Anyway, the paper isn't about how Belgian ales are made and understanding how they are made isn't actually relevant to the question addressed, the methods used or the results obtained, and it only impacts the interpretation of the results to the extent that they mistakenly ascribe the differences in physical and chemical properties of the ales to different numbers of fermentations rather than the composition of the grist. You don't have to know the difference between ales and lagers or dubbels and tripels to be able to analyze the differences in physical and chemical properties of commercial examples of each. But yeah, they should have consulted an actual brewer or two and gotten the background right. And I guess that I'm also a little bit surprised that none of the reviewers or editors seem to know what a tripel really is either.
I'm not going to read it even though I think it's probably pretty fascinating. But that's because fluid dynamics is way the hell over my head, not because I distrust the results.