I think it uses the same algorithm that it projects your score for the week. Or more simply put, it's all effing guesswork 
For those of you starting at 0-2, don't get discouraged.
I think it uses the same algorithm that it projects your score for the week. Or more simply put, it's all effing guesswork![]()
Seriously. According to that algorithm, I should be 2-0, not 0-2...
finsfan said:So is there anyway to change how they rank us? Im not concerned about dropping so far this week but later in the year it will matter. Can you imagine if you were supposed to go to the playoffs but didnt because of this mess. I think it should go by record and than points scored. Thats the only fair way to do it
Sounds like a Class Action Lawsuit (CAL) against the NFL FFL is in your future.
Think of all the pain and suffering. Multiply that by 10,000,000.
KA-CHING!![]()
I think under league settings it is supposed to be record, then head to head record for tie breaker. But yeah, now that you mention it, the rankings this week make no sense
So is there anyway to change how they rank us? Im not concerned about dropping so far this week but later in the year it will matter. Can you imagine if you were supposed to go to the playoffs but didnt because of this mess. I think it should go by record and than points scored. Thats the only fair way to do it
It uses point differential for calculating your rank.
It's not a bad way to do it.
Over a whole season it's probably a better indicator or your team's worth than the sheer score.
Each game is won by the points your team scores. shouldn't the season be won the very same way?
There's a simple solution to this.
Win EVERY week.
finsfan said:zippy fairies should be first then. He has won twice and has the biggest point differential and most points. THATS MESSED UP!
Do I still have to put pants on?Hello said:You're welcome to, if you must. I'm not going to suck in mine or clean up my language though.![]()
So nobody else is taking this seriously?
Andrikos said:Ok ladies (and lady
Here are this week's rankings.
biggest mover of the week, well lookie here: Sacks of Life!
Only nonmover: Silly Nannies. Hope you're comfortable on your lazyboy Grampa!![]()
Yes, I am quite comfy in my recliner. While all y'all play musical chairs week to week, I'll be rolling steady and sneak in for the win at the end.![]()
I'm actually satisfied with my standing. I've won both of my matchups so far even though I was projected to lose both. I beat week one's #1 ranked team contributing to his lengthy fall down the rankings. And I've been in the top 3 both weeks. So, I'd say things are going good. I can't be overly confident because there's still alot of season left, but I'm happy with how I've started out.
So nobody else is taking this seriously?
There are 8 teams at 1-1 currently. The only teams that are out of order of total points scored are those that have had head-to-head matchups already. Hop Town def. Sacks of Life, Sacks of Life def. Drunk Monkies, and Drunk Monkies def. Hop Cones. From Kansas Cultures on down, it's ranked by total points scored.
The 2-0 and 0-2 teams are all ranked by total points scored (not point differential).
I'm doing all of this while participating in a meeting, so excuse me if anything above is incorrect. And I'm not saying I agree or disagree with it, but that's just the way it looks like it's being calculated.
Ok this makes sense now. I guess it will start to work itself out better as we get deeper into the season, I was just terribly confused on rankings
The view has been great. The air up here smells so nice as well.
IF anybody needs a QB upgrade and wants Russell Wilson, send me a trade offer. I need a RB and WR