... but my point is Bird... the media is talking about this like this guy could be a cancer that spreads to the rest of the team.... and I'm saying that I don't get that argument... remotely.
Haynesworth for example. The guy was a tub of crap that was just overflowing with fail. Ok, so does that mean there were other players who were suddenly starting to act like him?? Of course not. So WTF is that argument all about??
Even if Haynesworth STAYED on the team, other than taking up a roster spot, what "damage" was he gonna do to other players? Do people really think other players would start playing worse or care less about winning because Albert Haynesworth was a team mate?? That sounds insane to me.
Haynesworth for example. The guy was a tub of crap that was just overflowing with fail. Ok, so does that mean there were other players who were suddenly starting to act like him?? Of course not. So WTF is that argument all about??
Even if Haynesworth STAYED on the team, other than taking up a roster spot, what "damage" was he gonna do to other players? Do people really think other players would start playing worse or care less about winning because Albert Haynesworth was a team mate?? That sounds insane to me.