• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Perceived Flavor threshold: sodium metabisulfite (SMB) and potassium metabisulfite (Campden)

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The methods you came up with in your basements have absolutely nothing to do with the methods the industry uses and that Kunze describes. Neither in Narziss nor in Kunze will you ever find mention of "trifectas" or "mash caps" or "underletting" and so on. The methods you guys use have zero proof as regards their effectiveness and you quoting what the industry does (which, again, is completely different) to mitigate HSA as proof of it is intellectually dishonest at best.

Those are pretty strong words, what say we go take a peek into Kunze and see what he has to say about all this.

Why don’t we start with the trifecta. Sure I’ll give you that oxygen scavengers for the mash aren’t mentioned in Kunze (by the way we never said they were) because macros have no need of them due to their scale. If I had a 500 hectoliter tun I wouldn’t worry about oxygen uptake during the mash either. The square-cube law says as you increase the size of the container you also decrease its surface area to volume ratio. As home brewers our small volume wide mouth kettles have the highest surface area to volume comparatively so if one wants to brew equivalent beers to the macros we need some kind of help in reducing contact with air in the hot side or removing what O2 manages to get in. Metabisulfite and ascorbic acid are well known to mop up dissolved oxygen and are used sometimes in the packaging process so it seemed reasonable to employ these same tools in the mash.

Many commercial tuns have enclosed tops with sealing access doors whereas we homebrewers generally have open top kettles with a lot of open area. Therefore a mashcap is a simple but effective way to reduce the surface area of the wort and a logical low cost approximation of what the commercial brewers do with their expensive equipment. Certainly you won’t find any mention of mashcaps in the professional literature but it solves a problem only the small scale brewer has. Does that invalidate our process because a mashcap is just a hack to simulate a more sealed system? Is this, as you say, an intellectually dishonest, interpretation and execution of the oxidation problems outlined in Kunze? I guess each reader here will have to make their own judgment on that. In that same vein, you won’t find anything about RIMS, HERMS or even the venerable cooler mashtun in these books since these things are also clever homebrew hacks that the small brewers have come up with to approximate the processes of the big guys.

Lets move on to the issue of HSA. Maybe you and I have a different edition of Technology Brewing and Malting because in my copy, Kunze is very specific about avoiding oxygen on the hotside. For instance in chapter 3, Wort Production, where he first makes mention to avoid staling by beginning in the mashing process, “It is therefore desirable to stop the effect of oxidation from the start." Or how about section 4.6.4.2 Factors Encouraging Flavor Stability, where the author makes quite a list, of which I have listed below the ones most pertinent to this discussion.

During mashing
- Particularly avoid addition of oxygen during mashing in.
- Low oxygen mashing in and mashing with a high mashing in temperature.
- Gentle transportation of mash, avoiding shear forces.
- Keep oxygen away while mashing, if necessary pump in nitrogen.
- Mashing from underneath, low oxygen working method. (wait, what’s this he is saying?)
- No narrow elbows in the piping, no entrance of air.
- Mash storage into the lautering vessel from below. (kind of sounds like underletting, no?)

And he goes on in the next part about avoiding oxygen in the boil by first moving the wort into the boil by input from below. Seems Kunze is pretty clear about oxidation, its effects on flavor stability and how to avoid it on the hot side.
But yea you are right, darn it, there is no mention of the word ‘underletting’.

Going back to the above list in section 4.6.4.2, one of the items says, “Keep oxygen away while mashing, if necessary pump in nitrogen” I don’t know about you, but that sounds like he is describing exactly what some of us low oxygen guys are already doing to solve this problem, purging our sealed systems with nitrogen. This is the next evolution and in my opinion brings us really very close to duplicating, on our scale, what the German macros do.

In neither of those texts will you also find mention of this "wonderful, never tasted before, divine malt taste that you can only get if you come over to our side" because that is simply pure bullcrap. The effects of HSA are well known and documented and aren't what you claim they are.

This is simply your opinion based on your own experience but isn’t supported by any of the science of brewing (with the obvious exception of Brulosophy) or the texts we just reviewed. By your own admission you haven’t tried the low oxygen methods and therefore are not in a position to give any evidence from direct observation of same. If you care to look at some of these papers you would find a lot of contradictory evidence against your bold assertions about HSA and the low oxygen methods.

M. Ditrych, W. Filipowska, G. De Rouck, B. Jaskula-Goiris, G. Aerts, M. L. Andersen and L. De Cooman – Investigating the evolution of free staling aldehydes throughout the wort production process
M. Kanauchi and C.W. Bamforth – A Challenge in the Study of Flavour Instability
Vanderhaegen, Neven, Verachtert and Derdelinckx – The Chemistry of Beer Aging: A Critical Review
Bamforth and Parsons – New Procedures to Improve the Flavor Stability of Beer
Jurkova, Horak, Haskova, Culik, Cejka and Kellner – Control of Antioxidant Beer Activity by the Mashing Process
Zufall and Tyrell – The Influence of Heavy Metal Ions on Beer Flavor Stability
Narziss – Technological Factors of Flavor Stability
Stephenson, Biawa, Miracle and Bamforth – Laboratory-Scale Studies of the Impact of Oxygen on Mashing
O’Rourke – The Role of Oxygen in Brewing
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry – Oxidative degradation of lipids during mashing
Norja Lasko – Lipolytic and Oxidative Changes of Barley lipids During Malting and Mashing
B. Jaskula-Goiris, B. De Causmaecker, G. De Rouck, L. De Cooman and G. Aerts – Detailed Multivariate Modeling of Beer Staling in Commercial Pale Lagers
L. De Cooman and G. Aerts – The impact of wort production on the flavor quality and stability of pale lager beer
J. Savel – Negative role of oxidized polyphenols and reductones in beer


I also take issue with your gross over-exagerating of everything. See for example the issue with residual O2 in food grade CO2 which should require us to buy lab grade CO2 at exhorbitant prices when not even the industry dreams of doing that except where it is really needed.

