This has 80 IBUs and it's dry hopped.
I don't think a Cold IPA would do well if it was judged under 19B California Common. BJCP actually recommends entering it under 21B Specialty IPA as long as it can be distinguished from 21A.So beer fermented with lager yeast at ale temps is not steam beer anymore. Now we just call it something different.
Agreed.I brewed a few IPA using lager yeast under pressure and it is always a success. Its a kind of beer that I really enjoy. I used the Lallemand Diamond lager yeast each time with success. You should not care that its not an official style or whatever... give it a try its damn good ! If you dont use gelatin or lager for a long period it will stay hazy for a few weeks.... the one on the picture used gelatin. Citra/bru-1 hops... super tasty...
I guess I'm an old fart now because I refuse to relent on the semantics. IPA = ale AKA top fermented. Fermenting it cold with lager yeast disqualifies it from being called an IPA. It's the same reason Black IPA is bull plop.
I guess I'm an old fart now because I refuse to relent on the semantics. IPA = ale AKA top fermented. Fermenting it cold with lager yeast disqualifies it from being called an IPA. It's the same reason Black IPA is bull plop.
Total truth here.I guess I'm an old fart now because I refuse to relent on the semantics. IPA = ale AKA top fermented. Fermenting it cold with lager yeast disqualifies it from being called an IPA. It's the same reason Black IPA is bull plop.
Well, I finally made my way to Wayfinder Brewing in Portland to try their Original Cold IPA. What a treat. Other than the obvious use of Pilsner malt, it is different from an IPL or a Brut IPA. The rice adjunct and 7% ABV along with the moderate use of “C” hops makes this beer shine. I plan on making this beer in the winter, but with pale malt instead of Pilsner to get further from an IPL taste profile. Cheers!
View attachment 768395
Don't get me wrong here. I'm not saying it can't be a great beer and I'm not taking anything away from DrGMG. I'm just railing on the style name as an aside. The misappropriation of beer style names is just a pet peeve of mine. I had a 17 year career in tech standards and naming conventions and it's hard to shake that off.Call it the way you want... or we could say that DrGMG brewed a fantastic beer and he just want to share his recipe so his fellow brewers can try it.
My thoughts as well Bobby. The BJCP 21B category could get out of hand if new styles aren’t appropriately captured in the name. When I get a chance to brew this beer, it will probably be with Chico yeast, pale malt, significant flaked rice and dry with a low FG. I feel that would be in keeping with originators intentions. It would be different from an IPL, which I have never cared for.Don't get me wrong here. I'm not saying it can't be a great beer and I'm not taking anything away from DrGMG. I'm just railing on the style name as an aside. The misappropriation of beer style names is just a pet peeve of mine. I had a 17 year career in tech standards and naming conventions and it's hard to shake that off.
But Bobby, isn't that same thing at the heart of IPAs in general?Don't get me wrong here. I'm not saying it can't be a great beer and I'm not taking anything away from DrGMG. I'm just railing on the style name as an aside. The misappropriation of beer style names is just a pet peeve of mine. I had a 17 year career in tech standards and naming conventions and it's hard to shake that off.
I guess I'm an old fart now because I refuse to relent on the semantics. IPA = ale AKA top fermented. Fermenting it cold with lager yeast disqualifies it from being called an IPA. It's the same reason Black IPA is bull plop.
I hear you. I think this is much better than the brut IPA though. We'll see if this style sticks.
Incorporate the word "Hazy" and it will stick. Not to mention, it matches the appearance.
........I look at beer names like Horse names in a race- call 'em whatever the hell you want to- it's how it performs that counts to me.
But Bobby, isn't that same thing at the heart of IPAs in general?
My expectation didn't match the realization, yet it held vastly more fidelity to the true origin of IPA than anything we serve here on this side of the pond.
original intent of English style IPAs.
Makes me think of South Park and Super Troopers. Dang i am just so immature!I'm just calling shenanigan's
Pretty much in agreement with everything. Just pointing out a subtle exception.American IPA was an extension of the original intent of English style IPAs. It was a decidedly more hop forward ale than anything before it. When it was Americanized, the hops got more potent but it was still pale in color and fermented with ale yeast. It wasn't filled with oxymoron like Black Pale or Lager Ale.
I have nothing against the beer itself, experimentation or pushing boundaries. I'm just calling shenanigan's on the lazy naming.
I agree that calling it Black IPA is a stretch, but named as a new or provisional style (Cascadian Ale) is both accurate and appropriate to the region where it originated.
I had this one recently. I mean Iron Maiden, right? Really cool looking can. I have to say it was good.
View attachment 769748View attachment 769749
I LOVE Iron Maiden! But The Trooper IPA had a great bottle label and the caps were arguably cooler. However the beer itself was pretty crappy, sadly...I had this one recently. I mean Iron Maiden, right? Really cool looking can. I have to say it was good.
I've had their Trooper Ale and thought it was pretty damn good!
Now, if I can just get a few cans of Rush's new beers...............![]()