yeah, BUT you can still tell color and clarity from the picture on the left, and SRM is officially measured shining light through the beer so...
regardless, St Bernardus 12 is not consistent with Belgian dark strong ale, but the OP made an adequate clone. It doesn’t change the fact that the beer he was cloning isn’t a quadrupel.
I just did another test Spencer’s Trappist vs Unibroue Terible vs mine (LeMaître’s Flocculant Sprial)
Spencer hits clarity, still a little too dark. They fulfill the need for deep malt, but it legit tasted too metallic. That one is much closer to a quad then is St Bernardus or Terible.
I think the issue is that we overdo it too much (not WE, but brewers in general). Sometimes, there are styles that deserve to stay the way they belong.
Trappist and Abbeys are among those that are the most widely criticized because the true stylings are incredibly difficult. Go half a degree too hot with a certain yeast and you get clove and your quad is ruined. Go half a degree too low and you get zero fruit...go slightly heavy handed on the hop addition and it’s suddenly way too bitter.
Trappists are inherently delicate, but regardless...a brew that is SRM 45+ doesn’t at all belong in the category of Trappist...or at least isn’t a quad. I’d lean much more towards this being classified as one of the Belgian porters I’ve had as far as color goes