After diluting to get 1.040 wort I managed to get 3.5L.
Left about 300ml trubby crap in the pot.
Going back to the OP, which I feel I've hijacked a bit, any starter is better than no starter when using wet yeast, but all methods only work well when healthy, viable yeast are used. The simplest method involving just leaving it and swirling it occasionally, when you pass it, works fine. It takes 4 days or so and the cell count is going to be a little lower, but it works. As already noted, a stir plate, my method of choice, is the most efficient method for culturing yeast. It only needs to keep the yeast in suspension where they freely access sugars and other nutrients. An Atlantic style maelstrom isn't needed, regardless how impressive it might look. Two very important factors to consider when culturing yeast starters. Keep it warm, up to 30℃ is fine. The warmer it is the higher the metabolic rate. Remember it's a yeast culture not a fermentation. And aerate the starter wort. Yeast need O2 to bud efficiently. Give it a good shake before adding the yeast. If you have pure O2, use it. Pure O2 can take even a stir plate to a whole new level.
If you have a yeast pack that's passed its best and maybe not sufficiently viable for a single step starter, start with a mini starter of about 10ml wort in a 30ml vial. (Ideally, the wort at this step and the next is sterile, at least double boiled, as described earlier.)
Just add a tiny drop of the yeast slurry, no bigger than a match head. Leave for at least 48 hours, until yeast sediment forms (like above). Step up to 100ml and leave it for another 48 hours. Repeat, 500ml then 2500ml. You're guaranteed to have significantly more viable yeast cells than had you pitched the whole pack in 2500ml. The aim really is to maximise the probability of a successful fermentation, rather than take chances with the unknown.