keg a gentle swirl maybe once or twice a day, but I won't shake the **** out of it. You're just beating up your beer and mixing up any residual oxygen from filling. Call me paranoid about DO... especially since I know my transfer process isn't perfect.

I read something else that most of the oils get extracted in the same time period without agitation, but I forgot the source now...

I hear you about the DO. I should be getting the parts to make a spunding valve today from Amazon....hopefully gonna be able to close transfer the last beer I brewed (4 days in primary) today to secondary/serving keg with the bagged hops.

Yeah, from all the stuff I've read, it seems like the dry hop oils and compounds are extracted pretty quick. 24-48 hours easily. These are small bits of leafy plant matter in an alcoholic liquid. My guess is after a couple of days all we are doing is conditioning the beer and any extended contact with the hop material is fruitless as far as extracting flavor from them.
 
I hear you about the DO. I should be getting the parts to make a spunding valve today from Amazon....hopefully gonna be able to close transfer the last beer I brewed (4 days in primary) today to secondary/serving keg with the bagged hops.

Yeah, from all the stuff I've read, it seems like the dry hop oils and compounds are extracted pretty quick. 24-48 hours easily. These are small bits of leafy plant matter in an alcoholic liquid. My guess is after a couple of days all we are doing is conditioning the beer and any extended contact with the hop material is fruitless as far as extracting flavor from them.

I think the shaking aspect is just make sure the hops have contact with the beer instead of sitting on top. Oils aren't being extracted if they are floating above the beer. It's the reason people bag with weights to hold it down in solution.
 
I still think I'd rather just go with my 2 oz/gallon dry-hop-only in the interest of saving time during brew day. I had forgotten about that study though.

What are you referring to with the shaking vs pure O2? Pure O2 may destroy some of the hopstand character? FWIW, I stopped using oxygen a long time ago and still get the attenuation I like. I just shake my carboys and pitch a large amount of very healthy yeast. Saves time.

I had forgotten about this XBMT as well, hard to remember all of these things!

http://brulosophy.com/2016/02/29/hop-stand-vs-dry-hop-exbeeriment-results/
 
In regards to preventing oxidation. In the brewery I work for, we don't fill corney kegs that often, usually we rack sankes from the brite tanks. However, when we do fill corney kegs, we purge the keg, attach a transfer line to the liquid post, and twist the purge valve "on."

We fill the corney until foam/beer comes out of the top valve and then twist it shut. This get rids of any head space, or any hidden 02 under the lid.
 
I think the shaking aspect is just make sure the hops have contact with the beer instead of sitting on top. Oils aren't being extracted if they are floating above the beer. It's the reason people bag with weights to hold it down in solution.

Right, that's why I shake the dry hop keg. Personally I think it does just as good a job as dry hopping loose.

My friend who has two really nice SS Brewtech conicals started rousing his beer every now and then with CO2 during his dry hop (which he does loose). He's getting greater aroma and flavor than ever before. He says he cranks the CO2 and really agitates the beer. And I feel like I get the same levels of aroma and flavor as him using glass carboys and dry hop kegs with bags (and I think he would agree).

I think agitation helps whether you use a bag or not.

We can all get to the same place with our beers without having to use the same process or tools to do so.
 
In regards to preventing oxidation. In the brewery I work for, we don't fill corney kegs that often, usually we rack sankes from the brite tanks. However, when we do fill corney kegs, we purge the keg, attach a transfer line to the liquid post, and twist the purge valve "on."

We fill the corney until foam/beer comes out of the top valve and then twist it shut. This get rids of any head space, or any hidden 02 under the lid.

How do you vent the ~3oz of volume trapped in the lid that is above the low point of the PRV? Corny lids aren't flat...
 
Back
Top