Just saw
this on GBH and I'm still astounded by it:
Matthew Modica: "I think it depends what circles you’re speaking to. If this was 10 years ago I’d say people were more interested in making sure to make a stop alongside their previously planned trips. I don’t know anyone in my field who has ever “needed” to see a brewery. For myself, even, when I’m in Belgium I didn’t really have a desire to see Cantillion. I did, twice, but I just didn’t care. Instead I took a bottle of Underberg on a photo tour of the brewery. If the desire is to see steel and people at work, or, in the case of Cantillion, spiderwebs of which you likely won’t understand, then you can see steel and people at work 5 miles from your house and hopefully support your local economy."
Literally what in the **** is this person trying to say? "I didn't have a desire to see Cantillon...I went twice but I didn't care." OK? This dude's been into beer for over 10 years and he doesn't understand the difference between Cantillon and your local brewpub? I understand not needing to go on the Cantillon tour more than once, dear lord man. The beers available to drink on premises are worth the stop in alone, especially if you're al-*******-ready in Belgium. The odd condescension in that paragraph makes me want to puke.