• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

tasty beer with less alcohol?

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Aug 2, 2025
Messages
6
Reaction score
12
Location
Maryland
I was in England this past summer, and I was impressed with the very flavorful beers that had low alcohol content--like around 4%.

What I almost always do is brew with Briess DME, 5lbs for 4 gallons of water, and then vary the hops to keep it interesting. Typically my yeast is Safale-05. The result is, to me, normally quite nice, but the alcohol content is pretty high--I never test it, but you can tell by drinking it!

I was thinking I need to use different yeast (yeast that gives up sooner?), or cut back on the DME and then make up for it by using more hops or specialty grains. But maybe I'm completely barking up the wrong tree.

Thoughts?

Thanks!

MG
 
I was in England this past summer, and I was impressed with the very flavorful beers that had low alcohol content--like around 4%.
What English beers or beer styles are you trying to replicate using DME?

eta: my thought is to find a couple of all-grain recipes for the beers you want to replicate and then the HomeBrewTalk community can offer opinions on how to convert the recipes from all-grain to DME or partial mash.
 
Last edited:
What English beers or beer styles are you trying to replicate using DME?
You know, I can't remember what they were, which sounds silly, but there it is. The time I was struck by the abv:flavor ratio, I was at the Lamb & Flag in Oxford; I just checked, and I didn't recognize any names, so I think they must have different beers on tap right now.

But I can say this much: there weren't very bitter--far from a hardcore IPA--and yet they were quite flavorful, not watery at all.
 
"Keeping it simple" sounds great. But would it then be less flavorful?

I've been taking a bunch of my double ipa recipes and creating "session" versions - basically going from ~8.5% down to ~5% - and have been pleasantly surprised how good the results have been, with more depth than I expected.

So I would expect going from ~5.3% to ~4.3% would still be enjoyable...

Cheers!
 
tagging @Northern_Brewer and @Peebee (a couple of brewers on "the other side of the pond") to see if they can help with identifying beers or beer styles that match what you are trying to replicate.

Assuming those beers / beer styles can be identified (or at least agreed upon), and a likely recipe is available, the next step will be to try to convert from "all-grain" to "DME" or "partial mash".
 
I've been taking a bunch of my double ipa recipes and creating "session" versions - basically going from ~8.5% down to ~5% - and have been pleasantly surprised how good the results have been, with more depth than I expected.

So I would expect going from ~5.3% to ~4.3% would still be enjoyable...

Cheers!
Ha, so maybe I just need to worry less!
 
This book has the recipes you’re looking for.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6886.jpeg
    IMG_6886.jpeg
    1.8 MB
Typically, decreasing the malt bill results not only in a lower ABV beer, but also one with lighter mouthfeel and body. In turn you might want to think about the hop/malt balance, where decreasing the DME by a lb without also decreasing some bittering hops would likely result in a beer that still tasty, but more hoppy in terms of balance. Just depends on what you're aiming for because you could also compensate elsewhere in the malt bill if you wanted. Or increase mash temp a degree or two.

Using a less attenuative yeast without any other changes would result in a maltier/sweeter beer while decreasing the ABV. So it's two very different approaches.
 
Last edited:
I hadn't paid attention to this thread till this morning and as I began reading I was gonna get around the the 'styles' part and ask what styles you like, but @BrewnWKopperKat beat me to it and your response made me step back;
First: Welcome to the Fun!
Second: It sounds to me like at this point you've discovered what many on here have: ANY homebrew, made following proper procedures results in a beer that is better than 99% of the popular crap most bars serve.
My recommendation is that you chose a specific style from freely available recipes to try out and then try out another one for your next brew and so on... give youself time to enjoy and at the same time experience what each style actually is. Each yeast available is usually associated with a specific style or range of brews.
Let us know a specific beer you want to brew next and we can better advise...and yeah: worry less!
:mug:
 
I live in the 3% - 5% world. Getting there and remaining flavorful is pretty easy. That said, there are some beers whose flavor, in part, come from the alcohol (Dead Guy ale comes to mind). Making a 'Utah' clone of this one will get you a different flavor.

I lean more on the fuller specialty grains (120°, Special B, debittered black malt, etc.) for increased flavor and add some maltodextrin for mouthfeel.

