• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Cleanest lager yeast between 65-72F?

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
My main goal is to have a neutral yeast that gets out of the way and lets all of the other ingredients do the talking. If I can get S-189 cheap enough, I'll probably give it a try. It sounds like most really like it and I haven't even heard anything bad about it. It sounds like it lets the malt shine more than 34/70 and I'm sure it would let the hops shine too.
3470 is much cleaner afaik.
 
Can you talk more about your experience with S23?

I avoided it for many years because of the "fruit salad" thing, but recently tried it and think it is great, at 15c. S189, i find, as you say, malty. Great, consistent, easy to work with, but very very clean for me. I quite like the mild ester of S23.

I've never enjoyed 34/70, just my tastebuds i guess. It's clearly a widely used yeast that many people love, just not me.
It's a great yeast in my opinion. It also accentuates malt, especially when you add (light) crystal malts. I made that mistake once and it was a bit overpowering. It can give off diacetyl when rushed, but if you take your time the outcome is very good. I've made a few märzens with it where I enjoyed a slight flowery hop note and maybe a touch of fruit, but enjoyable. I've also done a Munich/Izabella SMaSH that wasn't bad iirc, but I'd also not brewed that much back then. I've done a Czech-like lager which was fine, but I don't care for the style much. I tried a tropical stout which was disappointing because there was no fruitiness at all. I made that before I had temperature control at room temperature near the radiator, but it was clean as could be. I've done a Corona clone that I also really enjoyed, although it wasn't close to the original (luckily). I did an IPL which was also very good, but there fruitiness would probably get lost. I've done a couple of rauchbieren with it which were all very good. It's one of my favourite styles and I think this is my preferred yeast.
I've tried it three times under pressure at ~14°C. First was a rauchbier that turned out a bit lighter than planned, but very tasty after as little as four weeks of lagering. The second keg is conditioning now and it's also getting very tasty. I've also done a pilsner that is so good I'm having a hard time letting it condition. Last is a Baltic porter where I think I hit the ABV limit, because the FG is a bit high. Tasty beer though. None are fruity.
I've done it at cold temperatures ~10°C and without temperature control in winter where it likely wouldn't have gotten over 18°C (and that's stretching it, my house is very cold) except for the tropical stout. The warmest was probably the last one before I put it under pressure, which was a Comet SMaSH. Came out pretty much like a clean pale ale. None of these temperatures have caused any issues.

These were all my notes that mentioned S-23. Going over everything made me confirm this is probably just my favourite lager yeast, because I liked pretty much all of them a lot.

What temperature are you fermenting at, how much are you pitching, into how many gallons, and what is your pitching/rehydration procedure? I've not tried fermenting with this strain any warmer than 55°F.
I don't rehydrate, just direct pitch. The first was 11g/20L at ~13°C and pitched warm before cooling like Lallemand advises as well. I raised the temperature to 22°C after a week or so. Probably an underpitch in this case. I've also done 11g in 4.5L followed by serial repitches at 12°C and afterwards 'cellar temp', because I didn't like what I got from the first beer and didn't bother with it taking up space in the fridge.
 
My main goal is to have a neutral yeast that gets out of the way and lets all of the other ingredients do the talking. If I can get S-189 cheap enough, I'll probably give it a try. It sounds like most really like it and I haven't even heard anything bad about it. It sounds like it lets the malt shine more than 34/70 and I'm sure it would let the hops shine too.
I want to do another round of comparisons next year to include S-23, but in my tests hops didn't shine super bright using S-189. They were definitely there, but not like 34/70. I don't like how much of the malt flavour it typically strips though, especially in European styles.
S-189 can stall sometimes though. I've had it stop around 1.020 (from around 1.048-1.055), but it would continue after transfer. When bottling that can be quite annoying. The latest batch I've used didn't have that though, so maybe it was one particular lot of yeast. Still, I would use it again. I really like this in smoked beers (doppelbock for example).
 
I don't rehydrate, just direct pitch. The first was 11g/20L at ~13°C and pitched warm before cooling like Lallemand advises as well. I raised the temperature to 22°C after a week or so. Probably an underpitch in this case. I've also done 11g in 4.5L followed by serial repitches at 12°C and afterwards 'cellar temp', because I didn't like what I got from the first beer and didn't bother with it taking up space in the fridge.

Where does Lallemand say to do this? Nobody says to do this. Lallemand recommends rehydrating at high temperatures, but nowhere do they say to pitch lager yeast into "warm" wort. I almost guarantee this is what caused your ester formation. Yeast ferment very quickly at higher temperatures, and also produce far more esters at higher temperatures. Additionally, once yeast get started chewing away at a beer, they generate heat, making cooling the wort harder to do. Also, if you aren't measuring the temperature in the fermentor, but measuring it externally, the wort could easily far, far hotter than your temperature controlled fridge if that is what you are using, even once the wort is cooled. For example on my Inkbird controlled fridges, I must set the setpoint about 1°C lower than my target fermentation temp.
 
