• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

why does kegged commercial beer always taste better than bottled ?

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

fluketamer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
1,969
Reaction score
2,568
not talking homebrew here. i already started enough trouble with my dark grains. lol

when i was younger ( in the 80's) before legal drinking age. i always heard kegged budweiser tastes better than canned . then when i tried my first kegged beer (still underage) i found it was def true. kegged beer always tasted better than canned. splurging on a keg back then didnt just mean a lot of beer it meant much better beer.

and it still does. side by side the keg tasts better than the cans. anyone else notice this.

i bring this up cause i recently had a merman ipa on tap and it was really really good to the point where i descided i have to make this.
then i had one in the can and it tastes like cr@p.

why?

why does commercial kegged beer taste so much better than commercial canned beer. ?

isnt it the same beer going into the bottle as the keg?

anyone who worked on the inside know?

am i missing something simple.

(being politically correct, ) i have a feeling i know why MY bottles dont taste as good as MY kegs but why does this happen at the macro level? whats going on?

just curious.

i am not comparing homebrew bottles to homebrew kegging, i am strictly talking about commercial beer.
 
I agree. Beer on tap tastes better to me than bottles or cans. The first time I had Killian's Red was on tap and I liked it enough to look for it. I didn't enjoy it at all from the bottle. I've noticed this in a lot of other beers but don't know why this is the case.
 
On a marginally related note, a guy I used to sing with claimed that some beer varieties s are better in a glass, and others are better straight from the bottle. (kegs not involved)
 
Speculation: most kegged macro beer is not pasteurized while bottled and canned macro beers usually are.

Cheers!
wow that was a lot quicker than i expected . thanks

a simple google search would have prolly given me the answer. i had no idea kegs arent pasteurized or more correctly that they dont NEED to be pasteurized.

this really explains a lot
On a marginally related note, a guy I used to sing with claimed that some beer varieties s are better in a glass, and others are better straight from the bottle. (kegs not involved)
all beer varieties are better in a glass.

i think we had this discussion before.
 
wow that was a lot quicker than i expected . thanks

a simple google search would have prolly given me the answer. i had no idea kegs arent pasteurized or more correctly that they dont NEED to be pasteurized.

this really explains a lot

all beer varieties are better in a glass.

i think we had this discussion before.
Assuming the glasses are ‘beer clean’ and (aesthetically) are the proper type for the beer. Speaking of which, any ideas where I can find a proper set of Kolsch glasses (Stange)?
 
Then there's the brewery and/or the brewing process. I've always wondered what a Guinness from the motherland would taste like compared to the one I can get at my local beer store. I recently saw a video where a guy compared a can from Dublin to a can from his local beer store. No contest for him, he preferred the can from Dublin.

That's one example. A better for me is Founder All Day from the tap vs the can. I can only get that beer in cans in my area. It's my got to brew, so I'd love to sample some from a tap to compare.
 
Assuming the glasses are ‘beer clean’ and (aesthetically) are the proper type for the beer. Speaking of which, any ideas where I can find a proper set of Kolsch glasses (Stange)?


I have a few but can't remember where I got mine. Amazon has some, but I think I got mine form Dollar Tree, which were (obviously) much cheaper. If you have a Dollar Tree nearby, they are worth checking out to see what they have.
 
Let me set satisfy people's curiosity. I spent a couple of weeks in Ireland. Guinness and Murphy's tasted like they do here.

I can't mention his name, but a famous idiot once said he tried Guinness for the first time at the Shannon airport, and he realized it was better than it was in the States. Multiple press outlets have repeated this asinine story without asking how he knew it was better if he had never had it before.

Schneider Weisse tastes the same in Europe. Hoegaarden. Oranjeboom. Budweiser probably tastes bad everywhere.
 
Let me set satisfy people's curiosity. I spent a couple of weeks in Ireland. Guinness and Murphy's tasted like they do here.

I can't mention his name, but a famous idiot once said he tried Guinness for the first time at the Shannon airport, and he realized it was better than it was in the States. Multiple press outlets have repeated this asinine story without asking how he knew it was better if he had never had it before.

Schneider Weisse tastes the same in Europe. Hoegaarden. Oranjeboom. Budweiser probably tastes bad everywhere.
I would disagree in some cases

It all has a lot to do with freshness, especially with certain oxygen sensitive styles.

De Dolle Arabier for example tastes dramatically better when consumed directly at the brewery than from a bottle.

The freshness at the brewery just can't be matched. See example in picture
Screenshot_20241209_201612_Photos.jpg
 
I had a friend bring several cans of Guinness over from Ireland and I did a side-by-side with local North American cans of Guinness. There was a difference and I preferred the ones from Ireland. I don't believe that I checked for dates on the cans, and I should have thought of that. I can't say if the age of the cans were part of it.

In any case, it does seem that kegged beer tastes better to me than what I'd get from a can or bottle.
 
