Feedback on English Dark Mild Recipe?

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I could also taste a difference before and after the addition.... Especially the unrefined sugar comes with big molasses flavour, a bit like licorice, this part of the flavour got changed with the baking soda adition, at least according to my taste buds.

Interesting. Did the high heat baking soda neutralization create the licorice flavor, or remove it?
 
Interesting. Did the high heat baking soda neutralization create the licorice flavor, or remove it?
It changed the licorice into something close, but not the same. Hard to describe. I think piloncillo and raw cane sugar is basically the same, so we are probably talking about the same flavour. Your plan with the windsor sounds good. I have done same type of recipes with other yeasts, about 25-30 ibus, 1.04ish og and moderate late addition plus using only noble hops (goldings ftw!) = marvelous bitter.
 
I got the molasses/licorice flavor when I used one of the dark piloncillo raw sugars. Not a hint of it in either of these though. I'm contemplating brewing with that jaggery invert #2 today, if I can get a move-on. Just superior 2-row, a little flaked barley and the 1 lb #2 for about 10% of fermentables. Then hit it with a low attenuator like Windsor.

EDIT: 5:50pm brewing update

Brewed the following today. The LHBS was out of Windsor, so I went with London and mashed high.

INVERT 2 EXPERIMENTAL BREW
1.044-1.014, 3.9%, 25 IBU
81% Superior Pale Ale
12.5% Jaggery Invert #2 @ 60
6.5% Torrified Wheat
Bittering @ 60 to 22 IBU
30g Willamette @ 5
Lallemand London.
Drew a gravity sample today. FG is 1.004 which is 90% attenuation on London ale yeast!

First reaction: WTF? That's at least 20% over-attenuation.
 
I got the molasses/licorice flavor when I used one of the dark piloncillo raw sugars. Not a hint of it in either of these though. I'm contemplating brewing with that jaggery invert #2 today, if I can get a move-on. Just superior 2-row, a little flaked barley and the 1 lb #2 for about 10% of fermentables. Then hit it with a low attenuator like Windsor.

EDIT: 5:50pm brewing update

Brewed the following today. The LHBS was out of Windsor, so I went with London and mashed high.

INVERT 2 EXPERIMENTAL BREW
1.044-1.014, 3.9%, 25 IBU
81% Superior Pale Ale
12.5% Jaggery Invert #2 @ 60
6.5% Torrified Wheat
Bittering @ 60 to 22 IBU
30g Willamette @ 5
Lallemand London.

18 hours on gas. Here's what the colour looks like with that pound of #2 jaggery invert.

I'm bummed that it fermented out to 90%, as I wanted to assess the mouthfeel on a 3.9% beer with invert. Kveik yeast used on a previous batch may be the culprit. Anyways, it's a full-bodied beer at ~5% abv and 1.004 FG, which says something.

No British character to speak of at this point, so I don't know what the invert is providing besides colour. I'll check again in a week or so after its had a chance to mature in the keg.
20221120_151032.jpg
 
It's been a couple months, but here's how the #2 invert looks in that basic golden promise ale. It definitely imparts colour and even a little flavor to the beer. Hopped a little heavier, it could make a decent bitter (recall it over-attenuated). I'll be doing this again with Windsor as I'm determined to see how well this works in a higher bodied lower abv beer.

20230116_152440.jpg20230116_152603.jpg
 
And thanks guys. Now I know what to expect from homemade invert made this way, I'll do the following on my next batch:
  • Same inversion process (water+jaggery+acid, heat, b.soda at end). Extend cook time 30 - 45 min to obtain invert #3.
  • Add 5 - 10% UK C60 or C80.
  • Get the abv down below 4%
 
What about if one of these glasses Designed with head room and legal.
Of course, lined glasses are a different matter, but there was no sign of a line on the original photo, and even if it was lined, that pour would be short in almost any lined glass I know.
 
I'll have some updated observations to share soon regarding the DIY invert sugar preparation I documented in previous posts. I ended up using a half pound of my #1(ish) invert in a wheat saison, of all things. It turned out to be a really good beer, but in a brew like this there's nowhere for flaws to hide. I observed some things about the sugar and acid to baking soda ratios. It could be that less baking soda is needed...

20231126_155626.jpg
 
Last edited:
I’m giving dark mild another go, aiming for a full-bodied beer at 3.8% ABV and 23 IBUs. My focus is on hitting specific flavor notes, but I’m taking a non-traditional route with this one. The plan is to go with all-late hopping, omitting invert sugar, and I’m going with Windsor yeast for the low attenuation. Fingers crossed!

