Hi all. I'm fairly new to winemaking (several batches in progress, one successfully completed and mostly consumed), which brings me to my question: If a recipe calls for 6 months' bulk aging followed by a minimum of 6 months' bottle aging, but -- hypothetically, of course -- the winemaker was a bit lazy and had left it in bulk for a year, would it benefit appreciably from sitting an extra few months after being bottled, or would it be at the expected level of drinkability straight away?
Obviously I can taste it at bottling, but even if it's fine then, I don't want to jump the gun if it's likely to vastly improve over the next month or two. I was thinking that perhaps the oxygen introduced at bottling could have an important effect, but I have no clue how long that would take to become apparent in the wine.
Thanks!
Obviously I can taste it at bottling, but even if it's fine then, I don't want to jump the gun if it's likely to vastly improve over the next month or two. I was thinking that perhaps the oxygen introduced at bottling could have an important effect, but I have no clue how long that would take to become apparent in the wine.
Thanks!