Another thought is that with AG you can have a more controlled experience. With beer kits we could hardly reach the recommended pitching temperature even by waiting 15 hours or so, where we would pitch our yeast to 26°C instead of recommended 18-23°C mark, just so we can avoid any infection. But we where risking off flavours that way. After boiling we had our wort to 19°C for yeast pitching in no time. Not to mention that if you have the time to do AG, that's actually the way of making true beer from start to finishanyway, if someone comes across this thread, try to go all grain
![]()
What does AG have to do with pitching temp? The process of getting sugar (however you choose to do it) is fairly well removed from the process of pitching yeast.
Oh, and technically making beer form start to finish would involve growing barley and hops and then malting the barley, but yes, AG is a lot closer to actually making beer than extract or even more so hopped extract. I equate extract to a box of mac and cheese, AG to starting with actual cheese and dried pasta, the hard core guys make their own pasta and cheese, the farmers however are the only ones that can say they actually made it.
I get what you mean. What I wanted to say is that with AG you can actually chill your wort to your desired yeast temp instead of using hot and cold water, a lot of times resulting in hotter/colder wort than desired. If you don't have a frigde that serves cold water or a temp controlled chest freezer it's hit or miss. And what I wanted to say about brewing a beer from start to finish is that you're actually brewing like commercial breweries do.
I still don’t understand why you can’t chill extract to the right temp before pitching your yeast. What am I missing?
People can chill the wort with extract just as well as with all grain but often the extract brewers are new and don't realize the benefits of doing so and often lack the equipment for chilling. The extract kits that I did never mentioned the importance of chilling to a lower pitching temp, just to cool below 80F.
I think what KLM is saying is that he did partial boils with extract and was adding water at the end of the boil to cool his wort and bring the volume up to 5G. He was missing his pitching temps using this method and not using a wort chiller
I think what KLM is saying is that he did partial boils with extract and was adding water at the end of the boil to cool his wort and bring the volume up to 5G. He was missing his pitching temps using this method and not using a wort chiller
Can you explain to me how that process works? Are you not boiling anything? As far as i knew even hopped extracts needed to be boiled. Maybe its something specific to Greece.Just to clarify, I din't mean partial boil in any way, but rather ready, prehopped kits without any grain, just with DME or dextrose directly in the fermenter
Can you explain to me how that process works? Are you not boiling anything? As far as i knew even hopped extracts needed to be boiled. Maybe its something specific to Greece.
Can you explain to me how that process works? Are you not boiling anything? As far as i knew even hopped extracts needed to be boiled. Maybe its something specific to Greece.
Hopped extracts already have the hops boiled to provide the bittering. The only real reason to boil is to provide pasteurization and one doesn't have to boil to provide that. Often boiling is suggested because in the past people lacked decent thermometers and they could still tell if their liquid was hot enough because they could see the boil. Bringing liquid to 160 for 10 seconds pasteurizes. How good is your thermometer?
I think the easy thing here is to stay away from pre hopped extracts.
IMO they are different but not that different taste wise, at least for a beginner. Which is better, that is a matter of opinion. But I enjoy the all grain process more; besides understanding the mash process in general, you get a better understanding of the impact of different grains, how they affect the mash, and ultimately the taste.Just asking?
I have only ever brewed all grain and it takes me 4-5 hours including clean up. My advice is to get an all in one system like the Anvil Foundry.How long does all grain take from start to pinching the yeast? From what i understand its takes a lot longer than extract? How much longer?
You know you're replying to a question that was asked 10 years ago?I have only ever brewed all grain and it takes me 4-5 hours including clean up. My advice is to get an all in one system like the Anvil Foundry.
I started with extract brewing and switched to all grain BIAB. What I like best about all grain is that I am using raw ingredients to make my beer. Good or bad, I own it. With extract, I'm using a vital ingredient which someone else made.