Then there's the brewery and/or the brewing process. I've always wondered what a Guinness from the motherland would taste like compared to the one I can get at my local beer store. I recently saw a video where a guy compared a can from Dublin to a can from his local beer store. No contest for him, he preferred the can from Dublin.

That's one example. A better for me is Founder All Day from the tap vs the can. I can only get that beer in cans in my area. It's my got to brew, so I'd love to sample some from a tap to compare.

Let me set satisfy people's curiosity. I spent a couple of weeks in Ireland. Guinness and Murphy's tasted like they do here.

I can't mention his name, but a famous idiot once said he tried Guinness for the first time at the Shannon airport, and he realized it was better than it was in the States. Multiple press outlets have repeated this asinine story without asking how he knew it was better if he had never had it before.

Schneider Weisse tastes the same in Europe. Hoegaarden. Oranjeboom. Budweiser probably tastes bad everywhere.
🤣
 
does it taste better in a $30 glass
It tastes better in the 8 oz. tulip glass the owner of my local taphouse gifted me. (Also, lattes taste better if there's "latte art" in the foam)

Without some effort to do blind tasting comparisons, these anecdotes are ... anecdotal. So many factors influence our perceptions, notably including the now-infamous confirmation bias.

But, enjoy that $30 glass and the beer in it. Why not?
 
Definately mass produced lagers i find much better on tap, than in a bottle.

Recently went to Hobart, Tasmania which has a long running ( longest in Aus i think ? ) brewery at the top of the hill. Beer in the local pubs was the best lager i think i've ever had. I'm assuming freshness. At the brewery itself, same, so good.
 
I've been bartendering in craft beer bar for a long time and had the opportunity to taste few dozen different beers side-by-side keg vs. bottle and theres allways been slight difference, even if the product has been from same lot.
By my thinking, the difference in taste keg vs. bottle/can comes from difference in freshness, storage and oxygen contact.
Kegs are allmost allways fresher than other packaging. Kegs usually go straight from brewery to bars and don't sit around on warehouse or store in suboptimal conditions as long.

Don't get me wrong, restaurants rarely have the capasity to store the kegs and bottles cold all the time, but the turnaround time in kegs is often much less than in other packaging.

Theres also minimal oxygen and light contact in packaging stage of the beer in kegs vs. bottles/cans.
 
Let me set satisfy people's curiosity. I spent a couple of weeks in Ireland. Guinness and Murphy's tasted like they do here.

I can't mention his name, but a famous idiot once said he tried Guinness for the first time at the Shannon airport, and he realized it was better than it was in the States. Multiple press outlets have repeated this asinine story without asking how he knew it was better if he had never had it before.

Schneider Weisse tastes the same in Europe. Hoegaarden. Oranjeboom. Budweiser probably tastes bad everywhere.
I disagree... I was just in Ireland two months ago, and the Guinness definitely seemed different. Smoother and creamier. Possible it was just in my head, but I drank them at the brewery and at several different pubs/restaurants, and it seemed to track.

I think it's possible that a portion of it is freshness. That should be less of an issue now that Guinness brews in the US, but then that also means that Guinness brewed in the US isn't Guinness brewed at the original brewery, so maybe there are other differences.

All that said, I'm not 100% sure it isn't in my head, because I don't drink a lot of Guinness here anyway... Maybe next time I'm out at a restaurant with it on tap I should try it again...

BTW the bartender in Killarney said they only keep Murphy's on tap during tourist season for Americans. 😂
 
kegged beer is typically not pasteurized.

That's why when you drink leftover keg beer from a frat party, after it got warm for a while, that it tastes funky.

Assuming there is leftover beer...
 
kegged beer is typically not pasteurized.

That's why when you drink leftover keg beer from a frat party, after it got warm for a while, that it tastes funky.

Assuming there is leftover beer...
IMHO it's not from getting warm. It's from the hand pump that's pushing a ton of oxygen into the keg. The beer gets oxidized, badly, and quickly.

Kegged homebrew is not pasteurized and is often (especially for those of us who brew 10 gallon batches so it yields two corny kegs per batch) stored warm. As long as it's stored under CO2 pressure it does just fine. And many of us have served at events where the beer is stored warm and served through a jockey box pushed by CO2, and it does just fine.

If just getting warm was an issue, it wouldn't be feasible to store homebrew kegs at room temp and/or to serve kegs that have gotten warm for 24+ hours through a jockey box.
 
IMHO it's not from getting warm. It's from the hand pump that's pushing a ton of oxygen into the keg. The beer gets oxidized, badly, and quickly.

Kegged homebrew is not pasteurized and is often (especially for those of us who brew 10 gallon batches so it yields two corny kegs per batch) stored warm. As long as it's stored under CO2 pressure it does just fine. And many of us have served at events where the beer is stored warm and served through a jockey box pushed by CO2, and it does just fine.