NO RULES DARK MILD 3.8% ABV 24 IBU
78% Superior pale malt
11.5% C75
8.5% Torrified Wheat
2% Black patent
3oz EKG @ 10 (5 gallon batch)
Windsor yeast
 
I’m giving dark mild another go, aiming for a full-bodied beer at 3.8% ABV and 23 IBUs. My focus is on hitting specific flavor notes, but I’m taking a non-traditional route with this one. The plan is to go with all-late hopping, omitting invert sugar, and I’m going with Windsor yeast for the low attenuation. Fingers crossed!

NO RULES DARK MILD 3.8% ABV 24 IBU
78% Superior pale malt
11.5% C75
8.5% Torrified Wheat
2% Black patent
3oz EKG @ 10 (5 gallon batch)
Windsor yeast
I'm not sure about the late EKGs. I don't think I've ever tasted a hoppy mild. All the rest looks good but I'd put the bittering charge in at the beginning.
On the other hand, you might just be inventing a new style "mild IPA" or something. Let us know how it turns out. As you say, there are no rules.
 
I'm not sure about the late EKGs. I don't think I've ever tasted a hoppy mild. All the rest looks good but I'd put the bittering charge in at the beginning.
On the other hand, you might just be inventing a new style "mild IPA" or something. Let us know how it turns out. As you say, there are no rules.

Thanks, I'll be sure to report back. I'm loading up on the late EKG just to see what happens. I think it brings a mild enough flavor that i'll probably get away with it.
 
My own house mild was the result of a misunderstanding. I'd have to look up the malt bill, but I had intended using a particular English hop at the beginning of the boil, but they didn't smell quite right and my only other open packet of hops was Harlequin.
Here's the misunderstanding. I had thought that any old hop, used early in the boil, at relatively low IBUs, in a malt dominant beer would make little difference. In fact it made a world of difference and is unlike any other mild I've ever made and suits my taste perfectly.
Sometimes the best results are unplanned.
 
My own house mild was the result of a misunderstanding. I'd have to look up the malt bill, but I had intended using a particular English hop at the beginning of the boil, but they didn't smell quite right and my only other open packet of hops was Harlequin.
Here's the misunderstanding. I had thought that any old hop, used early in the boil, at relatively low IBUs, in a malt dominant beer would make little difference. In fact it made a world of difference and is unlike any other mild I've ever made and suits my taste perfectly.
Sometimes the best results are unplanned.

I've never tried harlequin, but it sounds great. I could see the stonefruit flavors working well.
 
I’m giving dark mild another go, aiming for a full-bodied beer at 3.8% ABV and 23 IBUs. My focus is on hitting specific flavor notes, but I’m taking a non-traditional route with this one. The plan is to go with all-late hopping, omitting invert sugar, and I’m going with Windsor yeast for the low attenuation. Fingers crossed!

NO RULES DARK MILD 3.8% ABV 24 IBU
78% Superior pale malt
11.5% C75
8.5% Torrified Wheat
2% Black patent
3oz EKG @ 10 (5 gallon batch)
Windsor yeast
The milds I've had in the UK were not full bodied. They were also not thin, but definitely not full bodied. They were also not hoppy so yours is kind of a new invention that sounds pretty tasty to me.
 
The milds I've had in the UK were not full bodied. They were also not thin, but definitely not full bodied. They were also not hoppy so yours is kind of a new invention that sounds pretty tasty to me.
Google “American mild”. It’s been a US homebrew thing for probably 15 years at least.
 
The milds I've had in the UK were not full bodied. They were also not thin, but definitely not full bodied. They were also not hoppy so yours is kind of a new invention that sounds pretty tasty to me.

Thanks, Miraculix! I hear you on the hopping rate. I'm currently in Canada, so getting my hands on authentic milds is a bit tricky. That said, I’ve had dark milds in West Yorkshire, where I’m originally from, and they were definitely fuller-bodied than you’d expect from a typical 3.5% ABV beer. The beer I’m trying to replicate is no longer available, but I’m going off a description my relative provided. I started this journey after they tasted an amber ale I brewed with 15% C75 and told me it reminded them of their favorite dark mild from over 40 years ago.

I may have used the wrong term when I said "full-bodied." Maybe "smooth and creamy" would be a better way to describe it. I’m not sure if I can fully capture it, but I’m definitely giving it a shot!
 
Google “American mild”. It’s been a US homebrew thing for probably 15 years at least.
http://www.mildmonth.com/2015/03/an-american-mild.html
I wonder if that is representative.
Interesting take. American milds seem not too distant from English milds. There were a few pale milds, but many were dark: 20+ SRM. Gales of Horndean did both a light mild and a dark mild. Low hopping levels, low alcohol malt forward. But some were coloured with brewers caramel or dark brewing sugar rather than dark malts. The mid-20th century mild, I think was brewed for a purpose- to rehydrate miners and steel workers after a long hot shift. Served cool rather than cold and swilled down by the gallon. Historical milds were much stronger and brews Like Sarah Hughes Ruby Mild at 6% (nor reduced, I think) would be an example of the tail ends of that style. Mild basically died out as heavy industry and hard, manual work died out. It also had a bad reputation as some publicans, it's alleged, would throw the dregs and slops into the mild barrel. I hope that is apocryphal.
 
looks tasty, Dunc! Are you able to share the recipe?
You're taking your life in your hands, there, @rhys333 . @DuncB 's going to tell you to temper your malt bill with equal parts Aurora and Shepherd's Delight, with a healthy dose of Redback and optional Supernova. Give it a bit of colour with some Eclipse and chuck in an ounce of Tangerine Dream at the start of the boil.

