moreb33rplz
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2014
- Messages
- 685
- Reaction score
- 379
Now that's a tasty looking beer right der
This is my hell brew lol Going to rebrew with a very healthy pitch of wlp838 next time and see how it comes out. This batch was close but it still needs to be done rightNow that's a tasty looking beer right der
I concur.Now that's a tasty looking beer right der
Now you got me thinking this might be the route I go. How are you liking the conical fermenter? I heard they're pretty flimsy.This is my hell brew lol Going to rebrew with a very healthy pitch of wlp838 next time and see how it comes out. This batch was close but it still needs to be done right![]()
I enjoy mine quite a bit. I'm interested to hear if @rtstrider has any comparison to the original gen 3.I concur.
Now you got me thinking this might be the route I go. How are you liking the conical fermenter? I heard they're pretty flimsy.
It's basically a big soda bottle. I love it and the pressure fermenting capability. The fact I can get lagers fermented, cold crashed, packaged, and ready to drink in around 14 days is huge! I followed the kegland pressure fermenting article and start around 54F for 24 hours and bump up 4F each day until it hits 66F then let it ride. It's set to 15psi the whole way. Also the container at the bottom has made yeast harvesting easier too!I concur.
Now you got me thinking this might be the route I go. How are you liking the conical fermenter? I heard they're pretty flimsy.
I haven't used a Gen 3 so I can't really comment too much there. I will say there was a learning curve moving to the Gen 4 from a 3 tier system. One of the issues I ran into right out of the gate was insanely high efficiency. The first 2 brews were right over 90% and were like drinking rocket fuel lol Had to dial back the crush a bit to help with circulation and lower efficiency.I enjoy mine quite a bit. I'm interested to hear if @rtstrider has any comparison to the original gen 3.
Can I ask...flimsy as compared to what? It's no SS vessel, of course, but for a pressure-capable every day fermentor mine have taken quite a bit of use with no issue. The occasional leaking post to chase down and tighten but it's solid. It's light and you can accidentally push it around a little but with a thin PET fermentor I think that comes with the territory. If you want to own it forever then buy SS. I don't regret the purchase at all, though. And I like these because you get to watch the magic happen. Not limited to just sniffing the airlock any more![]()
Sorry, that question should have been elaborated on. I have used the PET Better bottles. I guess I should have clarified my question more. I heard the conical fermenter with the collection container/hardware seemed flimsy. I currently only use glass carboys, but am looking for something I can pressure ferment in, pressure transfer, but yeast harvesting with the collection container is a huge bonus for me. I would definitely have to build a bigger fermentation chamber because I am using an old freezer.I enjoy mine quite a bit. I'm interested to hear if @rtstrider has any comparison to the original gen 3.
Can I ask...flimsy as compared to what? It's no SS vessel, of course, but for a pressure-capable every day fermentor mine have taken quite a bit of use with no issue. The occasional leaking post to chase down and tighten but it's solid. It's light and you can accidentally push it around a little but with a thin PET fermentor I think that comes with the territory. If you want to own it forever then buy SS. I don't regret the purchase at all, though. And I like these because you get to watch the magic happen. Not limited to just sniffing the airlock any more![]()
The pressure fermenting and pressure transferring is a huge bonus. I am somewhat considering the non-collection variety because I am height constrained in my fermentation chamber.It's basically a big soda bottle. I love it and the pressure fermenting capability. The fact I can get lagers fermented, cold crashed, packaged, and ready to drink in around 14 days is huge! I followed the kegland pressure fermenting article and start around 54F for 24 hours and bump up 4F each day until it hits 66F then let it ride. It's set to 15psi the whole way. Also the container at the bottom has made yeast harvesting easier too!
