• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Brü's Views with John Wible | On The Hazy Beer Controversy

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This whole debate is hilarious. Writing off a whole "category" of beers because of looks. You know what? good. It just means more for me.
 
And where are they located? West Coast I believe? I bet the Germans said the same thing about those crazy Belgians and their awful beers! It's funny how most of the people who don't like these beers are either on the West Coast, or old. "Those damn kids and their hazy beer!!" I believe if you check BA, the top 50 beers list is dominated by these new IPAs. I just returned from a trip to VT on Thursday with a bounty of these. Hill Farmstead has been named the best brewery in the world for the past 2 years. Their IPAs are amazing!! Too bad you West Coast people don't have a chance to try them, since they only do growlers of their hoppy beers. I guess if it isn't clear, and it doesn't strip the enamel off your teeth, it can't be good beer! BTW, that Konkey Dong stuff just does look gross. None of the good NE IPAs look like that.

Who rated them best brewery in the world? What is their distribution that they can claim that?

All of these "best of" lists are just ridiculous. I'm going to start a list right now....


This whole debate is hilarious. Writing off a whole "category" of beers because of looks. You know what? good. It just means more for me.

Yes people taste with their eyes. It's unappealing. You can have that beer. And when the next hop shortage hits (and it will) we'll see a shake out that will make 1995 look like child's play. They won't be able to hide all of this "flavors" anymore.
 
When I go to a nice restaurant I expect a nice presentation as well as good tasting food. I feel the same way about beer. Obviously taste comes first. A beautiful beer that tastes like trash isn't worth a thing. But a great tasting beer that looks like trash dosnt have that "gimmy, gimmy, gimmy" factor. Now a beer that tastes great and looks great as well is what I feel I should get if I'm shelling out my cash for it.
But that's just me.
 
Who rated them best brewery in the world? What is their distribution that they can claim that?

All of these "best of" lists are just ridiculous. I'm going to start a list right now....

Hill Farmstead does turn out some phenomenal beers..... Their Saisons are actually probably better than their IPA's or hoppy beers.

They are among the best of the best for sure.

That said, I agree that the "best of" lists are ridiculous. And, their "best in the world" title is based off of ratings on beer advocate or rate beer.... or the like. A HUGE aspect of that simply comes down to a few things:
*Unless it is IPA's, RIS's, Barrel aged or special release...... it does not get rated very highly.
*If it is easy to get - it doesn't get rated as highly as if it is hard to get.
*People who "rate" these beers generally don't take anything into consideration other than their love for a style of beer. The worlds best pilsner will get rated lower than a decent IPA every time.

Unless beers are getting judged blind, the hype factor always ways in and skews the outcome.

But, yeah - Hill Farmstead is really great. I don't like Saisons that much..... but, I could drink theirs all day, every day.
 
Who rated them best brewery in the world? What is their distribution that they can claim that?

All of these "best of" lists are just ridiculous. I'm going to start a list right now....




Yes people taste with their eyes. It's unappealing. You can have that beer. And when the next hop shortage hits (and it will) we'll see a shake out that will make 1995 look like child's play. They won't be able to hide all of this "flavors" anymore.

I agree with you that the best of lists are just dumb. I also agree that the limited supply of these beers is boosting the hype. However they are good.

The "unappealing" thing just amuses me. Do you avoid other styles that we've accepted should be cloudy or hazy? If not why is it ok for them and not these? Allagash fought for years to get people to try their white, which got the same "ew it's cloudy" response, now that beer is what funds their operation.

The whole argument just has me envisioning a bunch of old guys yelling to get off their lawns.
 
Hill Farmstead does turn out some phenomenal beers..... Their Saisons are actually probably better than their IPA's or hoppy beers.

They are among the best of the best for sure.

