Thanks. Do you see any issues with my plan for a "stronger" sour? Pitch mixed culture into 6 gallon batch, ferment 2 weeks. Make 1 gallon un-hopped lacto batch, let sour to 3.2. Transfer both into 5g secondary for long term aging?
When you talk about a "mixed culture" fermentation, are you talking brett/sacch/lacto/pedio? Just brett/sacch/lacto?
I've only done a few quick-sours, one with a more traditional sour mash using unmilled grain, and more recently a kettle sour with Lactobacillus Plantarum. The kettle sour turned out sour very quickly...2 days, then a boil and hit it with sacch. Honestly the turn around time of this method was just as fast as a clean beer. I can't say there's a ton of complexity, just a great fruity/citrusy/pineappley acidity, and a ton of flavor for a sub 4% abv beer.
As burninator mentioned, Pediococcus is what will require more long term aging. That's not to say a brett/sacc/lacto ferment might not benefit from 6 months +, but you probably won't need it. Brett as a primary fermenter should ferment out pretty quickly. From my understanding, Pedio+Brett play off of each other and create off flavors (and textures!) that clean each other up in the long term.
My question, then, is why make two separate batches to blend together prior to aging? A healthy mixed culture ferment should sour your beer just fine. If, after extensive aging, it's not sour enough...I'd blend a strictly lacto-soured to taste prior to packaging.
Just my 2 cents, based on what I've read
