Cape is only talking about the millennium when he makes these inane comments. Remember that stats are only good in context...
Obnoxious Football Trash Talk Thread
- Thread starter Cape Brewing
- Start date
Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:
Guess suicide watch is over. Here's some nice shiny stats showing Appearances aren't all they're cracked up to be for some teams. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Super_Bowl_champions#Super_Bowl_appearances_by_team
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Super_Bowl_champions#Super_Bowl_appearances_by_team
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
Guess suicide watch is over. Here's some nice shiny stats showing Appearances aren't all they're cracked up to be for some teams.
View attachment 46794
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Super_Bowl_champions#Super_Bowl_appearances_by_team
Niners 5-0!!! 6-0 after next season.
OP
OP
Guys.... Its simple. Since the year 2000, there has not been a better team. Go ahead, try to prove me wrong.
You can all blab on and on all you want but if you could wave a magic wand and switch records, stats, etc., you would do it in a second and say "thank you" immediately following.
You can all blab on and on all you want but if you could wave a magic wand and switch records, stats, etc., you would do it in a second and say "thank you" immediately following.
cdubbaya
Well-Known Member
Cape Brewing said:
The Packers owned the 60's, the Steelers owned the 70's, the 49ers owned the 80's, Cowboy's owned the 90's, and the Patriots owned the 2000's.
But it's a new era, and the Patriots are dead if they don't build up that nursing home they call a defense. The AARP is sending scouts to practice.
OP
OP
Wow... There's dumb... And than there's that statement
Guess suicide watch is over. Here's some nice shiny stats showing Appearances aren't all they're cracked up to be for some teams.
View attachment 46794
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Super_Bowl_champions#Super_Bowl_appearances_by_team
I spent too much time digging through stats after that chart.
My worst-friend used to like those guys. Haven't thought of the Oilers in years. Ahhh...memories.
Oh yeah, Pats suck!
Yea, me too. This one is good too
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_National_Football_League_Championship
Wasn't a lot of teams early on but it's interesting how many times GB played NYG for the championship. That must have been "the rivalry" for many a year along with da Bears.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
why would i want to switch stats with someone who hasn't won a superbowl in 7 years?
so cape, what's the running total? how munch money have you spent to watch the patriots lose superbowls?
D_Ranged_Eskimo
Well-Known Member
I'll take a history of winning over a decade of dominance any day of the week cape.
13 is the magic number.
13 is the magic number.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
yeah, no kidding. patriots have been around what, 50 years? you just caught a little hot streak.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
go away.
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
True. The Pats defense isn't old, it's just not very good.
I'd rather have to find a cornerback and maybe a pass rushing linebacker than a new quarterback. Just sayin'.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
not quite sure how this constitutes as "going away"
OP
OP
... and I haven't been alive for 50 years so I couldn't care less about the freakin' leather-helmet era. It's all cute and wonderful for folks to day dream about how great their teams were right after the freakin' Great Depression but I'll live in the recent past.
OP
OP
LOL!!! Ok... so if I offered you the next ten years with 3 Super Bowl wins in 5 appearances in exchange for a "history of winning" you would pass??
LOL!!
Really?? That's what you're trying to convince me of??
You're funny. Like Moto.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
the battle cry of angst-ridden teens everywhere.
i'm sorry you don't have a long and storied history of winning. wait, no i'm not.
i'm sorry you don't have a long and storied history of winning. wait, no i'm not.
D_Ranged_Eskimo
Well-Known Member
Sure would. Besides, the last one they showed up to, they walked away with hardware.
OP
OP
Hey Moto... while I was at the Super Bowl I got a chance to hang out behind the set of the NFL Network... it was kinda cool... Rodgers was about 20 feet from us doing analysis on the game.
He looked pretty comfortable in a suit with a microphone in his hand on Super Bowl sunday.
He looked pretty comfortable in a suit with a microphone in his hand on Super Bowl sunday.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
did he look more or less comfortable than brady, throwing to nobody in particular in the end zone?
D_Ranged_Eskimo
Well-Known Member
How did his MVP title look up close?
Instead of showing off his pretend Championship belt, is Rodgers now going to pretend to hoist his "NFL-MVP" trophy in State Farm commercials?
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
no. that doesn't even make sense.
are those commercials nationwide?
are those commercials nationwide?
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
eh, your picture of Tiquan was better. for multiple reasons.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
you know? i'll just repost the hilariousness, so everyone to see the stupidity.
... as if Tiquan's hair couldn't get more awesome.
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
Ain't that the truth. Still, Niners would have beat you as well.
Psss. Giant's defense, in the playoffs, has been as good as anybody's. Pats wouldn't have necessarily scored any more points than they did (they REALLY missed Gronk out there), but I don't see them scoring any less.
And, there's a lot of things that I don't know, but one thing I do know... Alex Smith ain't throwing that 38-yard pass on the Giants' last drive.
I was nervous about playing the Giants, but I would not have been playing against San Fran.
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
Lol. You would have had both TEs completely taken out of the game and no running game at all. 14 points would have been enough for our defense to beat you.
Well, we'll worry about that the next time the 49'ers make the Super Bowl. I mean, it's only been what.... eighteen years since their last appearance? You've got to figure they're overdue.
OP
OP
LOL... awesome... like anyone gives a &^*$ about it other than you and him.
Sure... it looked amazing. Everyone on the street was in awe!!
LOL.
Bwaaaaaahahahahahahahahahaha <cough> <cough> ahahahahahahahahahaha!
How sad for you...
Bernie Brewer
Grouchy Old Fart
And the Pats would have to keep up that pace for the next 100 years to catch up to the Packers.
You may not care less about it, but it was still there. And every single NFL pundit acknowledges it. You just don't want to "care" about that era because it makes the Pats stats seem less remarkable. Kinda pathetic, really.
OP
OP
Maybe... But... To me... That doesnt seem as pathetic as clinging onto something that took place even before you were born because it seems to make your current situation seem more remarkable. Cause that kinda strikes me as pathetic.. Really.
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
We had to have a punt returner make a popwarner level mistake for the Giants to beat us. Pats just were not as good.
Ok, that's some nice work right there. A for real LOL.
Bernie Brewer
Grouchy Old Fart
Cape Brewing said:
I'm not clinging to anything. I'm trying to get you to face reality.
Similar threads
