• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Phase 2 brewery build progress shots

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Big difference between the saturated steam systems you are familiar with and the flash boiler system that has water evaporation in the lower level and additional vapor heating in the upper reaches without need for pressure. The flash boiler will operate at about 1 psi (opening pressure of outlet check valve) and SS coil boiler has been up to 500 degrees at the outlet. Most of the steam systems I have worked around range from smaller 15 -150 psi saturated packaged steam boilers and larger superheated steam systems running from 300 - 2,000 psi for power generation. Steam temperature does not have to follow pressure like saturated systems, with superheating you can maintain low pressure but heat the vapor to high temperatures without significant pressure change. The largest challenge is the small volume of liquid means temperature changes are quick, 50 - 165 degrees at .5 Gpm on old boiler in about 45-50 seconds, steam in about 60 seconds, should be able to beat that with copper boiler.
 
How do you prevent moisture from a violent boil being carried up those tubes. I know in our steam systems there were moisture separators in the steam generator that kept most liquid out of the steam system... and that has been my biggest curiosity with the flash boiler process. When you get a leg of water up a coil? Am I right in the assumption that there is water at saturation pressure at the bottom of the inlet tube/coils?.. or are you running steam in to it?
 
You feed water to the bottom and it heats as it rises, boiling level depends on flow and burner firing level. with the diameter to length ratio there is usually enough surface to finish boiling any water that escapes boiling zone. Unlike the boilers with water seperators in the top of the drum that coalesce water drops and send them back to the drum, the tubing curves and length take care of that function. Water has to be fed from the bottom because the dissolved air fotms bubbles whic can block flow in a top down feed situation. This was discovered when I built the first flash boiler 7 years ago for R&D steam brewing system, it popped and snapped as water flashed in the tubing instead of boiling smoothly. Changing the flow to bottom up eliminated the problem as the air bubbles traveled with the water, instead of blocking flow.
 
I've only been on this board less than a year and I'd have to say, your rig is by far the most overkill (in a good way:D) and elaborate design I have EVER seen and will ever see in my lifetime. Sometimes I look at my rig and think......"man did I ever need to get this crazy just to make beer?".

Then I see yours and think HOLY SH*T! :D

Great job:mug:
 
I have been toying with the idea of improving the first rig design and making something that can be broken down into component assemblies and stored easily. With current system automation and process control as test system I believe a reduced capability version could be built for traditional single infusion mash and step mashing control. Not everyone has the space for a dedicated brewing rig, and a system that could be broken down and stored in a closet or cabinet might have some use. The old system would fit in the trunk and back seat of a car for transport, and took about 15 minutes to assemble/disassemble.
 
Pressure tested the boiler to 100 PSI with Argon, no bubbles or pressure loss so it should be good to go now. Shipping it back to house tonight so it will be there next week when i take next R&R trip home, and hope to find time to test it before heading back to Arizona again.
 
Made the boiler coil swap and have fired it up for a output test, it hit 50 degrees in and 165 degrees out at .5 gpm with 35K btu's input for about 82% efficiency. Found that the massflow controller needs recalibration to get full flow on propane, it was setup for N2 and only delivers 7.2 LPM / 36% full output on propane. The new boiler definately has more coil area than needed as the gas temperature leaving the boiler was 190 degrees.
 
After some tuning on the mass flow controller I am able to push the strike flow heating up to 168 degrees at .75 gpm, steam at .5 GPM with the new boiler. Next up is finish PID loop tuning for strike water heating then sparge water heating and steam. After loop tuning is done it will be time for auto control run tomorrow to check out malt transport and mashing equipment. Had a suprise when paper liner attached to aluminum heat sheild ignited during boiler test, it seems the radiant heat from the boiler chimney in the burner area was too much for the paper.
 
After some tuning on the mass flow controller I am able to push the strike flow heating up to 168 degrees at .75 gpm, steam at .5 GPM with the new boiler. Next up is finish PID loop tuning for strike water heating then sparge water heating and steam. After loop tuning is done it will be time for auto control run tomorrow to check out malt transport and mashing equipment. Had a suprise when paper liner attached to aluminum heat sheild ignited during boiler test, it seems the radiant heat from the boiler chimney in the burner area was too much for the paper.

That's where I am at with my boiler.I can heat cold 50* water on the fly to 170ish at .75 GPM. At the .5 GPM I get steam on the output. At least at the boiler I do.