I would also start taking gravity reading to determine ABV. You don't know what you don't know.
 
One of the ways British brewers get more flavor from less grain is to use more flavorful malt. Pay a bit more, use Muntons DME rather than Briess. Get rid of the 05.

Muntons amber to 1.036-40, some EKG, Fuggle, or whatever similar to 30 or so IBUs, a flavorful, low-med attenuating British yeast. It's a delightfully moderate pint.
 
tagging @Northern_Brewer and @Peebee (a couple of brewers on "the other side of the pond")
Eh ... ? What's this? What's waking me up from months of napping?

Ah! Low alcohol brewing. This subject always makes me giggle when on a USA site, 'cos our view of "low alcohol" is completely out of step with Americans: We think 0.5% ABV (in the UK that's NOT "no-alcohol" like most of the rest of the world), Americans think 4-5% ... that's the strength of beer we most often drink, and which we most often get blatted on (we typically have no sense of quantity, whereas ten pints of 0.5% "low alcohol" beer and the problem isn't "falling over" (drunk), it's ... (use your imagination).

I used to be very active on the "low alcohol brewing" a few years ago, but to be honest I gave up due to being unable to compete with the commercial stuff. Unlike the full-strength stuff where it's quite feasible to outdo most commercial boys & girls. We have, and I drink, Williams Bros (Scotland) "AF" offerings which makes for some interesting stuff, and the very palatable "Guinness 0%" (0% !!!) which is remarkable given I usually associate "Guinness" with purveying the "Devil's wee-wee".

But, enough of that, where I left off was with intentions to try: Low Alcohol brewing - Lallemand. Although they use their own "Windsor" yeast which I find tends to "creep" ferment that which it should leave alone (I always used S-33 yeast which was more reliable, but mashing at 74C ... I hadn't stuck my neck out as far as trying mashing at 80-82C, but that may be what it takes).

Lallemand now produce LoNa but not for home brew scales it seems?

You may want to consider exploring cold extraction. This has been on my list of techniques to try out.

https://www.brewingwithbriess.com/b...onents-and-their-use-in-brewing-applications/
That's very hazardous! Lots of people have tried it and burnt-out their boiler elements in the process. I have tried it: Alot of work for not the best returns. But could see the problem when boiling produced lots of what I referred to as "grain omelette" (a translucent brown protein "gel").
 
Last edited:
"Keeping it simple" sounds great. But would it then be less flavorful?
That seems kind of strange since the most sold beers on the planet tend to be in the 4% to 5% range. I guess you could then say that they are less flavorful, but that mainly comes down to them being brewed that way. And with that mindset, an 12% ABV beer would be more "flavorful" than a 10% ABV beer, which would be more "flavorful" than an 8% ABV beer, which would be more "flavorful" than a 6% ABV beer, which would be more "flavorful" than a 4% ABV beer. But we know that's not the case. a 4.5% ABV beer can be just as flavorful (if not more so) than a 9% ABV beer.

Now, a 2.5% ABV beer can be extremely flavorful, while a 6% ABV beer might be really watery. In fact, you could make a 10% ABV beer that's not flavorful at all and a 1.5% ABV beer that's incredibly flavorful.

With extract, you can't mash at higher temperatures to add unfermentable complex sugars, but you can add maltodextrin, lactose, and other unfermentable sugars for body and flavor, though I don't think there's usually any need to do that at 4% or 4.5%. But even then, it's also arguable whether it's ever "necessary." A lot of historical low ABV styles in the 2.5% to 3.9% ABV range are just made with lower amounts of grain and not from mashing large amounts of grain at a higher temperature.

So, in other words, yes, 3%, 3.5%, 4.5%, and 4.5% can be just as flavorful at 6%, 7%, 8%, or higher.
 
Ah! Low alcohol brewing. This subject always makes me giggle when on a USA site, 'cos our view of "low alcohol" is completely out of step with Americans: We think 0.5% ABV (in the UK that's NOT "no-alcohol" like most of the rest of the world), Americans think 4-5% ... that's the strength of beer we most often drink, and which we most often get blatted on (we typically have no sense of quantity, whereas ten pints of 0.5% "low alcohol" beer and the problem isn't "falling over" (drunk), it's ... (use your imagination).
Eh, I don't think that's true, though. The most popular beers in the US at in the 4-5% range. Guinness is 4.2%, a lot of American "light" beers are between 3.8% and 4.4% ABV (Labatt Light is 4.0% for example).

