I consider it a victory for the world of beer that those ads are even deemed necessary. What those ads tell me is that AB is resigned to the fact that their outmoded flagship product has a burgeoning image problem; the days of ever-expanding market share are over, and they’re just desperately trying to cling to their existing customers.
"Desperately trying to cling?"
OK, let's get a couple of things straight. AB-InBev is a massive, multi-billion dollar, multinational corporation with a huge stable of products that are popular worldwide, and over a hundred thousand employees. It's a huge business.
Huge businesses advertise.
So we accept the premise that no matter what, they're going to be advertising. Of course they are. As big as they are, they still have competitors, and so they must advertise and fight for their marketshare.
Now, put yourself in their marketing department's shoes. You look at the numbers and recognize that while worldwide beer consumption is still expanding, your own share of it is not expanding as quickly. You're losing ground to upstart craft beers.
So, as the marketing director, what do you do? Do you walk up to the board of directors and say, "Screw it, people are finally realizing craft beer is better, let's close up shop, lay off 155,000 employees, tank the stock price, and call it a day."?
No. Your job is to come up with advertisements. So you come up with ads that reassure your existing customer base, while simultaneously discouraging them from dipping their toes into the "craft beer" waters.
How is that "desperation?" That's just advertising. They have to come up with SOMETHING, so doesn't it only make sense that they produce ads that target the shifting realities of the marketplace?
I suspect no matter WHAT they put out as advertising (or is it the fact that they're advertising at all - as they've been doing for decades?), you'd still characterize it as "desperate thrashing and writhing."