That said, I agree that the "best of" lists are ridiculous. And, their "best in the world" title is based off of ratings on beer advocate or rate beer.... or the like. A HUGE aspect of that simply comes down to a few things:
*Unless it is IPA's, RIS's, Barrel aged or special release...... it does not get rated very highly.
*If it is easy to get - it doesn't get rated as highly as if it is hard to get.
*People who "rate" these beers generally don't take anything into consideration other than their love for a style of beer. The worlds best pilsner will get rated lower than a decent IPA every time.

Unless beers are getting judged blind, the hype factor always ways in and skews the outcome.

But, yeah - Hill Farmstead is really great. I don't like Saisons that much..... but, I could drink theirs all day, every day.

I've had a few of their beers and they were good. I'm not knocking them.:)

I just find it absurd when I see "top beer" list. As we can see from this thread taste is subjective :) I used to be one of the people that had to have ever "best" beer ever made. It's was a lot of disappointment and wasted money.

Just like a lot of these beers probably taste good to many. Tired hands puts out a lot of amazing beers.
 
Honestly, no it's not appealing. It's looks like a poorly made beer. But it's not the "haze" that makes me feel that way. Its the lack of head and color.


This is just a sample pour, after I took a sip, it had a head. And color? I didn't realize pilsners were horrible beers
 
Going to check out the article now, just read the thread. That donkey kong beer does not look appealing at all. However the Julius looks amazing.

I had a couple cans of Tired Hands Pineal IPA recently and I thought it was great. Hoppy and smooth without being bitter. I'm hooked, I want more of these kinds of beers and I will try to brew a few myself this spring/summer. They're not better than West Coast IPA's, just different and, in my opinion, just as great in their own right.
 
So you took a picture of a Pilsner and tried to get me to say it was an unappealing IPA?? I got news if that's a Pilsner that is far worse. No Pilsner should ever be cloudy. And should have a long lasting head.

Appearance of a Pilsner.

Straw to light gold, brilliant to very clear, with a creamy, long-lasting white head.

If your referencing simply the color I've never seen a Pilsner look like that. There is a slight brown hue to it.
 
This is just a sample pour, after I took a sip, it had a head. And color? I didn't realize pilsners were horrible beers

oh, well, why didn't you say it was a pilsner?

yes, it is a horrible pilsner, because they're supposed to be brilliant to very clear

may taste good, but serious dings on style for appearance
 
So you took a picture of a Pilsner and tried to get me to say it was an unappealing IPA?? I got news if that's a Pilsner that is far worse. No lager should ever be cloudy.

Appearance of a Pilsner.

Straw to light gold, brilliant to very clear, with a creamy, long-lasting white head.

If your referencing simply the color I've never seen a Pilsner look like that. There is a sligh brown hue to it.


No I mean if you think a lack of color is unappealing, what do you think of pilsners?

There are even fantastic west coast style IPAs that are light in color, I see no problem with that.
 
Going to check out the article now, just read the thread. That donkey kong beer does not look appealing at all. However the Julius looks amazing.

I had a couple cans of Tired Hands Pineal IPA recently and I thought it was great. Hoppy and smooth without being bitter. I'm hooked, I want more of these kinds of beers and I will try to brew a few myself this spring/summer. They're not better than West Coast IPA's, just different and, in my opinion, just as great in their own right.


I agree completely, they're just a different style.

hefeweizens and kristalweizens: Are they different? Yes. Both good? Yes.
 
This whole debate is hilarious. Writing off a whole "category" of beers because of looks. You know what? good. It just means more for me.

Exactly! I wish the lines were a little shorter anyway.

This will be a quaint discussion to look back upon in a few years, after the style is refined to a point where every brewery will have a NE IPA in their rotation.

Remember back when some people thought West Coast IPAs tasted like Pine-sol and weren't anything like the IPAs of the time...now West Coast IPAs are what you get when you order an IPA and the old IPAs are now pale ales.

So it goes...
 
Hazy beer is fine.

But this looks like someone ladled out some of my toilet water into a glass moments after my morning diarrhea.

tl9OSE6.jpg
 
Hazy beer is fine.

