dontman
Well-Known Member
You know what, at this point I am just going to back out of this. But first I am prepared to say that I over reacted to the one post I quoted above calling for the boycott. I actually reread looking for more and there was only one other post that I saw where he said that even though the competitor is a nice guy with good helpful employees that he was not going to shop there anymore.
I will say though, Ed, that you really can not hold it against someone for drawing a wrong conclusion when you spoon feed chosen details and withhold others.
I can't believe in this litigious day and age that a company can officially approve a location for distribution rights in writing, sign a contract to that effect, have you spend the thousands of dollars in start up costs and other fees, and then simply refuse to honor the contract and renege on the deal. And then demand that you sign a revised contract nullifying the first one? Is this specifically what you are saying your distributor did to you?
Because if that, specifically, is what you are saying happened to you, then you have every right to be outraged and even litigious.
I will say though, Ed, that you really can not hold it against someone for drawing a wrong conclusion when you spoon feed chosen details and withhold others.
I can't believe in this litigious day and age that a company can officially approve a location for distribution rights in writing, sign a contract to that effect, have you spend the thousands of dollars in start up costs and other fees, and then simply refuse to honor the contract and renege on the deal. And then demand that you sign a revised contract nullifying the first one? Is this specifically what you are saying your distributor did to you?
Because if that, specifically, is what you are saying happened to you, then you have every right to be outraged and even litigious.