spearko520
Well-Known Member
that's the real big part of christian teaching that is often overlooked in its "practice". i wish there were more theologians out there...As far as I'm concerned no man can truly judge another.
that's the real big part of christian teaching that is often overlooked in its "practice". i wish there were more theologians out there...As far as I'm concerned no man can truly judge another.
...
If I were you, I would concentrate on my higher calling and let the rest work itself out later as you go along.
Verse 21- "Prove all things, holding fast to that which is Good"....... Only you can make the choice as to what is Good, not in your eyes, but in His.
...You think about it, you pray about it, you will figure it out. Hope this helps and God Bless you young fella.
Ron
abstain from all APPEARANCE of evil".
I used to have a pastor who also worked for the gas company. When he had to travel to company meetings he would always take his own car instead of traveling with his female co-worker because he didn't want to give anyone any reason to think he was fooling around. Personally, I think he took it too far as he came off as more self-righteous than "saved by grace", but that was his decision to make. No matter what any of us say, only you can know what is right for you.
Here is what I did last fall. I was being interviewed by a church for my first pastor position after finishing seminary. When speaking on hobbies I told them that I enjoyed brewing and asked if that would be a problem if I kept it discrete. I also said that I viewed one of the roles of pastors is to reform things that God gave us that are good that we have turned into sin. God gave us alcohol as a good thing, like sex. When we use it outside of His intended purposes, getting drunk or sex outside of marriage, then we make it a sin, not the thing itself. Many churches have implied for a long time that there are two kinds of people in regards to alcohol, drunkards and those who do not drink. What about a third option, those who enjoy a good gift without being drunk?
After saying this to the interview committee, they agreed and thought that it was a good idea. I could show by my life a proper use and enjoyment of alcohol.
I would not try to hide it. We don't need to air everything in our lives when we are a pastor, but we do need to address potential hot button issues that we can predict. Also, if you set the right attitude you are more likely to get a "yes" as opposed to your church leaders reacting to someone who found out and got angry. When people at my church find out I tell them that I was given permission to do it and that takes care of it. It has spurred many good conversations. Also, I really needed permission because I am brewing at the church owned parsonage on the same block.
Just curiously (and slightly humorously) though, if you knew that eventually you'd be a pastor, wouldn't you ask these questions way before you got the "gig"? Not an "oh crap, now what do I do"? I mean is seminary training only like a month or two (not being rude, I just don't know)? Didn't you know for a while that this would be coming or did you just never think about it?
The point many are missing is that the issue for the OP was not the morality of drinking/brewing, but the effect it may have on his new congregation. This is not an issue about one individual's ability to drink beer. This is an issue of a leader, who has been selected to shepherd a the souls of people. Sure it would be great if you could reform the misguided beliefs about alcohol consumption, but that should not be your primary objective. Your concern for the growth and health of the congregation should be such that losing your hobby would be a slight concern. I have tried to keep a very loose grip on my homebrewing hobby, as I know being a seminary prof and church leader may require that I leave the brewing for a time. But for now, drinking and brewing have afforded many opportunities for the gospel.
... I didn't want to do anything that might harm my flock. ...
Anyway, in the meantime I think I'm going to go listen to the airlock on my honey wheat bubble.
... I think more important than the religion is the culture ...
My concern is what would all of your grandmas say about it.
... if you knew that eventually you'd be a pastor, wouldn't you ask these questions way before you got the "gig"? Not an "oh crap, now what do I do"? I mean is seminary training only like a month or two (not being rude, I just don't know)? Didn't you know for a while that this would be coming or did you just never think about it?
