• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

HBT Fantasy Football League

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Look, math is hard in the NFL. Projections week to week are based on unicorns and puppy dogs.
 
So is there anyway to change how they rank us? Im not concerned about dropping so far this week but later in the year it will matter. Can you imagine if you were supposed to go to the playoffs but didnt because of this mess. I think it should go by record and than points scored. Thats the only fair way to do it
 
finsfan said:
So is there anyway to change how they rank us? Im not concerned about dropping so far this week but later in the year it will matter. Can you imagine if you were supposed to go to the playoffs but didnt because of this mess. I think it should go by record and than points scored. Thats the only fair way to do it

I think under league settings it is supposed to be record, then head to head record for tie breaker. But yeah, now that you mention it, the rankings this week make no sense
 
Sounds like a Class Action Lawsuit (CAL) against the NFL FFL is in your future.

Think of all the pain and suffering. Multiply that by 10,000,000.
KA-CHING! :ban:

Can we stipulate that the award must be paid in beer? Limited releases preferably.
 
I think under league settings it is supposed to be record, then head to head record for tie breaker. But yeah, now that you mention it, the rankings this week make no sense

Yeah im pretty confused, hopefully this is something we can change. I Wouldnt want someone that was supposed to be in the playoffs to miss out cuz of this bogise rankings rule
 
So is there anyway to change how they rank us? Im not concerned about dropping so far this week but later in the year it will matter. Can you imagine if you were supposed to go to the playoffs but didnt because of this mess. I think it should go by record and than points scored. Thats the only fair way to do it

It uses point differential for calculating your rank.
It's not a bad way to do it.
Over a whole season it's probably a better indicator of your team's worth rather than its sheer score.
 
I just checked and the STANDINGS tie breaker is the head to head record, not a MATCH-UP tie breaker. I think this should be based on total points your team has scored. It doesnt make sense for someone to be ranked higher than someone else who has scored more points than them
 
It uses point differential for calculating your rank.
It's not a bad way to do it.
Over a whole season it's probably a better indicator or your team's worth than the sheer score.

Each game is won by the points your team scores. shouldn't the season be won the very same way?
 
Each game is won by the points your team scores. shouldn't the season be won the very same way?

I assume, you're not a mathematician? :D

Let me get that for you:

Each game is won by the point differential your team scores for each and every game.


Let me draw a simple scenario for you:

TEAM A:
game 1: W 100-99
game 2: W 100-99
game 3: W 100-99

Total: W-L 3-0
score: 300-297


TEAM B:
game 1: W 150-99
game 2: W 95-99
game 3: W 130-99

Total: W-L 2-1
score: 385-297


Which team do you choose?
 
that isnt how the rankings are, check again. hop town has a negative point differential and he is the 1st one listed in 1-1 group, and also has the least points scored in the 1-1 group, thats bs! And everyone else after him is in no order of point differential. I can do math, you need to check you process again

If point differential was how they ranked us, zippie fairies should be first
 
finsfan said:
zippy fairies should be first then. He has won twice and has the biggest point differential and most points. THATS MESSED UP!

Then I have no solutions. I'm just going to sit back and let my team do its thing and if I win, I win. If I lose, I close my account and y'all never hear from me again. ;)
 
Hello said:
You're welcome to, if you must. I'm not going to suck in mine or clean up my language though. :D
Do I still have to put pants on? :D
 
Andrikos said:
Ok ladies (and lady :D

Here are this week's rankings.
biggest mover of the week, well lookie here: Sacks of Life!
Only nonmover: Silly Nannies. Hope you're comfortable on your lazyboy Grampa! :)

Yes, I am quite comfy in my recliner. While all y'all play musical chairs week to week, I'll be rolling steady and sneak in for the win at the end.;)
I'm actually satisfied with my standing. I've won both of my matchups so far even though I was projected to lose both. I beat week one's #1 ranked team contributing to his lengthy fall down the rankings. And I've been in the top 3 both weeks. So, I'd say things are going good. I can't be overly confident because there's still alot of season left, but I'm happy with how I've started out.
 
Yes, I am quite comfy in my recliner. While all y'all play musical chairs week to week, I'll be rolling steady and sneak in for the win at the end.;)
I'm actually satisfied with my standing. I've won both of my matchups so far even though I was projected to lose both. I beat week one's #1 ranked team contributing to his lengthy fall down the rankings. And I've been in the top 3 both weeks. So, I'd say things are going good. I can't be overly confident because there's still alot of season left, but I'm happy with how I've started out.

It's you and me this weekend buddy boy.
One of us is going down!
Hope you enjoyed your view so far... :ban::tank::fro:
 
The view has been great. The air up here smells so nice as well.
 
So nobody else is taking this seriously?

There are 8 teams at 1-1 currently. The only teams that are out of order of total points scored are those that have had head-to-head matchups already. Hop Town def. Sacks of Life, Sacks of Life def. Drunk Monkies, and Drunk Monkies def. Hop Cones. From Kansas Cultures on down, it's ranked by total points scored.

The 2-0 and 0-2 teams are all ranked by total points scored (not point differential).

I'm doing all of this while participating in a meeting, so excuse me if anything above is incorrect. And I'm not saying I agree or disagree with it, but that's just the way it looks like it's being calculated.
 
There are 8 teams at 1-1 currently. The only teams that are out of order of total points scored are those that have had head-to-head matchups already. Hop Town def. Sacks of Life, Sacks of Life def. Drunk Monkies, and Drunk Monkies def. Hop Cones. From Kansas Cultures on down, it's ranked by total points scored.

The 2-0 and 0-2 teams are all ranked by total points scored (not point differential).

I'm doing all of this while participating in a meeting, so excuse me if anything above is incorrect. And I'm not saying I agree or disagree with it, but that's just the way it looks like it's being calculated.

Ok this makes sense now. I guess it will start to work itself out better as we get deeper into the season, I was just terribly confused on rankings
 
Ok this makes sense now. I guess it will start to work itself out better as we get deeper into the season, I was just terribly confused on rankings

I agree. I doubt it will be an issue toward the end of the season, but early on it is making for some confusing rankings.

If we do end up with 2 teams with the same record in the end, I would want it to be based on head-to-head results rather than just points. However, it gets more complicated when there are more than 2 teams with the same rank who haven't all played each other...
 
The view has been great. The air up here smells so nice as well.

Uh oh...

"Initial projections have this one as a potential embarrassment, with Hopfen Bieropulos favored to win by 31.56 points, the largest margin in the league."

I'm screwed.
Silly Nannies, this game is yours.

I'm adding myself to the NFL FFL CAL.
 
And of course, they had to add this disclaimer:

"Being expected to win hasn't meant a lot in this league. This season, projected losers have won a surprising 60.0% of all games. "

Yeah, no **** Sherlock.
 
IF anybody needs a QB upgrade and wants Russell Wilson, send me a trade offer. I need a RB and WR. I may keep him this week but then will probably let him go.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top