I hope all goes well for you on the test run. I am waiting for your post about brewing on the system. You have an intense amount of time invested in your new setup. Not that I have to tell you.:)

Have a good night Klaude.:mug:
 
I have spent a bit of time putting together the main system graphic screen and placing the control and measurement devices with values on there. The conversion to JPG leaves a lot to be desired but it is sorta legible. http://picasaweb.google.com/kevin.ladue/ScreenShots#5485797437871344834 Not much left to tweak in the software at this point, all the hardware and software is functional, just need some tuning time on the system now as PID loop tuning last thing left to do. Next up is moving the code to the Java ME platform in preperation for use on an ARM 9 platform, and the memory challenged panel PC.
 
After building and testing the copper boiler I found that the 100' copper boiler was too large for the burner capacity and would heat water fine but sucked at steam generation. It appears that the hot gasses cooled enough that the steam was cooling in the upper level of the boiler and driving the burner to reach superheat steam temperatures melted the silver solder in the bottom connection. The original 80' SS tube boiler was re-installed and it seems to be working well enough now that the mass flow gas controller was tweaked to increase flow. The last test run for water heating was holding 168 degrees at .75 GPM, up from the .5 GPM from previous testing. The plumbing and software have been revised to eliminate the water measure and storage tank, and add a solenoid valve for .3GPH water flow during steam generation. The proportional valves just could not hit the same point each time at that low of a flow so a solenoid valve and a Dwyer flow meter with flow adjustment was piped in a bypass of the primary electronic flow meter and proportional valve to hit the low flow needed. The graphics have been modified to reflect the ongoing design work and additions to the hardware and software to eliminate the dial gauges and incorporate a malt measuring and feed system copied from dry measure packaging systems. Code and graphics are finished and simulation runs of the feed system are working, so next step is to build and wire the full scale version.
Here are some of the updated graphics http://picasaweb.google.com/kevin.ladue/AutomaticMaltSystem#
 
So what do you envision the capability of this system to be? Press a button for any recipe and it brews the whole thing without any other input? Or do you still have to load the ingredients before you run it?
 
At this point you still have to load the hops by hand and connect the fermenter, but after creating your recipe or retrieving a saved recipe all you do is hit autorun icon, the software and hardware does the rest. For the most part this is a make work exercise to take up time while working away from home. This is an evolution of the first steam RIMS system I built in 2003 http://picasaweb.google.com/kevin.ladue/OldBrewingSystem#, this unit is the all manual version that I used for design of the automated system, as far as I know it is the only other steam RIMS unit around.
 
incorporate a malt measuring and feed system copied from dry measure packaging systems.
What system did you select?
I went to a volumetric dispensing system for the time being.
All motors, sensors for the rotary valves I had in stock and load cells I don't have.
My main control panel and program is done, the silos need the cones and other hardware.
The grain transportation system from and to the grain mill is still missing.
Great to read about your progress.

Cheers,
ClaudiusB
 
Kladue,
this is impressive!!!
Would you mind sharing some details about the boil kettle burner?
 
The boil kettle burner is made from 1" Od tubing cut 6" long and then mitered and tig welded to a 1" center tube. The gas jet is 1/16" and arm openings are 3/32" holes were drilled 1/4" C-C 45 degrees from top. A 1/4" X 1-1/2" fender washer was used to spread fire 360 degrees for fast ignition of all 6 arms from one pilot burner, openings under washer provide gas air mix. After experimenting on a couple other burners like this the optimum hole size and spacing were developed for clean burn with high pressure propane feed. The general layout can be scaled for larger kettles by up sizing pipe arms but the arm openings should stay 1/8" or smaller to allow flame to be turned down without flash back.
 
Thanks Kevin,
I like how your burner nicely spreads the heat. I often wonder about the intensity of some of the small diameter burners. Once I had to replace the bottom in one of my kettles after the sheet had work hardened (think that's the right name for the phenomenon?) Tried to weld the hair cracks, but while welding one I could see about 10 more developing!!! I ended up welding the bottom of a keg onto what was left of the original bottom.