But this looks like someone ladled out some of my toilet water into a glass moments after my morning diarrhea.

tl9OSE6.jpg

gross.

it's like when a keg kicks and spews an ounce or so of keg sludge into a beer...it still tastes ok but i just can't bring myself to drink it. i guess everyone has a different tolerance when it comes to the appearance of their beer.
 
Yeah, I'll admit some of those "murky" beers look atrocious. It's as if a brewer thought to himself, "Gosh, those hazy NEIPAs are getting pretty popular. Well if a little haze is good, then 10x more haze will be 10x more better!" Those are probably the guys that you hear about adding flour to the boil. Of the NEIPAs that I've had, mostly from Treehouse and Hill Farmstead, they actually looked delicious to me, as well as taste amazing. But then again, I think Hefes and Witbiers look delicious too, even though I don't particularly like wheat beers.
 
APA not spa! My point is it is very good, yeast free, and cloudy due to water chemistry and elevated protein/carbohydrates remaining after a bad mash.
 
Hazy beer is fine.

But this looks like someone ladled out some of my toilet water into a glass moments after my morning diarrhea.

tl9OSE6.jpg

Yes, that looks disgusting. That's why you have to try it from the top brewers of the style! Obviously not every brewer can make a great NE IPA. Because I wouldn't drink this, or the Donkey Kong one.
 
Has anyone here actually drank any top ne ipas? Trillium, treehouse, hill farmstead, grimm, bissel? They have a mouthfeel that no other ipas style compares to. Its like biting into a cloud of juice. Almost feels like it evaporates off the palate and has no harsh bitterness or astringency. These are well made beers. Are all clear filtered ipas good? Hell no! So why you scared of some haze. Don't knock em till you try em!
 
Though a huge beer and brewing geek I'm not a trader, wait in line, gotta have the latest xyz, gonna tick it off my list consumer. Thus, living in the deep south I've never had any of these NE IPAs. Fwiw I love the trend of big hoppy juicy with less bitterness beers. Sometimes I want bitter, sometimes I don't. Clearly, no pun intended, a beer that looks like cappuccino is 'different' in the modern marketplace. Does that mean bad? I'd say no unless it has needless protein chuncks (which it's defenders say aren't there) or tons of needless sediment that could be cleared simply by proper racking and crashing techniques.

So my question is, how are these beers made PROCESS-WISE that makes them different? Not talking recipe except for water, which I understand is a BIG part of it due to ... is it higher calcium content? Are they purposefully leaving starches/proteins in the mash/adding grains late in the mash that effects this?
 
So my question is, how are these beers made PROCESS-WISE that makes them different? Not talking recipe except for water, which I understand is a BIG part of it due to ... is it higher calcium content? Are they purposefully leaving starches/proteins in the mash/adding grains late in the mash that effects this?

This is how I go about doing it:
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/showthread.php?t=568046

There is a Facebook page called Tree House Home Brewers where people kick around various ideas to.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1651130348490612/
 
So my question is, how are these beers made PROCESS-WISE that makes them different? Not talking recipe except for water, which I understand is a BIG part of it due to ... is it higher calcium content? Are they purposefully leaving starches/proteins in the mash/adding grains late in the mash that effects this?

I've stopped adding any finings to my beers. Just one less expense and I don't cold crash either. My beers are pretty hazy. My IPAS are very hazy. First 10 pints look a lot like the "good looking" NE-style pics posted.

In fact, I know the keg is almost gone when I can start to see my hand through the pint glass, this is often a month in...

You already hit on one aspect, water profile. I push mine to the limit, basically burtonize my water. Wheat (malt and flaked) really help. Less flocculant yeast strains, no crashing, packing when ready instead of letting it age, and a big dry hop should get you there (I double dry hop and keg hop.) While not necessary, the easy go-around is to add flour.
 
Back
Top