Granted, in the US, outside of craft beers, you don't tend to see beers with the low ABVs of English milds, for example, or Berliner Weisse and so on, but I think generally the only people in the US who consider 4-5% to be "low alcohol" tend to only drink imperial stouts, imperials IPAs, rectified spirits, and other super high-ABV stuff so that the most popular alcohol strength of beers seem "low alcohol."

Though... that said... I don't think practically anyone in the US would think of 0.5% ABV if they heard "low alcohol." That's pretty much non-alcoholic.
 
I made an extract brew with the Simply Pale Ale extract and 1.2KG of 'beer enhancer' that came out at 3.9% and it was fantastic. Great session beer and I served it at a BBQ and my friends drank me dry of about 30 bottles.

Edit: I just realised Simply might not be available in the US, sorry.
 
Last edited:
or the near non-existent flavor of BMC Lite.
While a lot of people would agree that BMC Lite is incredibly low on flavor, the other example I gave, Guinness, is one I think most people would agree is quite flavorful, regardless of whether you like it or not. And it's typically 4.2% ABV in the US, though there have been Guinness variants that go lower than that. I brewed an Irish dry stout a few months ago that was 3.7% ABV and it had a ton of body and really rich roasty, chocolatey, and creamy flavor.

Lots of ways to achieve that with extract. Whether by just doing nothing different from normal, since 4% or 4.5% ABV isn't really that different from 5.3% or 5.5% ABV. But if you went much lower, by using specialty malts as steeping grains (which would already be part of the style if he was making an English mild), using a slightly lower attenuating yeast, adding unfermentable sugars like maltodextrin or lactose. But I brew in the 3.5% to 4.5% ABV range most of the time, and I don't feel the need to do anything different from a 5% or 6% ABV beer to add more body. And my 3.5% beers are more "flavorful" than most commercial 6% or 7% ABV beers.
 
Last edited:
OP here with an update.

First, I'm grateful for all these ideas. Going forward, I'm going to try (a) different yeast, (b) steeping grains, and (c) Muntons. Alas, my LHBS doesn't sell Muntons. But you can't have everything.

Second, in the short run, I need to get cracking so I'll have something for an upcoming office party. So I got the following going yesterday: 3 gallons of water + 3# Briess Light Pilsen (the very last of my DME) + 1.25 oz Cascade (20 min) + 1.25 oz Cascade (5 min) + Safale05. We'll see what happens.

Thanks again!

MG
 
tagging @Northern_Brewer and @Peebee (a couple of brewers on "the other side of the pond") to see if they can help with identifying beers or beer styles that match what you are trying to replicate.
Sorry for the slow response - but although the big British thread here is great, if you're serious about this stuff you're better off crossing the pond to HBT's transatlantic cousin at www.thehomebrewforum.co.uk
The time I was struck by the abv:flavor ratio, I was at the Lamb & Flag in Oxford; I just checked, and I didn't recognize any names, so I think they must have different beers on tap right now.

But I can say this much: there weren't very bitter--far from a hardcore IPA--and yet they were quite flavorful, not watery at all.
Assuming those beers / beer styles can be identified (or at least agreed upon), and a likely recipe is available, the next step will be to try to convert from "all-grain" to "DME" or "partial mash"....my thought is to find a couple of all-grain recipes for the beers you want to replicate and then the HomeBrewTalk community can offer opinions on how to convert the recipes from all-grain to DME or partial mash.
The trouble is that the Lamb & Flag is a free house, which means it makes a point of avoiding the big-name breweries that USians will recognise and whose beers are the ones that people try to clone. And they also make a point of rotating them, but you may be able to see one you recognise by looking at their Untappd reviews for a week either side of when you were there.

However they are Untappd members so we can check out the current menu, and their CAMRA Whatpub entry, which tell us their regular casks are XT Four (badged as Inklings Ale) and Prospect from Oxford Brewery.

