Nope, I meant it the way I wrote it. I think an excessive dosage might be the reason.
I see. It's probably the scarce dosing that it is the reason as it appears that, below a certain unknown threshold, ascorbic acid can act as a "superoxidizer" - post #106 by
@Silver_Is_Money - and the remedy is either to add a little bit of sulphides or increase the ascorbic acid dose substantially.
Adding sulphite has several cons:
- Beyond a certain threshold, it stinks;
- At any threshold, is not something good for you;
- Some people is allergic to sulphites - which is one of the reason why there is a compulsory mention in the label above 10 mg / litre - and I would like to avoid asking people, when I offer a glass of my beer, whether they have an allergy for sulphites.
Ascorbic acid was proven in this thread to be effective against oxidation if used in massive amount, 1 gram per US gallon or circa 5 grams for a 20 litres batch.
The cons of massive dose of ascorbic acid are:
- 5g on 10 litres is 20g for hectolitre and the law in Italy, or probably in the EU, for what I know, states a maximum of 15g / hl. Not clear to me whether this is the limit beyond which a mention in the label is compulsory, or an absolute limit. If the latter is true, it's an "illegal" beer. And imagine you offer it to somebody, who has an allergy to ascorbic acid (if that exists) and dies, you go behind bars.
- Not clear the effect on beer flavour for such massive amounts;
With my next bottling, I will use the 15g / hl maximum allowed, which I hope is sufficient to avoid the superoxidiser effect, and see how it works.
I tend to lay down beer for at least three months and I happen to drink beer which are 6 - 9 - even 12 months old.