That being said, I also think the taste of my beer improved when switching to all grain. That doesn't mean every all grain batch I brewed turned out amazing. I've had some batches which missed the mark. But they all seem to taste cleaner to me. With my beer, the extract twang was a real thing. I tried to minimize it by doing full volume boils without topping off and also starting with distilled water to keep the minerals in check.
Which ever method you use, you'll be surprised how good your beer turns out. As you fine tune your processes, the quality of your beer will improve with eit
I agree with all you stated. I started with extract, my son went from extract to all grain and the same recipe of my extract converted to all grain was a clean malt taste compared to my extract that had a little different malt taste. I switched to BIAB and love the simplicity but still seems not as refined as a all grain batch. Good beer is all about doing the proper procedure and I feel all grain performed properly refined the qualities of a good recipe.I started with extract brewing and switched to all grain BIAB. What I like best about all grain is that I am using raw ingredients to make my beer. Good or bad, I own it. With extract, I'm using a vital ingredient which someone else made.
That being said, I also think the taste of my beer improved when switching to all grain. That doesn't mean every all grain batch I brewed turned out amazing. I've had some batches which missed the mark. But they all seem to taste cleaner to me. With my beer, the extract twang was a real thing. I tried to minimize it by doing full volume boils without topping off and also starting with distilled water to keep the minerals in check.
Which ever method you use, you'll be surprised how good your beer turns out. As you fine tune your processes, the quality of your beer will improve with either method.
Just to clarify BIAB is all grain it's just a different technique. I notice no difference between it and the batch sparge method I use. I use BIAB for smaller batches and I get the same beer with both methods. So method wise for all grain there is BIAB, batch sparge, no sparge, parti-gyle, and fly sparge.I agree with all you stated. I started with extract, my son went from extract to all grain and the same recipe of my extract converted to all grain was a clean malt taste compared to my extract that had a little different malt taste. I switched to BIAB and love the simplicity but still seems not as refined as a all grain batch. Good beer is all about doing the proper procedure and I feel all grain performed properly refined the qualities of a good recipe.
I’ve never pinched my yeastHow long does all grain take from start to pinching the yeast? From what i understand its takes a lot longer than extract? How much longer?
Something I saw that was crazy cool a few years ago when I toured Coors in Golden, CO was their malting floor. Massive floors with barley in different stages of the process all automated. I was blown away.Macro brewers are almost all extract. Just think about the headaches Budweiser would have to brew with grain in Los Angeles, as they'd have to then transport all the spent grains out of L.A. I'm not convinced Budweiser is a great beer either.
You should see the huge grain silos near Fargo, ND with the big Budweiser lettering on the side of them. No, the big macro brewers brew all grain as it cuts costs.Macro brewers are almost all extract. Just think about the headaches Budweiser would have to brew with grain in Los Angeles, as they'd have to then transport all the spent grains out of L.A. I'm not convinced Budweiser is a great beer either.
I have to agreeMajor competitions have been won with extract recipes. I am far from an expert on why the reported extract twang shows up, at least in some brews but not others. Could it depend on the particular extract used or something in the brewer’s technique? I don’t know.
Yup. There are times when some HomeBrewTalk topics are stuck in the past.Reading this thread about twang is interesting since no one have definitively posted on the so called twang but rather second hand anecdotes.
I own it.
You've got us all beat with your gangsta brewing. Hell, I've seen your pics. But if your ever doing a drive by in my hood, bring a six pack.straight up gangster talk! but were all friends and mostly not trying do drive bys!
but hell i malt my own, so i got you m'fer!![]()
![]()
It does take longer but I have done extract brews in as little as 90 minutes, depending on volume.How long does all grain take from start to pinching the yeast? From what i understand its takes a lot longer than extract? How much longer?
I can confirm that based on my own experiences!All-Grain tastes better, except for those times when Extract tastes better.
Basic Brewing Radio (Aug 25 / Nov 17 2005) has the information related to ingredients and extract twang.I am far from an expert on why the reported extract twang shows up, at least in some brews but not others.
Enter your email address to join:
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
Enter your email address to join: