NervousDad
BFM
Honestly, no it's not appealing. It's looks like a poorly made beer. But it's not the "haze" that makes me feel that way. Its the lack of head and color.
And where are they located? West Coast I believe? I bet the Germans said the same thing about those crazy Belgians and their awful beers! It's funny how most of the people who don't like these beers are either on the West Coast, or old. "Those damn kids and their hazy beer!!" I believe if you check BA, the top 50 beers list is dominated by these new IPAs. I just returned from a trip to VT on Thursday with a bounty of these. Hill Farmstead has been named the best brewery in the world for the past 2 years. Their IPAs are amazing!! Too bad you West Coast people don't have a chance to try them, since they only do growlers of their hoppy beers. I guess if it isn't clear, and it doesn't strip the enamel off your teeth, it can't be good beer! BTW, that Konkey Dong stuff just does look gross. None of the good NE IPAs look like that.
This whole debate is hilarious. Writing off a whole "category" of beers because of looks. You know what? good. It just means more for me.
Who rated them best brewery in the world? What is their distribution that they can claim that?
All of these "best of" lists are just ridiculous. I'm going to start a list right now....
Who rated them best brewery in the world? What is their distribution that they can claim that?
All of these "best of" lists are just ridiculous. I'm going to start a list right now....
Yes people taste with their eyes. It's unappealing. You can have that beer. And when the next hop shortage hits (and it will) we'll see a shake out that will make 1995 look like child's play. They won't be able to hide all of this "flavors" anymore.
Hill Farmstead does turn out some phenomenal beers..... Their Saisons are actually probably better than their IPA's or hoppy beers.
They are among the best of the best for sure.
That said, I agree that the "best of" lists are ridiculous. And, their "best in the world" title is based off of ratings on beer advocate or rate beer.... or the like. A HUGE aspect of that simply comes down to a few things:
*Unless it is IPA's, RIS's, Barrel aged or special release...... it does not get rated very highly.
*If it is easy to get - it doesn't get rated as highly as if it is hard to get.
*People who "rate" these beers generally don't take anything into consideration other than their love for a style of beer. The worlds best pilsner will get rated lower than a decent IPA every time.
Unless beers are getting judged blind, the hype factor always ways in and skews the outcome.
But, yeah - Hill Farmstead is really great. I don't like Saisons that much..... but, I could drink theirs all day, every day.
Honestly, no it's not appealing. It's looks like a poorly made beer. But it's not the "haze" that makes me feel that way. Its the lack of head and color.
This is just a sample pour, after I took a sip, it had a head. And color? I didn't realize pilsners were horrible beers
So you took a picture of a Pilsner and tried to get me to say it was an unappealing IPA?? I got news if that's a Pilsner that is far worse. No lager should ever be cloudy.
Appearance of a Pilsner.
Straw to light gold, brilliant to very clear, with a creamy, long-lasting white head.
If your referencing simply the color I've never seen a Pilsner look like that. There is a sligh brown hue to it.
Going to check out the article now, just read the thread. That donkey kong beer does not look appealing at all. However the Julius looks amazing.
I had a couple cans of Tired Hands Pineal IPA recently and I thought it was great. Hoppy and smooth without being bitter. I'm hooked, I want more of these kinds of beers and I will try to brew a few myself this spring/summer. They're not better than West Coast IPA's, just different and, in my opinion, just as great in their own right.
This whole debate is hilarious. Writing off a whole "category" of beers because of looks. You know what? good. It just means more for me.
Hazy beer is fine.
But this looks like someone ladled out some of my toilet water into a glass moments after my morning diarrhea.
![]()
This thread.
Hazy beer is fine.
But this looks like someone ladled out some of my toilet water into a glass moments after my morning diarrhea.
![]()
Hazy beer is fine.
But this looks like someone ladled out some of my toilet water into a glass moments after my morning diarrhea.
![]()
So my question is, how are these beers made PROCESS-WISE that makes them different? Not talking recipe except for water, which I understand is a BIG part of it due to ... is it higher calcium content? Are they purposefully leaving starches/proteins in the mash/adding grains late in the mash that effects this?
So my question is, how are these beers made PROCESS-WISE that makes them different? Not talking recipe except for water, which I understand is a BIG part of it due to ... is it higher calcium content? Are they purposefully leaving starches/proteins in the mash/adding grains late in the mash that effects this?