Where does Lallemand say to do this? Nobody says to do this. Lallemand recommends rehydrating at high temperatures, but nowhere do they say to pitch lager yeast into "warm" wort. I almost guarantee this is what caused your ester formation. Yeast ferment very quickly at higher temperatures, and also produce far more esters at higher temperatures. Additionally, once yeast get started chewing away at a beer, they generate heat, making cooling the wort harder to do. Also, if you aren't measuring the temperature in the fermentor, but measuring it externally, the wort could easily far, far hotter than your temperature controlled fridge if that is what you are using, even once the wort is cooled. For example on my Inkbird controlled fridges, I must set the setpoint about 1°C lower than my target fermentation temp.

Warm is relative. I'm not pitching pitching at 35°C, 25°C at most and I insulate my probe whilst also setting the target temperature two or three degrees lower depending on the gravity. I get to the correct temperature well before fermentation actually starts. The second time I pitched colder (12°C when starting my split batches) and had the same result. I did this colder to see if I could somehow get rid of it. The repitches at higher temperatures had the same level of red apple to me, but like I said, I didn't care at that point. The warm fermented lager thread is also full of people using it warm with supposedly good results. I detect red apple in many Lallemand yeasts, but Diamond and NovaLager are the worst (and arguably should have it the least). NL is in my opinion also terrible because it should be able to handle warmer conditions, yet it's not clean at all to me. For some reason red apple is listed for NL, but not for Diamond.

I might try it once more as cold as I can get with more than enough CFUs, but I'm sceptical.
 
Warm is relative. I'm not pitching pitching at 35°C, 25°C at most and I insulate my probe whilst also setting the target temperature two or three degrees lower depending on the gravity.

25°C is enough to get plenty of ale yeast throwing weird and wonderful esters, let alone lager yeasts.
 
Just out of curiosity, has anyone tried fermenting 34/70 at 72F (actual wort temp)? If so, what were the results?
 
You might want to look up the "warm fermented lager thread".

It's been done quite often. It works. It's just a tad fruity.
Man, I checked out that thread and it's a gold mine. Thanks! I think I'll try CS German at 72F for my next beer, then maybe S-189 down the line. Judging by that thread, it should turn out alright.
 
Does anyone here know if 34/70 would make hops pop more than something like US-05 or S-04? I'm sure this has been discussed somewhere at some point, but I'm not finding it and I'm just curious about any opinions here.

I'd LOVE to have the time to experiment with every type of yeast and ingredient, but I barely have any time to brew anymore (or do anything fun for that matter 🤣) and any time I do brew it takes me a while to finish a batch, so my brew days are sadly very few and far between.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone here know if 34/70 would make hops pop more than something like US-05 or S-04? I'm sure this has been discussed somewhere at some point, but I'm not finding it and I'm just curious about any opinions here.

I'd LOVE to have the time to experiment with every type of yeast and ingredient, but I barely have any time to brew anymore (or do anything fun for that matter 🤣) and any time I do brew it takes me a while to finish a batch, so my brew days are sadly very few and far between.
In my opinion, 3470 is one of, if not the most hop promoting yeast out there. No matter lager or ale yeast.

I've used this one extensively myself and would prefer it to all the other lager yeasts I've tried, when it comes to hoppy (speaking of American hops, of course) and clean ales.
 
In my opinion, 3470 is one of, if not the most hop promoting yeast out there. No matter lager or ale yeast.

I've used this one extensively myself and would prefer it to all the other lager yeasts I've tried, when it comes to hoppy (speaking of American hops, of course) and clean ales.
Nice! I tried it once for an IPA and it turned out to be the best beer I've made by a wide margin. Wasn't sure if it was just a fluke or not. 😆 Using it as my primary yeast seems like kind of a no brainer to me. Thanks!
 
Nice! I tried it once for an IPA and it turned out to be the best beer I've made by a wide margin. Wasn't sure if it was just a fluke or not. 😆 Using it as my primary yeast seems like kind of a no brainer to me. Thanks!
The only downside is that it does not flocc well. Otherwise, great yeast.
 
Nobody said California Lager yeast, like Wyeast 2112? It has that temp range and says do not ferment cold. I haven’t used this yeast for years but I think its pretty clean.
 
The only downside is that it does not flocc well. Otherwise, great yeast.
True, but as long as it makes good beer I can't complain. We can't have it all, can we?! Maybe someday there will be a yeast like 34/70 that drops like a rock. That will be the day!
 
Now that I think about it, how long does it usually take for 34/70 to drop clear with cold crashing?
 
It's been several years since I've used it, but before I had a fermentation fridge I fermented WLP925 under pressure at 65-68F and I felt it was very clean. Made several American light lagers, German pils, and Märzens, though I feel it was best suited for the light lagers that weren't malt-forward.
 
