So I tried S-23 for the first time, and now I'm REALLY confused why there's so much hate for it. I originally bought it because it was on sale and I had never used it before, but afterwards I looked online to see overwhelming hatred for it from so many homebrewers. In particular, with the famous "Denny" saying that it made the worst beer he had ever made that he ended up dumping.
During my first gravity sample, I got some very very mild, light esters, but it was very pleasant and clean. With my second (and final) gravity sample, the esters were extremely faint. Maybe more than with W-34/70, but if so, only minisculely more. When I kegged it, I massively keg hopped (which had been my plan from the beginning), and now with it fully carbed up, it's just extremely clean. Now, people will say that if I didn't dry hop it and instead just made a very subtle, delicate lager with very little hop flavor or aroma, it would be completely different. Maybe, but I wouldn't make a beer like that, and at it's current state, it tastes very similar to the W-34/70 West Coast Pils I made in December.
Even from the perspective of attenuation, the W-34/70 was 89% attenuation while the S-23 is 86% attenuation. They're both very dry, crisp, clean lagers with no off-flavors that I think taste very good.
On the one hand, if S-23 was such an unpopular yeast, I doubt Fermentis would still be selling it, but I really can't see where the hate comes from.
That said, I don't see myself picking S-23 over W-34/70 in the future. But I also don't see any reason not to buy S-23 in the future if I see it sold for cheaper than W-34/70 (which was the main reason I tried it out in the first place). My next lager will probably be a New Zealand Pilsner and will probably be with W-34/70 (though Diamond is one I'd be interested in trying), but I bet I could make a really tasty beer using S-23 there too.