• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Pulling Grain From Mash For Decoction

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
ive

I've done the same, slightly different temps but same process. 122,148 and 160 ...

lol, being that i add gluco to all my beers, and the protein rest is pretty lose range...that's what i do too....gives me about a 5-6% bump up in efficiency with the separate alpha rest, not sure if it's the enzymes or maybe more starch gel'ing

edit: they say a mash out temp of 167f, but maybe 162 would be better, alpha is still active.....and maybe it gels more starch for conversion.....
 
lol, being that i add gluco to all my beers, and the protein rest is pretty lose range...that's what i do too....gives me about a 5-6% bump up in efficiency with the separate alpha rest, not sure if it's the enzymes or maybe more starch gel'ing

edit: they say a mash out temp of 167f, but maybe 162 would be better, alpha is still active.....and maybe it gels more starch for conversion.....
i dont do the suggested mashout temps usually . i do my mash and rests then hit my pre-boil volume during the sparge process. Ive been consistently hitting correct numbers .
 
i dont do the suggested mashout temps usually . i do my mash and rests then hit my pre-boil volume during the sparge process. Ive been consistently hitting correct numbers .

i'd be curious since you do the separate alpha rest like me if you noticed a bump in efficiency with it also?
 
Where di you guys get your 32oz dipper from? Places I've looked at online charge insane shipping rates.
+1 on this. NB doesn't sell them any longer and online reviews have me skeptical about buying from amazon vendors that show them available..
 
Sorry, I went to send you guys the link to the one I bought on Amazon, but it is currently not available........


John
 
i'd be curious since you do the separate alpha rest like me if you noticed a bump in efficiency with it also?
honestly , i dont even check that . i use a brewing calculator of sorts through the HBS website I used to get my stuff back in Illinois, Chicago Brew Werks . Its usually set at 75%. I do my rests at temps for times avg from Daniels book for the style Im making at the moment. I figure as long as my numbers are close, im good. So far, my numbers havent been just close ,but spot on. I mean, I suppose if I ran my numbers to check efficiency I could( and should now that youve asked) .I havent had one yet that I was one bit dissatisfied with in the glass. In fact, I cant say my beers are improving because I dont make the same beer more than once except for my wifes Bavarian Hef I keep handy. Last one I made was an exact repeat of the second (which was my own recipe)but third hef for her. According to her my beer making skills have greatly improved with every beer I make. Shes the only beer judge I need besides myself. Right now I'm finishing up a Weyermann Barke Pilsner based homemade recipe lager with 2 ounces of Hallertauer , probably bottle today . I reached target FG yesterday after a little tech/temp issue I had, all good now. Tastes /looks wonderful and as planned.
 
i'd be curious since you do the separate alpha rest like me if you noticed a bump in efficiency with it also?
I guess when I think about it , i used to do a single infusion...since I started the step mashes with that extra rest i do notice a little more depth in my beer . so , without going through the formula and checking numbers I would guess so.
 
I guess when I think about it , i used to do a single infusion...since I started the step mashes with that extra rest i do notice a little more depth in my beer . so , without going through the formula and checking numbers I would guess so.

thanks for the response, i'm trying to figure out if i'm crazy or not....i add gluco to all my beers so i just mash at anything between 145-155, then bump it up to 162 for a good alpha rest...pushes my efficiency as seen from BS2, from 83% to 88-89...saves me a buck or so on a 10 gallon batch
 
I'd prefer something with a longer handle with all that hot mash etc.

I saw Gordon Strong demonstrate decoction using an old kitchen pan with a long handle. Not exact measurements but close enough to get the job done.

And, yes, I thought about that just after I hit "post reply."
 
thanks for the response, i'm trying to figure out if i'm crazy or not....i add gluco to all my beers so i just mash at anything between 145-155, then bump it up to 162 for a good alpha rest...pushes my efficiency as seen from BS2, from 83% to 88-89...saves me a buck or so on a 10 gallon batch
i dont add much of anything except malts and hops . A couple times I added sugars to drive up the abv but only 1 pound in a 6 gallon batch. i try to keep my rests at a tighter tolerance . 148-154 is my range, style dependent. Like i said , I really just brew on avg, 13 lbs of malts per 5 gallon batch add another pound for 6 gallons. sometimes I just play with the numbers on that brew builder I use to get to rough style then push the amounts around to tweak it in ,maybe push the abv or BU:GU . I dont get too bent on efficiency numbers.
 
I dont get too bent on efficiency numbers.

lol, i'm brewing on the cheap, so i do ;) (and yes i do it for fun, even a $2.50 twelver is affordable, but 99 cents is better :D)

back to your originally scheduled programing....
 
Back
Top