• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

reasons for low OG for first runnings

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

JLem

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
3,644
Reaction score
217
Location
Attleboro
I just tried my first no-sparge brew. It was a small batch, only intended for 3.5 gallons. It was also a pumpkin beer, so the grist contained some fresh pumpkin (grated using a cuisinart). I know that overall efficiency is low for no sparge brews, but mine was abysmal. The OG of the first runnings was a paltry 1.040.

Here's my grist:
5 lbs Pale Malt, Maris Otter (3.0 SRM) Grain
2 lbs Pumpkin, fresh (3.0 SRM) Grain
1 lbs Caramunich I (Weyermann) (43.0 SRM) Grain
8.0 oz Melanoidin (Weyermann) (33.0 SRM) Grain
8.0 oz Vienna Malt (3.5 SRM) Grain
8.0 oz Wheat Malt, Pale (Weyermann) (1.4 SRM) Grain

I used 16 quarts of water and my mash temp ended up on the lowish side (148-149), but after 60 minutes I had full conversion (iodine test). Shouldn't this amount of grain yield a higher first runnings OG? I used Kai's chart here (http://www.braukaiser.com/wiki/index.php/Understanding_Efficiency#Conversion_efficiency) and figured on a much higher OG. In the end my efficiency was only about 34%. I had expected something in the 50-60% range.

Given that I got full conversion and that the OG of first wort runnings is independent of volume (though I realize that volume matters when calculating brewhouse efficiency), I am assuming that my crush was not particularly good (in fact, terrible). Does this seem reasonable? Am I missing something else?
 
i assume you do allot of AG brewing. if so i would agree that the crush being the culprit sounds reasonable. the finer the crush the easier it is to get to the sugars. if you don't do allot of AG i would look into the efficiency of the mash tun. is it draining from all parts of the grain bed evenly? is there a big dead spot in your mash tun? are you draining to fast and compacting the grain?
 
What was your expected og? How much wort did you collect? Is this based off a recipe that you've done in the past? If so what was that recipe. I've read that with no-sparge you have to bump your recipe up by at least half...

I've been considering trying some no-sparge too and will keep an eye on this thread.
 
I actually get pretty decent efficiency when no-sparging, 75-80% (which is about 10 points less than my 'normal' efficiency). Efficiency suffers a lot more for higher gravity (>1.060) beers.

Could you tell us more about your process?
 
I'm not really complaining about overall efficiency, which I get is a function of the lautering process. What struck me as odd is that the first runnings were only 1.040. Regardless of how much wort I manage to collect (which will go into calculating my overall efficiency), I expected this number to be much higher.

I mashed 7.5 pounds of grain plus 2 pounds of fresh, grated pumpkin in 4 gallons of water.

To answer some of your questions:
This was my first AG attempt. Since it was no-sparge, I assumed I would only get 50-60% efficiency and adjusted the recipe accordingly. In the end, I only got 34% overall efficiency. I collected the volume I calculated I would (2.5 gallons), but the gravity of the first runnings was nowhere near where I was thinking it would/should be. This was my first attempt at meshing AG with my limited stove-top boil volume. I have the math all worked out and it should/can work as long as my assumption about the first wort runnings is accurate, which is where I seem to have failed this time.

Given this grist and this mash volume, what would you expect the first runnings to come out as?
 
Back
Top