Only experience was Mangrove Jack's M54 Californian Lager yeast. Which came with a Californian Common AG kit (from TMM UK) brewed last month.

Fermented at 18-20°C (64-68 °F) it certainly gave a clean flavour, with no sulphur apparent an any stage, and cleared well. Will certainly do a larger brew this summer.
M54 wasn't such a polished clean taste as Wyeast 2000 Budvar, but was so much quicker and easier.
Update: Poor flocculation, and certainly not good as a bottling yeast.
After a month,though clear the, bottles still had 1/2 inch layer of loose solids. On pouring, the very bottom yeast layer, just mixed in with everything else.
 
I have Novalager going now, split the batch, half warm under pressure and the other my traditional cold lager schedule. Will be a couple weeks but bringing the results to a club meeting for feedback.
Hey! Wondering if you have an update on this. I’ll be brewing a light lager with Novalager here soon. I plan on doing it under pressure with no temp control. It will be in my basement so will probably stay in the 65-70 F range.
 
Hey! Wondering if you have an update on this. I’ll be brewing a light lager with Novalager here soon. I plan on doing it under pressure with no temp control. It will be in my basement so will probably stay in the 65-70 F range.
Personally, I'd still rather use 34/70 warm at 65 than Novalager.

I was surprised at how well it was at warmer temps. Even better if you put the fermenter in a bucket with some water and toss a couple ice packs in the water right before peak fermentation and then let it free ride from there. 34/70 is clean.
 
Personally, I'd still rather use 34/70 warm at 65 than Novalager.

I was surprised at how well it was at warmer temps. Even better if you put the fermenter in a bucket with some water and toss a couple ice packs in the water right before peak fermentation and then let it free ride from there. 34/70 is clean.
Thanks! I have never used Novalager before but I’m looking forward to trying it out. If it doesn’t turn out well, I will probably try the same recipe with 34/70. I was really bouncing back and forth between the two options.
 
I haven't used NovaLager, but I just made an IPA with 34/70 fermented at 68 F (not under pressure) and it turned out very clean. Nothing except hops and malt, which is what I'm after. It would be hard to beat 34/70.
 
Hey! Wondering if you have an update on this. I’ll be brewing a light lager with Novalager here soon. I plan on doing it under pressure with no temp control. It will be in my basement so will probably stay in the 65-70 F range.
Sorry , I posted this over on the Warm Fermented Lager thread a few days ago forgot to update here.

Did a simple Helles, 10-gal batch. Split it and warm pressure (WP) fermented (8-12lbs, 65 degrees) and cold fermented (no pressure, 52 degrees), both for 14 days using Nova Lager. When the cold fermented raised for diacetyl rest, lowered the WP to this temp, then crashed both together and kegged. Sat in my keezer for 10-weeks under the same pressure. Took samples to my club meeting, did a three way test. 9 folks took the test, 2 BJCP Certified Judges, 2 Pro Brewers, 2 homebrewers and 3 avid beer drinkers. 2 samples of the cold lager and one of the WP were given out. 5 correctly picked out the WP being the different beer. Also asked, which beer they want to drink more of and that was pretty split. Unfortunately, some folks put down multiple numbers. Next time I'll be clear to put only one. Got to tell you, I was very impressed with the WP. It's a great beer. I'm a die hard lager fan and lager brewer. I always cold ferment, because I can and I'm not in a hurry to get it on tap (well, try not to be.) The reason I waited 10-weeks to do the test was the club only meets once a month and the previous meetings had too much going on to get people focused. Nothing statistical here, but an interesting test and had fun doing it. Nova Lager does a good clean lager.
 
Sorry , I posted this over on the Warm Fermented Lager thread a few days ago forgot to update here.

Did a simple Helles, 10-gal batch. Split it and warm pressure (WP) fermented (8-12lbs, 65 degrees) and cold fermented (no pressure, 52 degrees), both for 14 days using Nova Lager. When the cold fermented raised for diacetyl rest, lowered the WP to this temp, then crashed both together and kegged. Sat in my keezer for 10-weeks under the same pressure. Took samples to my club meeting, did a three way test. 9 folks took the test, 2 BJCP Certified Judges, 2 Pro Brewers, 2 homebrewers and 3 avid beer drinkers. 2 samples of the cold lager and one of the WP were given out. 5 correctly picked out the WP being the different beer. Also asked, which beer they want to drink more of and that was pretty split. Unfortunately, some folks put down multiple numbers. Next time I'll be clear to put only one. Got to tell you, I was very impressed with the WP. It's a great beer. I'm a die hard lager fan and lager brewer. I always cold ferment, because I can and I'm not in a hurry to get it on tap (well, try not to be.) The reason I waited 10-weeks to do the test was the club only meets once a month and the previous meetings had too much going on to get people focused. Nothing statistical here, but an interesting test and had fun doing it. Nova Lager does a good clean lager.
Good to hear! Thanks for the update!
 
Back
Top