brettg20
Well-Known Member
Good beer is a matter of opinion...but the fact we are all making beer is what matters...cheers to all
Lol, well like others have said it is subjective, and I would love to try your first couple batches. So funny you think you can brew quality beer not knowing your system. Tell ya what buddy, if your beer is half as good as say Firestone Walkers anything, I will spread your good word and call you a god. Something tells me I am not to worried about it lol... I started on this forum before my first batch and read three books and am a general fanatic at whatever I get into. Sure you can make beer people will like, and that is good, but high quality you can measure all the way around with no faults? Don't think so.... Like I said man, prove me wrong, I will do tasting on this sight just to prove how awesome you are LOL. I have seen you on here before and your posts so bring it all day buddy :cross:
I love how many people were making fantastic quality beer on their second and third brew. I thought my first batch was great, but to be making consistently fantastic quality beer....100 plus batches and that was my experience and most pro's will tell you the same. It is a matter of balance and adjusting to your system to really get there. 2-3 batches my ass lol.... Would love to try these peps brews lol...
Always love the "got to know your system" guys. Whatever the **** that means. Hitting your mash temps? Not hard. Pitching healthy yeast and good aeration, ferm temps in line? Not hard. Boom - if you had a good recipe that's a great beer without offlfavors. Brewing really is simple. Designing unique great beers is hard, but the actual brewing of great beers is easy.
Sure you "got to know your system" to exactly duplicate it again, but if you brew it next time and it's 5 OG higher? Still probably a great beer, even if you don't have an identical one. It's all in the recipes bruh.
Yeah... what's up with the puffed out chests guys... take it down a notch. Grab a beer and chill out.
"good quality" is so subjective. Unless you have entered a beer and received a good score I don't think you should be saying you have brewed "good quality" beer. How many of these 1-3 batch guys entered any of those beers and had good results?
If you asked me 3 years ago if I was brewing good quality beer I probably would have said yes. However, I had never entered a competition, never been to a HB club meet or won an award. If you ask me now I would say it took a lot of batches to get this so called "good quality" and I would slap my older self for ever telling anyone I made good beer. And 5 years from now I'll probably think what I'm making now is **** and slap my current self.
Depending on how dedicated and obsessed you are, 3 years is more than enough time to learn and correct mistakes. Water, temperature control, yeast control, and recipe selection are the four biggest drivers that lead to mistakes. If you feel confident that your water chemistry is right, you are controlling your temperatures correctly, pitching the right amount of yeast, and finally using a good recipe, then you are making quality beer.
And sanitation/general handling of beer during transfer, etc....
Sanitation? What's that?
Just kidding. Yea, forgot about that one because it's so ingrained in me now that I don't even think about it. That's really the foundation upon which everything is built. If you can't keep your equipment clean enough, you will NEVER make quality beer.
They're not all home runs. But I'm not trying to nail down 2-3 perfect beers and repeat them over and over. I'm trying to have fun with this, and experiment, and that carries risk with it. The risk of making the occasional dud. But every now and then, it works out better than you even dared to hope, and I find that exceptionally rewarding.
I think this is an important point to make. I'm somewhere in the 40 batch zone. I have tried to make a repeat of a previous batch a grand total of 4 times. One of which is BM Cent Blonde, one of which is a simple Cali Common, and a 50% pale 50% wheat hefe. None of which are terribly complex to repeat.
The other 35 or so batches have been mostly of entirely different styles. Not recipes, but different styles entirely. A pils here, an irish red there, chocolate stout somewhere else. Still on the list of things to do is a proper barleywine (waiting on aeration system), porter, RIS, and more. I've heard the kottbusser name tossed around lately, probably whip up a batch at some point.
Problem with this is with all the bouncing around it makes it impossible to perfect any particular recipe. The subtleties between Spalt and Saaz are lost when one goes into a pils and the other a dunkleweizen. This means that later on down the road I can't say "Maybe my pils would be better with Saaz" because I never had the chance to have a true side by side.
Or, do we harness the energy? I propose we create a "Smack Down" series on HBT. After all, without chest thumping and competition, the bar for "quality" would be nowhere as high as it is today.
Pick a style and send me your beers, boys. I'm happy to settle this publicly and fairly.
All rise. The honerable Judge Hopner, presiding.
zc