Four is a 3.8% "modern session amber ale" with Cascade and Bramling Cross, (Shotover) Prospect is a 3.7% paler "session bitter, lower in alcohol, yet big in body and flavour. It delivers a surprisingly big mouthfeel and a striking dry hoppiness" and "Mild bitterness, dry hoppiness and hint of toffee...Smell: Toast, mildly fruity with a touch of honey" although they're a bit vague about what's in it beyond "a variety of malts with New World and English hops". Usually you can identify the big name cereals used (so the "extras" like wheat, oats etc) by the legally mandated allergen notice, but naughtily they don't have it. But even if you didn't want them to tell you a recipe, they wouldn't be surprised to have someone ask about allergens.

It's a bit unusual to have two brown-ish bitters under 4% as your core beers, most typically you see a yellow bitter of 3.8% with New World hops and an amber best of 4.2% with British hops. At the moment they obviously have enough trade to sustain seven beers on cask (which is A Lot), so they can have fun over 4%, then fall back to a more limited offer outside the tourist season. Certainly there's a lot of British pubs which don't normally have any cask beer over 4.5% as they just can't sell enough of it within the limited lifespan of cask, I know some where it's an explicit rule that they don't go over 4.5%, it's only in city centres that it really works.

Oxford is not my neck of the woods so I don't know the breweries there well, but I guess what they're doing with the two core beers is the two extremes of trad amber bitter, the Prospect is more of a "northern" style with "dry hoppiness", and Four will be more of a typical Thames Valley style with more crystal and less bitterness. But looking at the current menu it's mostly yellow, something like Double-Barrelled's Skyline is the kind of thing you'll see a lot of on cask in British pubs, a 4% pale with Columbus, Citra and Centennial. Then two more trad options at 4.2% and 5%, a rye beer as the "oddity", and a lactose stout to complement the Guinness equivalent on keg, a 4.4% stout from XT.

So other than the lactose stout being over 5%, their current beer list is all pretty standard cask for a beer-forward pub here.
"Keeping it simple" sounds great. But would it then be less flavorful?
I lean more on the fuller specialty grains (120°, Special B, debittered black malt, etc.) for increased flavor and add some maltodextrin for mouthfeel.
So I would expect going from ~5.3% to ~4.3% would still be enjoyable...
It's a classic mistake, to overcomplicate these things. If you look at actual British recipes, they are generally pretty simple, although commercial beers may use similar ingredients from multiple sources just to ensure consistency and reduce the impact of something becoming unavailable. It's as much about process as recipe. Like classic British cooking, it's about taking a few good quality ingredients and letting them shine, rather than using lots of ingredients in an attempt at "complexity" and ending up with a muddle. Personally, the entire malt inventory for 90% of the British beers I make (at 4-4.5%) is - a sack of Maris Otter pale malt, and that's it. Ideally Warminster, usually I end up with Fawcett or Simpson, I'm not so keen on the East Anglian maltsters like Munton & Crisp. Maybe I add 5% torrefied wheat for head if I'm feeling fancy, but generally I don't really need it.

I'd listen to people like the legendary James Kemp, one of the co-founders of Cloudwater (at one point second in the world on Ratebeer behind Hill Farmstead). He explicitly rejects complex malt bills for these beers :
https://web.archive.org/web/2018041...co.uk/yeast-brewing-myths-ideal-house-strain/
what is it about [trad bitter] that makes them so interesting and amazing? I’d thought for a while that it was malt character and quality and especially malt complexity that help create such an interesting beer at a modest abv. This was certainly a tack I tried to take when I was brewing commercially but when you look at these beers and their recipes you’ll find them to be simple and very much the same....This really doesn’t leave much else apart from yeast and that in fact I think is the key, traditional British beers, even though they are fairly ubiquitous are exceptional because the main character building ingredient is the yeast....