Is this about the Brewzilla in general here? I brewed my saison on my OG Grainfather in February and the same saison a few weeks ago. My efficiency was so high on the Brewzilla Gen 4 I thought I had the final water volume wrong. WILD. I think I hit 90% without paying much attention to it.I haven't used a Gen 3 so I can't really comment too much there. I will say there was a learning curve moving to the Gen 4 from a 3 tier system. One of the issues I ran into right out of the gate was insanely high efficiency. The first 2 brews were right over 90% and were like drinking rocket fuel lol Had to dial back the crush a bit to help with circulation and lower efficiency.
Let us know how it turns out. I have some 34/70 sitting here.i have a bunch of 2 row hanging around i am going to try this with 34/70 and see how it comes out
I'd like to chime in and recommend Omega German Lager 1 DKO. I've been using that strain and have had really good results. 34/70 is hit or miss and WLP830 is decent warm fermented. That DKO strain, fermented low, is nice! I always get a weird twang when fermenting 34/70 and WLP830 low regardless of pitch rate. That strain is quickly becoming my house lager strain! It also repitches well too which is not something I've experienced with 34/70.Let us know how it turns out. I have some 34/70 sitting here.
I will see if my local shop has it. Or I might be waiting until winter-ish time to order it. Thanks for the suggestion. I guess that one is the engineered version. OYL437I'd like to chime in and recommend Omega German Lager 1 DKO. I've been using that strain and have had really good results. 34/70 is hit or miss and WLP830 is decent warm fermented. That DKO strain, fermented low, is nice! I always get a weird twang when fermenting 34/70 and WLP830 low regardless of pitch rate. That strain is quickly becoming my house lager strain! It also repitches well too which is not something I've experienced with 34/70.
Totally fine, just looking for more detailSorry, that question should have been elaborated on. I have used the PET Better bottles. I guess I should have clarified my question more. I heard the conical fermenter with the collection container/hardware seemed flimsy. I currently only use glass carboys, but am looking for something I can pressure ferment in, pressure transfer, but yeast harvesting with the collection container is a huge bonus for me. I would definitely have to build a bigger fermentation chamber because I am using an old freezer.
Sorry for the confusion, but I actually meant the past version of the Fermzilla tri-conical. There is a 3.0 version with an older style collection jar that everybody hates. I've got that one. They recently released a new 3.2 Fermzilla version with an updated collection jar. You've got the updated version and I was curious if you have experience with the old version to compare. Thanks for all the other info too!I haven't used a Gen 3 so I can't really comment too much there. I will say there was a learning curve moving to the Gen 4 from a 3 tier system. One of the issues I ran into right out of the gate was insanely high efficiency. The first 2 brews were right over 90% and were like drinking rocket fuel lol Had to dial back the crush a bit to help with circulation and lower efficiency.
I assume they mean Mittelfruh. That would be my choice too, but I think Hersbrucker would work just fine if you prefer it.Back to the recipe. It is calling for Hallertau. Is this Mittelfruh or Hersbrucker? I presume not Traditional, since it is listed at 3.8 AAU which is closest to the current Mittelfruh offerings.
This is the only version I've ever played around with. So far I absolutely love it!Totally fine, just looking for more detailThe plastic is overall thinner than a PET Better Bottle but it's thicker in the right places to me. It's true that it's light and you can push the whole thing around some if you're not careful. If you're mindful of your basic physics and use sense instead of force, though, then it's not a problem. Overall construction feels sturdy for the weight. I also think the hardware collection on the latest version of the Fermzilla looks like a big improvement. That was actually my question to rtstrider but I should have also been clearer myself
Let me see if I can fix it.
Sorry for the confusion, but I actually meant the past version of the Fermzilla tri-conical. There is a 3.0 version with an older style collection jar that everybody hates. I've got that one. They recently released a new 3.2 Fermzilla version with an updated collection jar. You've got the updated version and I was curious if you have experience with the old version to compare. Thanks for all the other info too!
