Check out Kveik yeast for good attenuation and fast fermentation at higher temps (up to 95f I've read!) with clean flavor. Its also not diastaticus so no fear of cross-batch contamination.
I chose 70 (maybe it was 68) because I was gone for a month while it did it's thing and figured it would maybe go bad if I left it up in the 80s until I returned. I don't think it's infected. It looked fine when I kegged it. I was just expecting more hops and less tart I guess. I have no reference point from which to judge a saison.
I use this yeast quite a bit, and it definitely does fine above 80, even for extended periods of time. I have done many batches in my basement (ambient ~80 °F) for a month or so.
One thing that I have found is that the yeast seems to be more expressive when re-pitched from a slurry on the second or third generation. I am not sure if anyone else has noticed that, but I get my best results on re-pitches.
This is something I read all over the itnernet again and again. Looks like this yeast is still recovering from being dried for the first few batches and needs its time to fully shine.
Sounds like a solid plan!Wonder if it would make sense to pick up a packet of Belle, do a small 1Liter starter, separate it into mason jars, and then do secondary starters off those for future brews. Makes it 2nd-3rd generation of the yeast (albeit from a clean 24-36 hour starter instead of full primary fermentation), and obviously benefit of having extra yeast now stockpiled.
This is what i do with most of my liquid yeasts. I build a 2liter starter off a smack pack, and then store it away in equal sized 100-125b cell slurries, and then build each brew's pitch off those
Man, if you could do this with a split batch, one with a 4th generation starter and one directly from the package, you would be my hero.Wonder if it would make sense to pick up a packet of Belle, do a small 1Liter starter, separate it into mason jars, and then do secondary starters off those for future brews. Makes it 2nd-3rd generation of the yeast (albeit from a clean 24-36 hour starter instead of full primary fermentation), and obviously benefit of having extra yeast now stockpiled.
This is what i do with most of my liquid yeasts. I build a 2liter starter off a smack pack, and then store it away in equal sized 100-125b cell slurries, and then build each brew's pitch off those
Instead, you could add a little glucoamylase to your mash, and wort!
One of our club's brewers has been doing that to all his beers now, since he brewed a Brut last year. Surprisingly none are overly dry, actually.
Speaking of Diastaticus, WY3711 is allegedly known for digesting fermenters, if left to it.![]()
I made my first Saisons with 3711 because of its reputation for attenuating despite low temps--I didn't have precise control yet. I've also made session beers with it mashing at 160, using munich, amber malt, and special B which finished at 1.004. Also, BelgIAN [] Imperial Stout that also finished that low. I've found Belle to behave similarly in all these respects, and recognize a certain tartness sometimes.
I agree that Dupont (3724?) has a better flavor profile, but many say it will stall at 1.030 if you don't ramp temp up toward the end of fermentation. I've only used it since getting my temp control set up, so no issues with that personally. Alternatively, as mentioned before, you can use Dupont and then add a little Belle or 3711 to make sure it finishes, which it will.
Now I want to brew a Saison! I was thinking of possibly doing a Dubbel, but maybe a Saison instead. I have a smidge of D-180, and a full pouch of D-90, so maybe a dark Saison for the winter. hmm...