I love N.Z. ingredients. :bigmug:
 
Last edited:
At 4½% abv, it's tending towards the stronger end. The colour's about right. Mild should have a decent head, but shouldn't be unduly fizzy. This one's been in the bottle a year and is the last of it's batch. Still tastes ok, but was better when it was younger.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250209_181147.jpg
    IMG_20250209_181147.jpg
    2.4 MB
  • IMG_20250209_181229.jpg
    IMG_20250209_181229.jpg
    2.6 MB
Holy chit. 30 minutes ago I received a message from the former head brewer at the UK brewery in question. I know how they brewed their dark mild and apparently I was completely wrong. Except... no invert sugar!
 
Whatever's in that small pail it's definitely not like malted oats I've used, including GNO.
Just look like barley malt of some kind to me...

Cheers!
 
Hey everyone,

I'd like to brew a batch of beer based on a dark mild that my dad used to enjoy back in the old country. If I can get it close, I'll brew it again for the parents over Christmas. He mentions Timothy Taylor's Dark Mild as a favorite, and describes it as having the following characteristics:

- Dark ruby, almost black. Slightly lighter in colour than Guinness.
- Thick creamy head, and very good head retention.
- Good body and mouthfeel. Definitely not thin or watery (as many attempts at mild can be)
- Chocolatey in flavor, somewhat like cold hot chocolate. Slightly sweet, smooth tasting and neither roasty or hoppy.

Now, there's also a good description on the Timothy Taylor website, which gives more insight. It describes some subtle flavors that he may not be picking up:
https://www.timothytaylor.co.uk/beer/dark-mild
Based on all of this, I've come up with the following draft recipe. Absent is brown malt, which I considered adding if I were to reduce the chocolate malt by a percent or so. I'm considering mashing high. Very high in fact, around 160F to get the body. I realize this breaks with convention, but may be necessary to get the appropriate mouthfeel in such a low abv beer. I could cheat and use rye, but would rather not.

DARK MILD
1.042-1.013 (3.8% abv), 20 IBU, 18 SRM
80% Golden Promise
9% Flaked barley
7% C80
4% UK Chocolate malt
1.5 oz Willamette @ 60 (5.5 gal)
WY 1469 (or 1968, which I have on hand)

I appreciate your feedback and suggestions, or advice based on experience brewing this tricky style. Thanks in advance!
Looks good to me. I’d ditch the flaked barley and use 89% base malt. If the beer isn’t sweet enough or feels too light, use more Crystal Malt.
 
I need time to defrost before catching up. I just completed brew day in unexpected weather conditions. Yesterday was calm and sunny. Today, I was treated to extreme high winds, snow, and -20 degrees C (-4 F). On the upside, it didn't take long to chill the wort. :)
 
Last edited:
Holy chit. 30 minutes ago I received a message from the former head brewer at the UK brewery in question. I know how they brewed their dark mild and apparently I was completely wrong. Except... no invert sugar!

So, you're going to share a recipe soon, from a former head brewer of a UK brewery, right?
 
So, you're going to share a recipe soon, from a former head brewer of a UK brewery, right?

Lion Dark Mild, brewed in Blackburn, Lancashire. He mentions it was quite a while ago and is relying on memory. The grist was mild ale malt with about 10% flaked maize (corn), and brewer's caramel for color adjustment. He doesn’t recall using black malt. The original gravity was around 1.032, and the beer ended up just over 3% ABV. The hops were low-alpha Fuggles and Goldings (around 2%), with an estimated 1 oz per gallon. The house yeast, which had been used for decades but is sadly no longer available, was key to the beer’s distinctive character.

Anecdotally, my family member who enjoyed Lion Mild in the 1960s, drank an amber ale of mine with about 13% C75 in the grist and noted that it tasted like Lion Mild. This suggests to me that deep caramel, toffee, or burnt sugar flavors were likely present, possibly coming from the brewer's caramel.
 
Brown or Amber malt is my guess.

Nope. It's melanoidin malt. I added it because my amber ale mentioned above had a small amount of melanoidin along with the C75. I know it doesn't belong, but my goal is to replicate the flavor profile that led to the mild ale comparison, even if I'm using a different approach to get there.
 
Back
Top