If just getting warm was an issue, it wouldn't be feasible to store homebrew kegs at room temp and/or to serve kegs that have gotten warm for 24+ hours through a jockey box.
excellent points
 
I disagree... I was just in Ireland two months ago, and the Guinness definitely seemed different. Smoother and creamier. Possible it was just in my head

It was just in your head.
BTW the bartender in Killarney said they only keep Murphy's on tap during tourist season for Americans. 😂
I didn't even think about what the locals drank, because why would I? The web says Murphy's is big where it's made but nowhere else.

I found Ireland to be extremely touristy everywhere, and they sell tourists garbage. Thin, disposable Aran Islands sweaters made by machines. T-shirts as sturdy as paper towels. Dublin was like Gatlinburg with worse food, no bears, and an increased likelihood of stepping in vomit. And most people we dealt with were immigrants from the continent and Africa. I guess the Irish all moved to Boston and Chicago.

Your bartender was probably playing you, by the way. I drank Murphy's in Killarney in March. I doubt they go to the trouble of changing kegs when Americans are perfectly happy with Guinness or even Bud.

Here's something surprising about Ireland: their fish and chips are usually disappointing. Long John Silver's buries them. I tried fish and chips in several cities, and I started to feel like Charlie Brown, running up to that football over and over. I didn't realize how good Long John's was until I went to Ireland. I thought fish and chips would be spectacular everywhere in the British Isles, but it turns out cities like Cincinnati and Tucson do it better than the Irish. The pub in Killarney did a decent job, but I would not eat there again.

The food in Ireland is generally bad, unless my wife and I just got unlucky a whole bunch of times in different cities, which is about as likely as it sounds. One place I really liked was Joe Watty's on Inis Mor, but the price you pay is having to visit a boring rock.

We found good Italian food here and there. We also had the British breakfast, which, for all I know, is also the Irish breakfast. Really useless. One miserable egg. Cold canned beans. A seasoned scab pretending to be sausage. No cream for the coffee. Americans are the kings of breakfast food.

I thought Ireland seemed like a nice place to live but not great to visit. The actual Irish people we met were wonderful, and the immigrants were also pleasant.
 
It was just in your head.

I didn't even think about what the locals drank, because why would I? The web says Murphy's is big where it's made but nowhere else.

I found Ireland to be extremely touristy everywhere, and they sell tourists garbage. Thin, disposable Aran Islands sweaters made by machines. T-shirts as sturdy as paper towels. Dublin was like Gatlinburg with worse food, no bears, and an increased likelihood of stepping in vomit. And most people we dealt with were immigrants from the continent and Africa. I guess the Irish all moved to Boston and Chicago.

Your bartender was probably playing you, by the way. I drank Murphy's in Killarney in March. I doubt they go to the trouble of changing kegs when Americans are perfectly happy with Guinness or even Bud.

Here's something surprising about Ireland: their fish and chips are usually disappointing. Long John Silver's buries them. I tried fish and chips in several cities, and I started to feel like Charlie Brown, running up to that football over and over. I didn't realize how good Long John's was until I went to Ireland. I thought fish and chips would be spectacular everywhere in the British Isles, but it turns out cities like Cincinnati and Tucson do it better than the Irish. The pub in Killarney did a decent job, but I would not eat there again.

The food in Ireland is generally bad, unless my wife and I just got unlucky a whole bunch of times in different cities, which is about as likely as it sounds. One place I really liked was Joe Watty's on Inis Mor, but the price you pay is having to visit a boring rock.

We found good Italian food here and there. We also had the British breakfast, which, for all I know, is also the Irish breakfast. Really useless. One miserable egg. Cold canned beans. A seasoned scab pretending to be sausage. No cream for the coffee. Americans are the kings of breakfast food.

I thought Ireland seemed like a nice place to live but not great to visit. The actual Irish people we met were wonderful, and the immigrants were also pleasant.
"Dublin was like Gatlinburg with worse food, no bears, and an increased likelihood of stepping in vomit."

That there was the best thing I've read all day!
 
I disagree... I was just in Ireland two months ago, and the Guinness definitely seemed different. Smoother and creamier. Possible it was just in my head, but I drank them at the brewery and at several different pubs/restaurants, and it seemed to track.

I think it's possible that a portion of it is freshness. That should be less of an issue now that Guinness brews in the US, but then that also means that Guinness brewed in the US isn't Guinness brewed at the original brewery, so maybe there are other differences.

All that said, I'm not 100% sure it isn't in my head, because I don't drink a lot of Guinness here anyway... Maybe next time I'm out at a restaurant with it on tap I should try it again...

BTW the bartender in Killarney said they only keep Murphy's on tap during tourist season for Americans. 😂


Took the words right out of my mouth. I've not had an Irish brewed Guinness and I'm willing to bet that is the sole reason why folks who claim a difference is what they are tasting.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top