... I wish seminary was only a month or two - to get into a school with a good reputation, you need a bachelors degree, which I did not have. This means 3 - 4 years of college, then 1 - 4 years for a masters degree from a seminary (if you are like me and have no 'higher' education).![]()
That's a lot of time certification to teach about the bible! In a similar veign we see what the Sadducee's (and others) thought of Peter and John in Acts 4:13 "Now when they beheld the outspokenness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were men unlettered and ordinary, they got to wondering. And they began to recognize about them that they used to be with Jesus". As we all know Peter and John were Apostles and obviously well equipped to teach the word of God![]()
That's a lot of time certification to teach about the bible! ... As we all know Peter and John were Apostles and obviously well equipped to teach the word of God![]()
Yep, they had three years of hard core seminary (day and night) with the greatest biblical scholar who ever lived. Not to mention understanding/familiarity with the biblical languages and good synagogue instruction in their youth.
Any Christian youth should have a full fledged bible education by the time he leaves home, if his father and mother have done their jobs. And while they (Peter and John) did have a definite advantage of having a fleshly Christ to learn from, we have Christ in spirit as well as his Almighty Father to guide us. If you remember, it wasn't until Jesus died that he revealed many of his teachings to his people. I think Christians have every advantage in these times, if not more so than the apostles.Bierliebhaber said:Yep, they had three years of hard core seminary (day and night) with the greatest biblical scholar who ever lived. Not to mention understanding/familiarity with the biblical languages and good synagogue instruction in their youth.
CGish said:Graduating from seminary is not about being able to teach, or any other gift. It is about having a piece of paper to satisfy church by-laws and elder boards.
Any Christian youth should have a full fledged bible education by the time he leaves home, if his father and mother have done their jobs. And while they (Peter and John) did have a definite advantage of having a fleshly Christ to learn from, we have Christ in spirit as well as his Almighty Father to guide us. If you remember, it wasn't until Jesus died that he revealed many of his teachings to his people. I think Christians have every advantage in these times, if not more so than the apostles.
As far as the languages, unless you are somehow involved in Biblical translation work I don't see how Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic are of any specific benefit. By contrast, knowing Spanish would be of much greater value in the land we live in.
I learned to brew at a Church men's ministry meeting.
It's amazing once you start paying attention to it how many times you can read a verse and really wish you knew the original language so that you could understand what subtleties were trying to be portrayed that may be hidden by the translation.
And there's also something to be said for actively studying 2,000 years worth of biblical commentary. Lots of smart people have said a lot of good things that we can benefit from. And that most Christian youths probably don't know that well by the time they leave home.
... It is about having a piece of paper to satisfy church by-laws and elder boards. The real training is a personal faith, and no school can give you that. Had a retired pastor (he held two masters and a doctorate from three different schools) tell me, "when you graduate, you will have to throw out everything you have been taught and start over studying the Word. After you are done with school, your real education will start."
Bierliebhaber said:Yep, they had three years of hard core seminary (day and night) with the greatest biblical scholar who ever lived. Not to mention understanding/familiarity with the biblical languages and good synagogue instruction in their youth.
TarVolon said:It's amazing once you start paying attention to it how many times you can read a verse and really wish you knew the original language so that you could understand what subtleties were trying to be portrayed that may be hidden by the translation.
I suppose all it took was seeing that beer doesn't consume your every thought and desire...
So says the man with 14000 posts.![]()
Here is an interesting quote from Martin Luther. I had never seen it before, but this discussion has me doing some research...
“Whenever the devil harasses you, seek the company of men or drink more, or joke and talk nonsense, or do some other merry thing. Sometimes we must drink more, sport, recreate ourselves, and even sin a little to spite the devil, so that we leave him no place for troubling our consciences with trifles. We are conquered if we try too conscientiously not to sin at all. So when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to.”
Now without the Greek it would be easy to think that the two usages of the word "god" were the same. But one is god in the superlative form(God), while the other is a singular predicate noun, essentially meaning godlike, or divine. So yes, without the Greek translation it would be easy to make the mistake that the Word WAS the God whom he was with.
While the second usage of θεοσ is qualitative, and the Greek is helpful, cultural context is just as important. While the two words come under different grammatical categories, they have the same referent, because John was Jewish, and believed in only one divine being. Cf. the שםע .