• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Your Ultimate Car

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I have a

IMG_2546.jpg


And a

coche-739968364.jpg


I would like a ........(will probably happen sometime)

fury9.jpg
 
I just as easily substitute a Landrover like that one instead of a ScoutII. Landrovers are a bit more spendy though.
 
I have an unhealthy love for all things Pontiac.

I'll second that! I had a lot of fun building this 1976 Trans Am Pro-tour! This is the car I always wanted as a kid, and it performs better now than the engineers at Pontiac ever could have conceived of in 1976, LOL! Poncho motors need only apply! She's got a 461 stroker (1972 Pontiac 400 block bored .030" over with a 4.25" stroke forged crank), Tremec TKO-600 5-speed into a Moser 12 bolt with 3.73's. She's a real mover!


DSC_2311.jpg


DSC02543.jpg


DSC01789-2.jpg


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-yocbg0DKE"]YouTube - Pontiac T/A interior video clip[/ame]
 
Seeing that money is no object, then I could afford a good chiropractor after riding a sexy beast like this all day...

0612-stcp-dec-27-blog-pic.jpg


and next to that in my garage would be a HD road king
FLHR_FLHRI_Road_King_1.jpg


and every good ol' boy needs a pick-em-up truck. I'm madly in love with the 1960-66 Chevy C10 stepside trucks (63 pictured)
2e9f_1.JPG
 
The problem I have with "super cars" is that anything less than 700hp is a waste of time. I can make a naturally aspirated, carbureted 383 Chevy put out 535 hp with my eyes closed. Add two stage nitrous and I'm already at 700. Again, out of a naturally aspirated, carbureted engine. For under $10k.

A supercharged LS-7 can put out 700hp+ for about $30k. So to charge $350k for something like a Murcielago which only puts out 640hp seems silly regardless of how well the car handles.
 
The problem I have with "super cars" is that anything less than 700hp is a waste of time. I can make a naturally aspirated, carbureted 383 Chevy put out 535 hp with my eyes closed. Add two stage nitrous and I'm already at 700. Again, out of a naturally aspirated, carbureted engine. For under $10k.

A supercharged LS-7 can put out 700hp+ for about $30k. So to charge $350k for something like a Murcielago which only puts out 640hp seems silly regardless of how well the car handles.

Dude, the people who design supercars spend more money making a car STOP than you are talking about to make it go. 800BHP doesn't do you any good if you can't go around corners, stop, beat the wind resistance etc. If you want to further your argument, then talk about the Z06 Carvette, a true supercar for under $80K!
 
The point is - They are not supposed to make sense!

There is no need to spend more than 100k on a car. It's the fact that you can.
Lets face it. I could build a road car that does 0-60 in under 3.5 seconds for under $25K

I have driven a $14k car that does it in around 4.
The bank manager wouldn't let me buy it.
 
If you want to further your argument, then talk about the Z06 Carvette, a true supercar for under $80K!

Thank you for making my point for me.
If one of these companies (Ferrari, Lambo, etc.) are going to charge 4x as much for their car, there should be 4x as much performance. Apart from the Bugatti Veyron, I can't say any current supercar is doing that.
 
Can I add a couple?

I love unimogs.......they're just so cool!
unimog44_000.jpg



And, in honor of another RHH song...

A '65 Lincoln Continental with suicide doors......it's really first rate

L10.jpg
 
Back
Top