And how is this yeast related with TH?https://www.lallemandbrewing.com/en/canada/product-details/lalbrew-cbc-1/
CBC-1 is a "killer yeast" strain and will literally wipe out living competitors, like wb06 and t58...
Cheers!
And how is this yeast related with TH?https://www.lallemandbrewing.com/en/canada/product-details/lalbrew-cbc-1/
CBC-1 is a "killer yeast" strain and will literally wipe out living competitors, like wb06 and t58...
Cheers!
And how is this yeast related with TH?
No one is really sure of its application in TH yeast. CBC1 only consumes simple sugars, like glucose and dextrose, which makes it a good candidate for conditioning/natural carbonations.And how is this yeast related with TH?
That looks very orange for an ultra pale malt baseI don’t know where this thread has gotten to, since I haven’t logged in in a while. However, I saw this and thought it might be relevant
yea, that’s what I was getting at. I was always a doubter (I thought it was incidental), but here we areThe description of data set 3 confirms that the house yeast is a blend!
Likely the recipe from their YouTube videos that was discussed a few pages back.recently released recipe?
107 pages in, I can't remember. was la3 ever analysed and compared?
Edit*
I searched but didnt find any analysis of LA3
So many english yeasts out there, marmalade makes me think of the conan family thoughView attachment 816446
I’m guessing that this is a LAIII reference
If I was nod and winking at LAIII, that's basically what I would write. Conan almost always comes with a reference to peach rings and/or VermontSo many english yeasts out there, marmalade makes me think of the conan family though
This…Likely the recipe from their YouTube videos that was discussed a few pages back.
How was the bitterness on the recipe? Seemed like a lot of hops during bittering phases instead of doing a whirlpool. How long was the wort on the hops after the flame out addition?Hope everyone is well. Not sure if anyone has brewed the recently released Treehouse recipe, but below is a side by side of the recipe on the left, and Very Hazy on the right.
I have to say, I really love this recipe - the thing that stands out most to me is the malt bill. After I dry hopped this and let it sit for 48 hours, the malt profile reminded me of the first time I had Haze. Unfortunately I didn’t have a can of Haze on me to compre, so I had to use my only can of Very Hazy (it was an old one from 12/6/22). Instead of using Rahr standard 2row in mine, I used their Pale ale malt (it’s technically 2row - just a little higher srm) making my final SRM around 5.5. The malt profiles are super close, although I would say Very Hazy tasted a LITTLE more roasted. Mine was more hoppy but that’s to be expected.
I think this recipe is great and the hop combination is lovely - I’d suggest everyone try it. I think 10% flaked oats and 5% Carafoam is a good start as well - the body and mouthfeel are spot on. Cheers!
Well balanced, definitely not over bitter in my opinion. I whirlpooled for 20 minutes.How was the bitterness on the recipe? Seemed like a lot of hops during bittering phases instead of doing a whirlpool. How long was the wort on the hops after the flame out addition?
sounds like 3 and 5 are london ale based, but 3 has a bit more of that vanilla thing going on? Possible the Verdant / London Fog or that vanilla forward one sapwood cellars is using vs classic 1318?.So that's conclusive - at least, assuming they're using the Omega thiolised yeasts, at 7:06 he says that Dataset #4 uses "a thiolised yeast strain...based on the base yeast strain that's utilised in Dataset #5". And Dataset#5 uses "a classic European yeast strain that was sold to us as a phenomenal maker of hazy IPA". (9:06)
Omega has only done thiolised versions of their Chico (West Coast Ale I), 1318 (British V) and Mexican Lager. So the working hypothesis would be that #5 is British V and #4 is a thiolised British V, either the original IRC7 Cosmic Punch or the more powerful patB Helio Gazer.
He's a bit vague about the parent strain of #2, but the way he says that it's drier makes me wonder if that's a thiolised Chico, which from Omega would mean the patB Star Party.
One wonders if they are all Omega yeasts, in which case #3 would be one of their eight British ale strains - if they're used to using S-04 then I or II are their Whitbread strains.
That would be compatible with WB-06 being in there, which single-handedly trashes hop character IME - perhaps there's been a change in process which means WB-06 becomes more rampant (pitching together rather than separate fermentations?? or something similar??)It is insane how much their yeast blend absolutely tramples hop character.
Man, this has always been my problem with them. Years ago, after the initial wow over the flavors I quickly realized no matter what hops they used they were completely masked by that house yeast flavor. Sometimes I wondered if they just slap a different label on some of their beers and call it a day.I had a buddy send me three of their newer beers cause I wanted to see what the expression of these specific hops had in a Treehosue beer. It is insane how much their yeast blend absolutely tramples hop character. One was using the new hop, Pink, from Jackson Hop Farms. The other was showcasing 1019 and the the other was a Nelson focused beer.
These are are very expressive hops that are rather unique. One should be able to pick them out upon cracking the can. I literally could barely tell these beers apart. 1019 is maybe one of the most powerful, unique, expressive hops to date and again maybe every 2nd or 3rd sip could I find it. All their beers taste and smell so much alike it’s crazy. I’ve also had a decent amount of what I believe is acetaldehyde in quite a few of their beers lately.
There are certainly better yeasts available to make great hazy hoppy beers these days.
Yup, I'm not down on anybody enjoying what they make. I do too. Couch just struck a cord in me that nailed exactly how I've felt for a while.I get everyone has preferences but a lot of us are looking to achieve fruit salad beer. I recently went and love everything I got. Juice Machine, Very Green, King Julius… each very different from each other.
Has anyone controlled WB-06 as to not produce the clove?
Does anyone have links to Nate’s online forum posts that have “nuggets of wisdom” as referenced by Fidens Brewing Co in their Craft Beer and Brewing article?
That happened at a fairly early stage in this thread, something like 87:8:5 S-04:T-58:WB-06 IIRCI would be curious to see if someone could blend after fermentation to at least be able to dial in some ratios.
Yes. Early on in this thread I did a wb only beer with a lot of hops and the clove was still present no matter what we did. Same with the yeast blends including wb. I still don’t think they are using wb unless they are doing something to get rid of that clove. I did so4 with t58 with not bad results.I get everyone has preferences but a lot of us are looking to achieve fruit salad beer. I recently went and love everything I got. Juice Machine, Very Green, King Julius… each very different from each other.
Has anyone controlled WB-06 as to not produce the clove?
Does anyone have links to Nate’s online forum posts that have “nuggets of wisdom” as referenced by Fidens Brewing Co in their Craft Beer and Brewing article?
Tree House just released a new data set video
I have them all in my fridge ready for tasting.