bwarbiany said:
Some of us started brewing before the MrMalty calculator began being treated as divine revelation. A 1L-1.5L starter IS enough for pretty much any 5gal ale batch someone will do. If you get to that point, temp control on your fermentation will do more for your beer than moving to a starter larger than 1.5L.
I agree temp control will do more, but you're not even in complete disagreement with me. My opinion was that 1L flasks are too small... and they certainly are for 1.5L starters. If you're only going to have one flask, a 2L makes far more sense.
But I disagree with what your post is implying.
First of all, knowledge is knowledge, and tools are tools. Dismissing something that could improve your brews simply because you've been making beer longer than we've known something, or longer than a particular tool based on that knowledge has been available, doesn't mean they should be ignored. There's no reason a long-time brewer can't start propagating more yeast cells to provide a more ideal pitching rate, or buying a larger flask to do it with. If you're fine with the way you do things, that's cool, but giving people the impression that it can't be done better... not so much.
Secondly, I totally agree on the temp control. In fact, I'd go so far as to say temp control will do more for your beer than even making any starter at all (assuming fresh yeast.) Of course, the false dichotomy here should be beyond obvious. There's absolutely no reason it has to be either-or for most people, unless it's a newer brewer who can't afford both. But if somebody wants to invest in the stuff to make a starter, I would always recommend a 2L flask to start with instead of a 1L, and it sounds like you would too.