From a lifetime drinking this kind of beer, and fewer years of trying to brew them, I would say that there's a real sweet spot around the best strength of ~4.2-4.3%, it gets a lot harder once you go below 4%. Still possible to make great beer, but exponentially more difficult. But that's OK, because you're not meant to think too much about <4% beer, it's for downing by the (imperial) gallon whilst spending a night talking with your mates. Anyway, in the first instance I would aim for 4.2-4.3%.
Having drunk quite a bit of US attempts at British styles, I'd say the major things US brewers (with a handful of notable exceptions) get wrong :
The big one is they almost always end up too sweet, they have this idea British beers are quite sweet and under-attenuated, possibly from drinking in London tourist pubs that don't condition their beer properly. One reason is that they think that all the colour comes from crystal, when it's normal to use caramel or black malt to bring the colour up to a consistent level for commercial reasons. It doesn't help that tourists seldom stray from the Thames valley where beers tend to be more crystal heavy but we have recipes and even the Fuller's partigyle (Pride, ESB etc) is only 7.2% light crystal, whereas up north they may not use any crystal at all.

That's part of a wider theme, that British beers are all about balancing all the ingredients, you shouldn't be going for extremes. And one of the most important ingredients that USians tend to get wrong is carbonation. Too much and it just overwhelms modest beers, turning them into a mess of carbonic acid. So go easy on the carbonation. It's easy to laugh at CAMRA's obsession with dispense, but you only have to compare (force-carbed) Coca-Cola with (naturally yeast-carbonated) fancy sparkling wine like champagne to see the difference in bubble size, which completely changes the mouthfeel. It's not true for all beers - I know different beers which are best served in can, cask, bottle or keg - but cask does suit a lot of these lower-ABV beers. And I think one thing that the prevalence of cask here has given us, is an awareness of how carbonation affects beer which follows through when eg canning hoppy New World-style beers. OTOH that doesn't mean cask-conditioned beer is as dead as it usually is in London tourist pubs, it still has "condition" (and I've had the cellar showers to prove it), but you want to be in the range of 1.6-1.8 vol CO2, maybe a touch more for bottles.
Whilst on dispense - serving cold kills these beers. That doesn't mean they're served "warm" as legend has it, but too cold definitely kills them. The official recommendation is for cask beer to be kept at 12-14°C (54-57°F), personally I like to serve a touch lower than that and let it warm up in the glass through the official sweet spot, but we're talking 10-11°C (50-52°F) not fridge temperature. These differences may seem small, but I know a town where one CAMRA pubs has its cellar at 12°C (54°F) and the other at 14°C (57°F), and locals talk about one having "cold" beer and the other having "warm" beer, depending on their personal preference! To be fair if you were here during the recent heatwaves then a lot of cellars were struggling to maintain temperature....
I was in England this past summer, and I was impressed with the very flavorful beers that had low alcohol content--like around 4%.

What I almost always do is brew with Briess DME, 5lbs for 4 gallons of water, and then vary the hops to keep it interesting. Typically my yeast is Safale-05. The result is, to me, normally quite nice, but the alcohol content is pretty high--I never test it, but you can tell by drinking it!

I was thinking I need to use different yeast (yeast that gives up sooner?), or cut back on the DME and then make up for it by using more hops or specialty grains. But maybe I'm completely barking up the wrong tree.
You don't want "yeast that gives up sooner", or with less attenuation as it's called in brewer-speak. It's another myth in the US that British yeasts have low attenuation, in reality it's that dryness that helps makes the beer so moreish and sessionable, 77-82% attenuation is quite common and some classic beers have attenuation over 90%, albeit with the help of some sugar in the recipe. And you shouldn't need to "make up" for less DME with hops or speciality grains - the cheat code you are looking for is "use British ingredients" as they're more flavourful to start with. Notably we have more flavourful barley - in particular malts from single varieties like Maris Otter and Golden Promise - and base malts are kilned for longer to give a bit more toastiness. Conversely, for now I would avoid any pilsner/"*extra* pale malts as they will give you less flavour and body.

Now you're at a disadvantage if you only use malt extract (aside from it being a lot more expensive per batch), as there's a lot less choice. In particular I think the only single-variety malt extract is Munton's Maris Otter liquid malt extract (LME), and LME stales quickly so you only want to get it from sources that you know have the turnover to keep it relatively fresh. Alternatively you need to get into all-grain brewing, which will open the doors to a full range of malts, and lower costs per batch, albeit at the expense of a relatively modest up-front cost. You can get all complicated, but all you need for basic brew-in-a-bag (BIAB) is a net bag, a way to heat water/wort, and a way to monitor (and ideally control) the temperature. There's lots of advice on BIAB around this place, so I won't go into more detail here.