Yep that's the bioengineered version and the best version of 34/70 yet imo. Omega did a really good job with that strain! I feel your yeast shipping pains. Living in FL really limits the time of year you can get yeast shipped down to a few months.I will see if my local shop has it. Or I might be waiting until winter-ish time to order it. Thanks for the suggestion. I guess that one is the engineered version. OYL437
I've never used the white labs variant, but, I've used Omega Bayern which is supposedly the same strain. That's a good strain! I do want to get my hands on one of the WLP860 dry yeast packs and prop it up in a starter to see how it stacks upHave you used WLP860 Munich Helles? Not much info out here on HBT.
Have you used WLP860 Munich Helles? Not much info out here on HBT.
Basically same as @rtstrider on this one. That's supposedly the Augustiner strain and it makes a really nice helles. I saw the dry version go up on Yeastman a couple weeks ago and Morebeer has it now too. I am very excited about that. I'm sure more stores will pick it up soon.I've never used the white labs variant, but, I've used Omega Bayern which is supposedly the same strain. That's a good strain! I do want to get my hands on one of the WLP860 dry yeast packs and prop it up in a starter to see how it stacks up
Yep that's the bioengineered version and the best version of 34/70 yet imo. Omega did a really good job with that strain! I feel your yeast shipping pains. Living in FL really limits the time of year you can get yeast shipped down to a few months.
My local shop has WLP860 in stock. I might have to try it out. If it works out, I might harvest and do a side by side with the dry yeast and see if I can tell any differences. Pretty busy summer planned, but hope I can at least get this batch done with the liquid yeast.Basically same as @rtstrider on this one. That's supposedly the Augustiner strain and it makes a really nice helles. I saw the dry version go up on Yeastman a couple weeks ago and Morebeer has it now too. I am very excited about that. I'm sure more stores will pick it up soon.
9 lb | US - Pale 2-Row | 37 | 1.8 | 88.9% | |
0.50 lb | American - Carapils (Dextrine Malt) | 33 | 1.8 | 4.9% | |
0.50 lb | Munich Malt | 36.8 | 7.87 | 4.9% | |
0.13 lb | Weyermann - Melanoidin | 34.5 | 27 | 1.2% |
1.25 oz | Hallertau Mittelfruh | Pellet | 3.75 | Boil | 60 min | 18.4 | 100% |
White Labs - Munich Helles Yeast WLP860 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I got lucky and had a brewery open about 6 doors down from the house. They got the ward labs report and our water is pretty much bare as is so it's perfect for light brews and lagers. The most TDS I've ever pulled unfiltered is in the high 30's which is insane. I moved to only using tap water with campden and adjusting ph with lactic acid. One of our local breweries is pulling in gold in FL beer championships and they really do nothing with the water is what I found out. If it's good enough to pull gold state wide then it's good enough for my homebreweryMethod: All Grain
Style: Munich Helles
Boil Time: 90 min
Batch Size: 5.5 gallons (fermentor volume)
Pre Boil Size: 7.8 gallons
Post Boil Size: 5.5 gallons
Post Boil Gravity: 1.051 (recipe based estimate)
Efficiency: 75% (brew house)
Calories: 169 calories (Per 12oz)
Carbs: 19.2 g (Per 12oz)
Original Gravity: 1.051
Final Gravity: 1.015
ABV (standard): 4.7%
IBU (tinseth): 18.4
SRM (morey): 4.2
9 lb US - Pale 2-Row 37 1.8 88.9% 0.50 lb American - Carapils (Dextrine Malt) 33 1.8 4.9% 0.50 lb Munich Malt 36.8 7.87 4.9% 0.13 lb Weyermann - Melanoidin 34.5 27 1.2%
1.25 oz Hallertau Mittelfruh Pellet 3.75 Boil 60 min 18.4 100%
White Labs - Munich Helles Yeast WLP860
Amount: 1 Each Cost: Attenuation (avg): 70% Flocculation: Medium Optimum Temp: 48 - 52 °F
From Brewer's Friend. I just use the water at Publix, have been for over 10 years and never had an issue. Should I do anything to adjust the recipe or the water? I have never had the water tested, but the old homebrew shop was adamant that it was the best way to get good results with low effort and I never changed. I will do some research on my fermentation schedule.
