Just grabbed a bottle of Cuvee Rene. Not expecting it's very old. It's from a bottle shop with pretty big turnover, but I would like to know what the bottling date codes mean if possible. Internet tells me nothing. It's one of those whacky codes... LA22NGC?
Based on what one guy said, looks like January 22, 2014.
Just grabbed a bottle of Cuvee Rene. Not expecting it's very old. It's from a bottle shop with pretty big turnover, but I would like to know what the bottling date codes mean if possible. Internet tells me nothing. It's one of those whacky codes... LA22NGC?
L = Lindemans
A = 1 = January
22 = 22
N = 14 = 2014
GC = Gueuze Cuvee?
January 22, 2014
Give it another try, I've never been disappointed.Personally not a fan of cuvée Renee. But it could have just been piss poor condition at the shop itself
After a tasting back in March where we opened Blauw, Framboos, Malvasia Rosso, B1 Hommage, Cantillon Brabantiae, Blabaer, Crianza, B1 and B2 50N4E, as well as some other limited release or 1 off lambics we decided that going after one offs was not really worth it unless you were getting them at retail/release. but the armand 4 set was better than any of the gueuzes we had that night in March. and as for fruited Hommage was the best we had and thats Why I tracked down 2 bottles when it hit the U.S.
Does anyone have any insight as to what is especially different about A&T compared to regular OG or even OGV? I imagine it is subjectively better, but what about it is so pleasing to the palate?
I wouldn't say that it's subjectively better than OGV. It's close, not necessarily better.Does anyone have any insight as to what is especially different about A&T compared to regular OG or even OGV? I imagine it is subjectively better, but what about it is so pleasing to the palate?
"helped"Tomme helped blend it. Duh.![]()
I had A&T and GB within a month of each other, and I found that the A&T had a more vibrant and lemon-like vibe to the gueuze, and particularly more funky on the nose. Whereas the GB was a bit more dryer and oaky, which I'm assuming is coming from the 4-year lambic addition. Both are still drinking awesome, but I'd prefer A&T.Does anyone have any insight as to what is especially different about A&T compared to regular OG or even OGV? I imagine it is subjectively better, but what about it is so pleasing to the palate?
Does anyone have any insight as to what is especially different about A&T compared to regular OG or even OGV? I imagine it is subjectively better, but what about it is so pleasing to the palate?
I have noticed that for some "vintages", however the 2014 kriek is a normal $20. Not sure if Kurt's pricing has always been that way for beers other than the current year's vintage.Has anyone else noticed the prices on belgiuminabox jump by like 100%? 2013 cantillon kriek and rose are like 24-25 euro. that is just outrageous. Kurt has great pricing on the volume deals but come on man that's like $40 for cantillon kriek and rose which are about $20 when they are in the U.S. I know the supply and demand argument, but people do not buy them even if they switch back in forth between in stock and out of stock my guess is no one buys them at that price though.
They have always been higher but not 10 euros higher for 1 year older. I bought 750s of 2005 cantillon kriek from etre last year for 17.5 euro eachI have noticed that for some "vintages", however the 2014 kriek is a normal $20. Not sure if Kurt's pricing has always been that way for beers other than the current year's vintage.