• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Pittsburgh

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Don't forget about the Otterbois that'll trash the vanilla one for being a pastrywine.
I expect the vanilla version to be the lesser of the two but it probably won't be a vanilla bomb like caution has been in the past. I probably won't get to try it anyway so my opinion means squat.
 
Got a nice care package from Pittsburgh today. Figured I'd crack a few for my bday. IPA game down here is comparable to Pittsburgh so don't miss that really, and the wild ale scene is probably actually better, excluding Strange Log, but man does this stuff remind me that the big BA beer/stout game is weak as hell down here. I guess it makes sense given the climate though. Anyways, had Really Thin Pancakes, which is waaaaay better than Mornin Delight, in case dadavat was wondering, and BG IV which somehow trumped III. Both top level beers and a showcase of what they're both capable of.
 
I just told someone you had 1364 unique checkins and got a dry-slow tugger. Also paid cash.
Anytime anyone says "craft beer" is dominated by dudes, I'm gonna remind them that no matter their race, sexual preference or whatever that if they tick enough beers they'll be respected enough to get a "dry slow tugger"
 
So which of you miscreants are gonna go and stand in line on Saturday morning for BRC pourz?
giphy.gif
 
the big BA beer/stout game is weak as hell down here. I guess it makes sense given the climate though.

I concur and the constant ******* heat was my logical conclusion as well.
BG IV which somehow trumped III.

Was BG IV an Old Ale? How does it compare to II, which I loved and probably drank more of than any BG other than MOMO.
 
I concur and the constant ******* heat was my logical conclusion as well.


Was BG IV an Old Ale? How does it compare to II, which I loved and probably drank more of than any BG other than MOMO.

IV is a BA Wee Heavy.


And you'll get to try it soon enough, you old so and so.
 
I'm gonna come in with the unpopular opinion that iv was decent but nothing special and not worth the cost. I'd put it in the realm of backwoods and wulver, both of which are cheaper and easily accessible. I guess pgh is blessed with one style of great shelfie action with ba scotch ale/wee heavy. Should be easy to do a side by side.
 
I'm gonna come in with the unpopular opinion that iv was decent but nothing special and not worth the cost. I'd put it in the realm of backwoods and wulver, both of which are cheaper and easily accessible. I guess pgh is blessed with one style of great shelfie action with ba scotch ale/wee heavy. Should be easy to do a side by side.

While I thought BG IV was more complex than those two, for me the biggest difference was drinkability. I love Backwoods and Wulver, but they're both pretty hot booze wise , especially Wulver. IV seemed a lot more well rounded to me. I likened it to Alesmith BA Wee Heavy rather than backwoods or Wulver.
 
While I thought BG IV was more complex than those two, for me the biggest difference was drinkability. I love Backwoods and Wulver, but they're both pretty hot booze wise , especially Wulver. IV seemed a lot more well rounded to me. I likened it to Alesmith BA Wee Heavy rather than backwoods or Wulver.
I also thought the Alesmith BA Wee Heavy was the closest comparison to IV.
 
I haven't opened any of mine yet. I'll drink one this weekend and grace you all with my expert opinion later.
 
I'm gonna come in with the unpopular opinion that iv was decent but nothing special and not worth the cost. I'd put it in the realm of backwoods and wulver
Funny, I was also going to put IV in the realm of backwoods and wulver, which means I thought it was ******* phenomenal. Backwoods is still my favorite Founders beer (with the possible exception of black biscuit, which I remember loving, but is forever lost to my aging, beer-drowned memory), and I think I slightly preferred wulver to backwoods. If anyone got bottles of IV and wants to, we should definitely try a side-by-side-by-side.
 
I haven’t had IV, but I’d be hard pressed to think it’s better than either old TWs. Opposite for the new batch. Fire away, VM.

Every time I read something positive about the OG tenacious wee bottles it makes me think that I got pranked.

Ive drank a couple beers in my life...and to this day both of them were the only beers I ever come across that smelled like catfish stink bait.
 
but the question we're all dying to have answered - how does it compare to Tenacious Wee?
I haven’t had IV, but I’d be hard pressed to think it’s better than either old TWs. Opposite for the new batch. Fire away, VM.
I loved the newer TW, but it's so barrel-heavy, it's completely unlike any of the other previously discussed wees. Tasted more like a ba old ale to me.
 
Every time I read something positive about the OG tenacious wee bottles it makes me think that I got pranked.

Ive drank a couple beers in my life...and to this day both of them were the only beers I ever come across that smelled like catfish stink bait.
Dang, I think that’s the first I’ve ever heard of bad ones in the old batches. My condolences. Eagle Rare was one of my favorite BRC beers ever.
 
Every time I read something positive about the OG tenacious wee bottles it makes me think that I got pranked.

Ive drank a couple beers in my life...and to this day both of them were the only beers I ever come across that smelled like catfish stink bait.

Dang, I think that’s the first I’ve ever heard of bad ones in the old batches. My condolences. Eagle Rare was one of my favorite BRC beers ever.

I had 1 bad OG Ten Wee (similar to stakem's notes) vs 2 fantastic nearly perfect OG bottles. The bad one was maybe at a year and a half old? The good ones were hot off the presses.

I had to check to see if I even had the new one... so that says something right there. Despite this, I apparently liked it better than the OG Buffalo Trace but not quite as much as the OG Eagle Rare.

I like talking about old Pittsburgh beers. :)
 
Funny, I was also going to put IV in the realm of backwoods and wulver, which means I thought it was ******* phenomenal. Backwoods is still my favorite Founders beer (with the possible exception of black biscuit, which I remember loving, but is forever lost to my aging, beer-drowned memory), and I think I slightly preferred wulver to backwoods. If anyone got bottles of IV and wants to, we should definitely try a side-by-side-by-side.
I didn't by any means think it was bad, but just not enough better than shelfies i can pick up at any giant eagle at half the cost or less. I guess its more of a testament to the fact that we have awesome shelf beers of at least one style.

To add my two cents, i liked the new TW but my bottle had some of that green apple-y barrel flavor. It wasn't off-putting and i enjoyed the whole bottle.

I think BA scotch ales/wee heavies age weird. They can get a cola-like flavor. Anyone else ever notice that?
 
I had 1 bad OG Ten Wee (similar to stakem's notes) vs 2 fantastic nearly perfect OG bottles. The bad one was maybe at a year and a half old? The good ones were hot off the presses.

I had to check to see if I even had the new one... so that says something right there. Despite this, I apparently liked it better than the OG Buffalo Trace but not quite as much as the OG Eagle Rare.

I like talking about old Pittsburgh beers. :)

Tool City
 
Every time I read something positive about the OG tenacious wee bottles it makes me think that I got pranked.

Ive drank a couple beers in my life...and to this day both of them were the only beers I ever come across that smelled like catfish stink bait.
OG Weyerbacher Blithering Idiot had that same stank
 
Back
Top