That's awesome. We are on Well. So no chlorine, but it's pretty hard and the pH is definitely way out of whack. I may send it off. Anything I can do to make brewday more simple and less money.I got lucky and had a brewery open about 6 doors down from the house. They got the ward labs report and our water is pretty much bare as is so it's perfect for light brews and lagers. The most TDS I've ever pulled unfiltered is in the high 30's which is insane. I moved to only using tap water with campden and adjusting ph with lactic acid. One of our local breweries is pulling in gold in FL beer championships and they really do nothing with the water is what I found out. If it's good enough to pull gold state wide then it's good enough for my homebrewery![]()
Have you used WLP860 Munich Helles? Not much info out here on HBT.
This recipe was well received by the European family. I would probably make it again with some German Pilsner next time. This recipe is pretty cheap to make with the 2-row which is nice.WLP860 dry yeast has kind of become my house yeast for German malt forward beer. Though have yet to use it on a Helles, but that will change on Saturday.
I just kegged this recipe using wlp860 dry. The mash was 90 min at 149. I did make a 2L 1.040 starter since that was significantly cheaper than buying 2 dry packs. Wlp860 dry has a very specific nose on it. Its a very sweet nose and really mutes everything but that malt when it ferments. At least that was from the fermenter samples. Its been in the keg a little over 2 days now and this is really bitter, and almost no nose, but clearing. My guess is lagering will probably smooth this out but we will see. I probably got a sample of all the crud thats supposed to settle out. Lagering has an odd way of bringing everything together.Have you used WLP860 Munich Helles? Not much info out here on HBT.
I get a lot of fruit from the WLP860.I just kegged this recipe using wlp860 dry. The mash was 90 min at 149. I did make a 2L 1.040 starter since that was significantly cheaper than buying 2 dry packs. Wlp860 dry has a very specific nose on it. Its a very sweet nose and really mutes everything but that malt when it ferments. At least that was from the fermenter samples. Its been in the keg a little over 2 days now and this is really bitter, and almost no nose, but clearing. My guess is lagering will probably smooth this out but we will see. I probably got a sample of all the crud thats supposed to settle out. Lagering has an odd way of bringing everything together.
Anywho I'm going to dose with gelatin tomorrow and let ride until King of the Hill comes out. So far this time is the only time Ive brewed this recipe without something going massively wrong. Both this and Bells Two Hearted are my hell batches. Every.....single.....time
That said the sample from earlier was very crisp!
This beer is named King of the Helles! Ill post an update once this gets officially tapped![]()
Finally nailed this recipe! This recipe is really good! Wlp860 is a bit much on the malt side of things. Both on the aroma and flavor. Next time Im going to try and hefty pitch of wlp838 and see what happens since that is what the recipe calls for. The only changes I made this time was the mash temp (149F for 90 min) and the yeast (wlp860 dry)
View attachment 881745
What did you not like about wlp860?I believe 838 or 833 would do really well in this recipe. We did enjoy it with 860, but I am putting that yeast as probably my least favorite German Lager yeast until further notice.
For this recipe we noted...What did you not like about wlp860?
For me it leans way too much into the malt in both flavor and aroma. Its malt first then everything else a close 3rd or 4th (so malty it takes first and 2nd place lol). Ill definitely have to prop up some 838 from the freezer bank and try again!
We really exacerbated the esters of 860 the second time by warm fermenting it.I didnt get fruity esters but I got malt everything lol Ill have to try 838 for sure!
Maybe that's why I didnt get many esters. It was fermented at 54FWe really exacerbated the esters of 860 the second time by warm fermenting it.
Maybe that's why I didnt get many esters. It was fermented at 54F