It's a similar story with yeast - there's no great English-style dried yeasts, although a lot of beer is made commercially with the likes of Nottingham, S-O4 and Windsor (the latter usually mixed with one of the former). Mangrove Jack M36 Liberty Bell is probably a mix of Notty and Windsor and as such is a safe bet if you're restricting yourself to dried. Two AEB yeast (sold in the US under the Cellar Science and Apex brands) that may be worth trying are their New-E (which claims to be a dried London Ale III type) and the plain Fermoale (not Fermoale AY3 etc) allegedly from Tetley. A more leftfield option might be Fermentis BE-256 which although marketed as Belgian has roots in England, maybe mixed with a bit of T-58 for some phenolics for interest. But I would strongly encourage you to split a batch and ferment the same wort with different yeasts, to get an idea of what each brings to the party - a lot of it is just personal taste.

Going to all-grain over extract is more of a priority, but liquid yeasts give you a lot more choice of British strains - Wyeast 1469 and Imperial Pub are good places to start; I have a bit of a soft spot for WLP041 - not flashy, but makes really nice sessionable beer. Of course we're spoilt here in the UK as supermarkets have fresh Fuller's 1845, bottle-conditioned with the production yeast, or we can get cask dregs from pubs. And if you want to go to the next level, Brewlabs have all the best strains as slopes....
https://www.themaltmiller.co.uk/product-category/ingredients/yeast/brewlab-yeast-slopes/
https://brewlab.co.uk/services/yeast-list/

But don't worry too much about that just yet.
So I got the following going yesterday: 3 gallons of water + 3# Briess Light Pilsen (the very last of my DME) + 1.25 oz Cascade (20 min) + 1.25 oz Cascade (5 min) + Safale05.
The Light Pilsen is described by Briess as "the lightest pure malt extract available commercially" - not what you want if you're looking to maximise body. Even if you can't readily get British DME (aka "spraymalt"), at least use Briess Pale Ale DME, or even their Munich LME, rather than the Pilsen. And personally I'd push the hops a bit later, there's no point boiling away all the flavour compounds; I tend to smear a 100g pack over 10min/flameout/whirlpool/dryhop.

I should probably stop there. But I'll leave you with some more reading from Jeff Alworth :

A celebration of cask beer : https://www.beervanablog.com/beervana/2018/10/12/the-worlds-most-crafted-beer-is-cask-ale

Discovering "juicy bitter" in a series of articles in late 2019 starting with :
https://www.beervanablog.com/beervana/2019/9/10/juicy-bitter-on-cask

An article on making modern bitter, and an associated blog which goes into more detail :
https://beerandbrewing.com/style-school-cask-bitter/
https://www.beervanablog.com/beervana/2025/4/7/the-evolution-of-cask-bitter
 
My favorite lower ABV beer is British mild. Flavorful and very drinkable.
About 17 years ago, we did a nice swap on this forum with our best milds. The rules were they must be brewed, fermented, carbed and shipped by day 10 of brewing. That was fun- and turned out some wonderful tasty beers. https://www.homebrewtalk.com/threads/project-10der-and-mild-10-milds-in-10-days-in-month-10.77758/

Anyway, not that you’re in a hurry, but there are some great recipes in there. I believe mine came in about 3.2%, and I loved it.

I did it all-grain,but converted it to partial mash so an extract brewer can do it if they wanted.
IMG_4897.jpeg
 
Wheeler's book, "Brew your own British Real ale" is kind of the the bible here.
But he never gives the yeast to use. Saying (elsewhere) that homebrewers probably wouldn't have access to the yeasts which the breweries were using.


Timothy Taylor Landlord 4.2%, is my favourite pub draught beer. When it's stored and served well.

Living in Scotland, where TTLL, isn't available on tap locally (the nearest place I know is near Penrith, nearly 300 mile away). So I've been trying to come up with a decent clone.
Once I switched to the right yeast (one which was derived from the TT brewery), Wyeast 1469 West Yorkshire. The result was amazing.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top