Again the preponderance of evidence as against your position on this and we went all through this in the thread about CO2. Your statement about the cost of high purity CO2 isn’t accurate either. I just purchased 50lbs of carbon dioxide for $110 and you can see for yourself the purity in the COA I have attached below.

There.. I hope that I have made my position clear and backed it with good evidence and maybe we can get past this issue that seems so stuck in your craw.

COA Oxarc.JPG
 
Last edited:
BTW I've checked the German edition of Kunze and it says "up to 20 g/hl" so it appears nothing was lost or changed in translation.
I was looking at this again.

I believe he's simply stating the legal maximum for sulfite usage in the EU (200ppm in wine).
He then incorrectly states the maximum is 10ppm, which is in fact the maximum allowable without appropriate labeling (e.g. "contains sulfites").

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2014:021:0009:0011:EN:PDF
 
The current EU limit for beer is actually 20 mg/l or 50 mg/l if it has a "seond fermentation in the cask".
You need to scroll to page 22 of this document to find it:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31995L0002&from=EN

Labeling regulations of course still apply even below the legal limit (above the legal limit jailtime applies ;)).

In general Kunze as well as Narziß will refrain from quoting legal limits as they tend to vary wildly across the world. When they do they will usually contextualize them (such as "only in Germany" or "if in compliance with the Reinheitsgebot").

It's also possible that when he wrote "10ppm" that was the limit at the time for Germany. The book has undergone many revisions and it's impossible to determine when that particular sentence was written.
 
Well then since many lager beers, produce yeast derived sulfites from fermentation (up to 50mg/l +), that must mean those breweries are infact illegal.
 
It doesn't matter how much is produced during fermentation but only what is in the packaged product.
Barring a major fermentation catastrophe levels in packaged beer will always be lower as it mostly conditions out, unless you have a refermentation in the cask (presumably this includes bottle refermentation as well) for which the legislation does in fact allow up to 50 mg/l.
 
I guess I'll take the "up to 20g/hL" wording at face value then.

At pH 4.0, 200ppm free SO2 would produce almost 1.3ppm molecular SO2, pushing into the realm where it would be noticable.

I'm just surprised he would suggest such a high amount.
 
I think it's more of an acknowledgement of a fact rather than an actual suggestion. Something like, "Up to 20 g/hl have been used in the industry. I'm neither endorsing nor condemning it, just acknowledging the reality".
 
Beyond the theory, how many people have actually tried adding metabisulphite at packaging?

Seduced by the idea of an extra buffer against oxidation I've experimented with adding small amounts of sodium metabisulphite to a keg when racking from my fermenter. I did this with 3 beers, and I've added 0.3 or 0.2g to 17.5 litres of beer - which should be well within the undetectable levels suggested in this thread.

In all 3 beers I can smell sulphur, and it follows through to the taste too at a low level. It also takes a long time to go away.

Most recently I added 0.2g sodium metabisulphite (powder, not campden tablets) to 17.5 litres of a Cream Ale in a corny. Out of the fermenter there was no trace of sulphur, but when I tried it two days later it was there. After a few more days I took it out of my kegerator to make room for something else while hopefully the sulphur ages out, but after 16 days sat at around 19c (66f) it's still there.

I rebrewed exactly the same Cream Ale recipe as soon as I realised I'd tainted the previous batch. It went into a keg a few days ago without sodium metabisulphite, and this time there's no sulphur at all.


Reading the comments of the Brulosophy article it seems some people find the same as me, whereas others don't. I've no idea why.
 
Beyond the theory,
[...]
In all 3 beers I can smell sulphur,
[...]
I've no idea why.
Knowing the "theory" certainly helps! It's the key to understanding what's happening with your beers.

In a nutshell: Active yeast convert the SO2 to H2S. Brewers have mixed results because of how long they wait until packaging, and their fining processes.

I do not recommend sulfite at packaging because there is a better way to avoid oxygen that is mutually exclusive with sulfite ... Spunding!

Further reading:
https://modernbrewhouse.com/wiki/Sulfite
https://modernbrewhouse.com/wiki/Hydrogen_sulfide
Cheers
 
I once dosed a Pineapple Pale Ale with potassium sulfate and potassium metabisulfite, at a rate of 1.0 campden tablet and a 0.5 teaspoon of potassium sorbate per gallon. Fermented with White Labs WLP051 - California Ale V Yeast the sulphur smell was overwhelming four days in.

Fortunately the sulphur wasn’t noticeable after a week of cold crash and carbonation it tasted great.

I just treated my brew water mistakenly with 1 campden tablet per gallon after misreading the label. At those levels will it even be safe to drink?
 
Back
Top