I used 10% table sugar in a Wit which we cracked today. Very tasty, it really lightened up the body like I wanted. 22 days grain to glass, too.
The point of not adding all the fermentables at first is because it will overwhelm the yeast due to viscosity of the wort and because the yeast will choose to metabolise the simple sugars (glucose, sucrose, fructose) in preference over the maltose. These latter sugars (which come from the malts) will be left unfermented, resulting in cloying sweetness and a heavy body.
Just one: Newbies are soooo cute!
Cheers!![]()
You have to remember that people that sell Beer supplies are out to sell you stuff like Malt extracts, hops, bottling sugar, air locks, finnings, hydrometers, racking canes, etc.
Just like the dumb-asses in the wine industries, they want to confer a certain purist, bitchy, persnickitiness, so that you'll gladly buy their over priced crap.
You can make a perfectly palatable beer using just sugar and some other cheap (off the grocery store shelf) stuff like, flour, cocoa, coffee, tea, molasses, sorghum etc.
You will need to get some good yeast and some decent hops to your liking.
I make a 5 gallon batch of great beer for less than 3 bucks. But then again, I am no snob, I just like getting drunk as cheap as possible.
I like a light beer that I can drink a lot of without getting too hammered or consuming too many calories.
A guy that knows what he is doing can get every thing he needs except hops and yeast between Home Depot and the super market. But then the brewer supplies companies don't get their cut.
I make a 5 gallon batch of great beer for less than 3 bucks. But then again, I am no snob, I just like getting drunk as cheap as possible.
I like a light beer that I can drink a lot of without getting too hammered or consuming too many calories.
If you're not paying for malted barley from those greedy brewing supply companies, you're kinda actually not making beer. Maybe you'd be better off over at prisonhoochtalk.com.![]()
If you're not paying for malted barley from those greedy brewing supply companies, you're kinda actually not making beer. Maybe you'd be better off over at prisonhoochtalk.com.![]()
If you're adding sugar because you're too cheap to buy malt, your running a risk. Maybe it'll work for you, maybe it won't. If you're adding sugar in addition to plenty of malt (extract or grain, doesn't matter) and it's appropriate for the style, you should be good to go.
[I just thought of this] I wonder if if that taste is from the yeast having to invert the sucrose while the yeast is stressed already? Lack of nutrients, bad temperature range, way underpitched, etc. And if the yeast was happy and healthy the same recipe would be just fine? Might be worth an experiment; make a sugar beer and add yeast nutrient to half of it.
IMHE, if you can actively control ferm temps and ferment on the low side, you shouldn't see any and you can go with pretty high percentages of sugar. I'm not even sure if it's yeast stress. I think yeast just churn through these simple sugars fast and fart out the cider. Controlling temps keeps them in check.