With the wiki article on spunding, pictures change so much they end up as red x's. The idea is clearly written, and talks about adjustable and the on/off types. My view on the procedure, as with closed-system fermentation, is to not be overly specific with equipment since so much will work. The idea is there and parts we use are listed, but it is left to the individual to think what would work best for them. This thread has "overly" documented all of our experiences with all the different devices. I don't plan on changing the information to much more on the wiki, because of the conversation that happens when people don't understand completely. People complain about this thread being too long, and yet... they ask questions that are answered in it. We happily answer anything that is in question, but also recommend you read the whole combined experiences so that you too may have another idea to add, or another tweak to the process we can all start implementing in our process. I don't want you to think I am just on you, I just want everyone to realize it is a broad area of discussion and ideas packed into a neat little box. I mean, it's not like there are 30 threads about this with information spread all over the forum. Your post is a prime example of what I want from my wiki articles and thread. Now, moving on to your discussion added to this monster of a thread, lol.
I am sorry you bought the on/off type, but it is still very useful. I am glad you are swapping it for an adjustable though. I have had many similar experiences (wait until your valve gets gunked up with krausen and spray paints what's next to it, lol). Adjustables are where it is at, but I highly recommend a buffer for the valve (like the filter housings we have been discussing).
I am confused about your last paragraph. You say you are doing a secondary natural carbonation step. Can you explain more about what you did? I am unable to recommend anything with the limited information. Did you move it from primary to secondary to do this step? I am just concerned you are getting so much psi that I have to ask more. Please fill us in on what your process has been so far.
Now, my newest recommendations from my experiments:
First off, lower pressures (2-15psi) during the growth phase is better for the yeast and will allow for top cropping during the high krausen period for the best yeast... in most cases. I will be changing the wiki to display all this newer information I have found.
Second, I don't like no-chill.
Third, my room temperature fermentation experiments have proven to me that it is do-able, makes a drinkable product, but I know I can do much better with more control. Duh, given, but had to be tried to see. Style dictates this more than anything though. Example, my brown was my best beer ever... this APA leaves a lot to be desired.
Fourth, I like to over-pressure a little bit for the carbonation stage. It is so much easier to drop down to wanted pressure for volume when you are at 68*F than when you are at 35*F.
Fifth, I love my filter for keg to keg transfers. It is easily cleanable and fully autoclavable, and provides me a crystal clear product just minutes after moving a keg that is full of yeast. I have still been unlucky in finding a way for it to work well pre-tap. Seems the filter only works best when both sides of it are pressurized. A tap allows to much pressure release and so the beer first burbs (squirting your kegerator and tap), and then pours with to much head afterwords. I only leave it hooked up now because I haven't bought the stuff to make another "beer only" line. I'm thinking I will buy more quick connects and rig up an easy transfer system like I used to have.
More to come as it develops. I am still thinking through this dry hopping thing. 2oz of hops would be way to much, if left free floating in a keg, for my filter to handle during the transfer. Pellets are just so hard to use for that application. Whole or plugs are my next trials.