I don't completely understand the fender washer fire spreader bit. Is that the one on top of the centre tube? You raise that washer a bit above the centre pipe to get a little gas flowing towards the 6 arms to get the flame to spread to all of them?
Is it a bolt and nut system w the nut welded onto the top of the centre pipe and to raise it you screw out the bolt a bit?
I also wondered if to make the welding of the arms to the centre pipe a bit easier it would be an option to give at least the upper portion of that pipe a larger diameter? It would give more room / manoeuvrability to weld the beads there. I guess in that case the flame spreader would have to be made accordingly larger?
Although it looks like you are getting a very clean burn, would trying to make to create a vortex in the centre pipe be beneficial?

It's nice to be able to ask such questions!

BTW: for many years I have been using various kinds of burners and controls from water heaters and furnaces. I think over in Europe more people are doing it and if I am right Boerderij Kabouter may actually have an article about that on his website.
I haven't come across anybody who's doing that here.
It's nice to have the pilot and safety features that come with that. I myself wouldn't trust a ring or other burner that doesn't have either of the above.
For my BK for example I use the whole unit from a water heater, including the built-in probe and thermostat. I simply welded a 3/4" nipple onto the keggle at the right height in the side to get the burner at the right distance from the bottom, screwed a 3/4" connector onto it and screwed the probe in the connector. The thermostat needed tweaking for higher temps, but that was easy enough.

I hope I am not sidetracking here, I wondered about starting a specific thread...
 
Here is a shot from the top of the burner while burning http://picasaweb.google.com/kevin.ladue/PilotLights#5157308850096904738, the fender washer is held on with 1/4-20 bolt in tapped opening in center. The gas feeds are holes drilled where tubing meets at welds, and when the pilot flame lights the first 2 arms the flame at the center lights the rest of the arms instantly. The other burners I have built use 3" tube in the center, drilled for 1" tube and sealed top and bottom with a solid plate, here is a poor shot of the other burnerhttp://picasaweb.google.com/kevin.ladue/OldBrewingSystem#5259648266760639282. The gas jet openings for the burners are 1/16" and usually the operating pressure is about 5-10 PSI for maximum flame.
 
Thanks a bunch Kevin,
great work.
Second burner: that's the kind of design I was referring to indeed. With this one, one could weld the 1 inchers from the inside of the 3 inch pipe before welding on the bottom plate to close it off.
Any thoughts about reusing burners from water heaters as I mentioned before?
 
While the water heater burner systems are attractive, the BTU output is usually around 30K BTU's maximum Vs 100K+ for most of the high pressure burners. The largest obstacle to heating a keggle type kettle is the skirt traps the hot gasses and prevents the flow across the surface for heat transfer. The vented skirt design on the new system keeps the combustion products moving and the vent pipe takes the combustion products out through the roof so you do not have to have a large vent hood and fan, just a small unit to catch water vapor.
 
Finally have had some time to resume testing after modifying the boiler water circuit to include a low flow rate meter. After running some tests at 1 GPM recirculation rate I pushed the boiler steam production up to the point it reached 60 degrees temperature rise through the mixer tee with a 3.5 GPH water flow input. Now that the boiler control is working like it should, I should be able to finish tuning and start the mash step heating testing and tuning, and then go for an auto sequence run this trip. Rewrite of the application in C# is under way and should be ready for testing in a couple months, the goal is to shrink the application down to a point it will run on an ARM powered touch screen platform.
 
Tested the .Net re-write and brought the hardware communication up this weekend, a couple tweaks and it is working now with the 5 Opto 22 PLC interface boards. A little bit more to do on a couple pop up dialog helpers and the conversion will be complete, then some house keeping and background image work and it will be finished. The touch screen PC has limited memory and a slow clock speed so I am not sure if a web interface would be wise on that platform.
Next up is the purchase of an ARM 9 platform with 5"X7" touch screen display to play with, and a couple I2C analog, digital, and PWM boards to see what can be done on a smaller scale system. I have time to burn nights and weekends so this will keep me occupied for a bit seeing what I can make it do, and then work with a friend to test this on an electric brew system.
 
ok i have been trying to understand your software here. i understand how to write jave applications, C applications, and am pretty handy at SLC 500 plcs. But I am getting lost on where you are going from an embedded application to the opto 22 plcs.

maybe i scanned over the post that explained it but all. However I was able to catch you mention "opto 22 interface boards" and am curious about these.

I just coughed up a lot of cash for a rslogix license and although I can make my touch panel work with the plc and the plc operate devices easily; i can much easier write the logic, gui, and complex parts in java. I am wondering if i could be going the wrong direction with AB and rslogix.
 
Back
Top