I guarantee there is a design team that just $hit a brick.“Unveil end of year, aiming to ship next year,” he added.
Which is Musk for mockup drawings next year, unveil around 2027, and ship (maybe, if ever) by 2030![]()
I guarantee there is a design team that just $hit a brick.“Unveil end of year, aiming to ship next year,” he added.
Which is Musk for mockup drawings next year, unveil around 2027, and ship (maybe, if ever) by 2030![]()
Even if you take into account the cost savings on fuel and maintenance?so, no electric car for me yet for a while, we switched our car from a 2003 citroen xsara picasso to a 2020 renault kadjar.
Electric still just costs too much for a similar car that it isn't worth it for us.
I'd think one buys that type of performance not for comfort, rather, effectually for the brutality of it.
Sadly yes, the price difference would cover 10 years of gasoline even for the cheapest reasonably similar electric carEven if you take into account the cost savings on fuel and maintenance?
I guess I was interested in the full calculation including savings in the differences in fuel vs electric cost per mile and maintenance savings. Over time these generally save more then the vehicle cost difference.Sadly yes, the price difference would cover 10 years of gasoline even for the cheapest reasonably similar electric car
I guess I was interested in the full calculation including savings in the differences in fuel vs electric cost per mile and maintenance savings. Over time these generally save more then the vehicle cost difference.
Buying a new car is never going to make economic sense if you already have a perfectly serviceable car. So I think it's safe to assume arguendo that the context is "if you're buying a new car anyway..."Or, in the context of someone that has a perfectly serviceable and perhaps even paid for ICE car, but buying an EV as replacement for sake of cost of electricity vs gas, etc.?
I think it really depends on the context and to me it's not clear what you're really saying.
Is the context you're framing of someone that's decided to buy a different vehicle so it's the consideration of buying ICE or buying EV?
Or, in the context of someone that has a perfectly serviceable and perhaps even paid for ICE car, but buying an EV as replacement for sake of cost of electricity vs gas, etc.?
You mentioned your reason was the difference in price was 10 years of gas.
I sought clarification on the context from Bilsch because it occured to me that's the point of Kharnyb, he's not buying a different car anyway.Buying a new car is never going to make economic sense if you already have a perfectly serviceable car. So I think it's safe to assume arguendo that the context is "if you're buying a new car anyway..."
And in the process confused him into thinking that you were Kharnyb!I sought clarification on the context from Bilsch because it occured to me that's the point of Kharnyb, he's not buying a different car anyway.
And in the process confused him into thinking that you were Kharnyb!
Like I said, if we're doing a cost of ownership comparison between an upfront expenditure of tens of thousands of dollars and an upfront expenditure of zero dollars, well, it's going to be really hard to beat spending zero dollars.
And in the process confused him into thinking that you were Kharnyb!
Like I said, if we're doing a cost of ownership comparison between an upfront expenditure of tens of thousands of dollars and an upfront expenditure of zero dollars, well, it's going to be really hard to beat spending zero dollars.
It's something you gotta play with your own numbers for anyway. Someone else's use case, operating and maintenance costs may not parallel yours.Oh well. I guess I really didn't need to know.
The price of hydrogen would have to be $3/kg to reach price parity with electric vehicles. It's currently over $30 in California where all the H2 filling stations are. In comparison it's about 15 euro/kg in Europe.I saw Toyota has a great hydrogen engine design and you don't need a battery. To little to late possibly? Electric has started to take hold.
Tech News World link
Yeah, but I'm guessing that's because there is no infrastructure and California is always expensive as hell anyways.The price of hydrogen would have to be $3/kg to reach price parity with electric vehicles. It's currently over $30 in California where all the H2 filling stations are. In comparison it's about 15 euro/kg in Europe.
The problem for hydrogen is that you will always be able to drive at least twice as far on a kilowatt of electricity directly in an EV then you could on the hydrogen made from that same kilowatt of power. Sadly there is no way around that.Yeah, but I'm guessing that's because there is no infrastructure and California is always expensive as hell anyways.
That sounds like the perfect project for the innovators out there.Hydrogen works great in a closed system. It will never work for the millions of cars across the country. It’s simply too expensive to transport, store, and dispense.
That's a great point.The problem for hydrogen is that you will always be able to drive at least twice as far on a kilowatt of electricity directly in an EV then you could on the hydrogen made from that same kilowatt of power. Sadly there is no way around that.
Except it's not that there is any shortage of energy in a broad sense. It's mostly a quantity, density, and timing issue. A single AA battery holds 0.07 cents worth of utility electricity, but obviously you expect to pay way, way more than it's electrical value for various reasons.The problem for hydrogen is that you will always be able to drive at least twice as far on a kilowatt of electricity directly in an EV then you could on the hydrogen made from that same kilowatt of power. Sadly there is no way around that.
The problem for hydrogen is that you will always be able to drive at least twice as far on a kilowatt of electricity directly in an EV then you could on the hydrogen made from that same kilowatt of power. Sadly there is no way around that.