Theropteryx
Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi all,
I've encountered the "time to brew vs free time" problem - sounds like this is common amongst people who share this hobby. A common solution to this problem is to produce more beer per brew day.
With that said, I would like to attempt make the volume jump by purchasing minimal equipment.
I'm currently brewing 5 gallon AG batches - that's to say that I have:
8 gal mash tun
8 gal boil kettle
(no HLT)
Chugger Pump
Bayou classic burner
Multiple fermenters
If I were to purchase a 15 gallon mash tun (I prefer steel kettles for easy temperature control during step mashes), I could (theoretically) use my old mash tun as a HLT and a boil kettle during the same brew day. So the workflow would look something like this:
1.) HLT (8 gal mash tun) sits on top of burner 1
2.) 15 gal mash tun sits on top of burner 2
3.) First runnings and second runnings from the sparge would be split between my two 8 gallon pots, and thus the boil would be split across two burners and two pots.
If I do this, the main problem is that initially, the concentrations of sugar between 8 gallon pots would be different. I'm sure that I could use my pump to equilibrate the concentrations of the wort, however I'm not sure if that would be difficult to achieve in reality (as it sounds simple in text).
I think that this would mean that all I would need to purchase would be another burner and a 15 gal mash tun.
Thoughts on this? Do any of you brew 10 gallon batches in a similar way?
I've encountered the "time to brew vs free time" problem - sounds like this is common amongst people who share this hobby. A common solution to this problem is to produce more beer per brew day.
With that said, I would like to attempt make the volume jump by purchasing minimal equipment.
I'm currently brewing 5 gallon AG batches - that's to say that I have:
8 gal mash tun
8 gal boil kettle
(no HLT)
Chugger Pump
Bayou classic burner
Multiple fermenters
If I were to purchase a 15 gallon mash tun (I prefer steel kettles for easy temperature control during step mashes), I could (theoretically) use my old mash tun as a HLT and a boil kettle during the same brew day. So the workflow would look something like this:
1.) HLT (8 gal mash tun) sits on top of burner 1
2.) 15 gal mash tun sits on top of burner 2
3.) First runnings and second runnings from the sparge would be split between my two 8 gallon pots, and thus the boil would be split across two burners and two pots.
If I do this, the main problem is that initially, the concentrations of sugar between 8 gallon pots would be different. I'm sure that I could use my pump to equilibrate the concentrations of the wort, however I'm not sure if that would be difficult to achieve in reality (as it sounds simple in text).
I think that this would mean that all I would need to purchase would be another burner and a 15 gal mash tun.
Thoughts on this? Do any of you brew 10 gallon batches in a similar way?