Bells suing a small brewer

[smcinco]

Is this your FB post, Larry?

https://youtu.be/5SqDm0_GgfQ

 

[JonM]

Is this your FB post, Larry?

https://youtu.be/5SqDm0_GgfQ

.

 

[Gonefishin]

Sorry Bells. I "used" to drink your beers. I happen to be fortunate enough to live close enough to INNOVATION to have tried and enjoyed their exceptional brews. (I have decided they are my favorite micro, really good beers if you are anywhere close to Sylva, NC.) Really Bell's? These guys brew a fraction of the beer that Bell's brews. This is like BMC, big corporate bullies versus little guy battles. I am so dissapointed to hear about this law suit. No more Bell's for me untill I learn more about this BS. Hey Bell's RDWHAHB!! Or better yet, an Innovation brew! JM2C

 

[hunter_le five]

I am so dissapointed to hear about this law suit.

 

[bob1852]

The anger is justified. I mean, it's not every day that Bell's sends anthrax to the owner of a smaller brewery.

 

[harrydrez]

Here's the email I just sent Larry Bell:

Mr. Bell,

I was very disappointed to hear of your decision to sue Innovation brewing just because of a bumper sticker. You produced 310,000 barrels of beer last year, are in 18 states, and are very well respected in the craft beer community. I say community because that is what it used to be, but actions like this are sickening and cheapen the entire experience for everyone. In contrast, Innovation made only 500 barrels last year and are not available outside of North Carolina. Your decision to sue them because their BREWERY NAME uses one word from a bumper sticker you give away for free will likely put them out of business as the owners go broke fighting this useless legal battle. There is no way you can come out of this looking like anything other than a bully. Now you have sunk to the level of Tony Magee at Lagunitas, and I doubt that is how you want to be perceived. I hope that you see reason and stop this inane lawsuit. Until then, I have certainly had my last Bell's beer, and I will be spreading the word.

Am I the only one that heard sad violin music while reading this? Give me a break man. Move out of daddy's basement and learn how the business world works.

 

[kombat]

I disagree, Bell's is out of line. The small brewery isn't hurting them.

Yet.

If they get the trademark approval, then they could unleash the lawyers.

 

[GRBC]

My understanding is that you don't have to register a trademark with the USPTO for a slogan to be protected from infringement if you can demonstrate prior commercial use as an element of of your brand. The problem with not protecting your brand is that if you give an inch to one friendly, non-threatening party over something peripheral like "innovation", by your inaction, you risk being forced to accept another, unfriendly party taking a mile with something much more central to your brand like say "inspired" or images of bells, etc. We may question how politely they acted in defense of their rights, but we should understand why they are correct to do so.

 

[eatmorefrogs]

In my experience, most of the time a lawsuit is not the first step. Usually you send them a letter, call from your lawyer, severed horse head, etc. first.

I'm curious to hear who was the big ol' meanie face during that process.

 

[tgmartin000]

.

See what happens, Larry? See what happens when you fck a stranger in the @ss?

 

[masaba]

This stuff is just ridiculous, and I hope that our legal system someday comes to the realization that blatantly obvious or overly broad slogans or ideas should not be the property of any one company. It seems here that Bell's is trying to big-ball their way into exclusive rights of calling their beer innovative or inspired. In my opinion, no way should this be allowed. You see this in the software industry all the time, where individuals or companies patent such inspired ideas as 'a button on a web-log that you can press to give a post a +1 or -1.'

 

[Highside]

Update from Innovation...

"Yesterday, we offered Bell's another co-existence agreement to resolve this dispute, since Bell's management has indicated an interest in resolution via their many facebook and newspaper statements. We are going to sit back and wait a few days in hopes that cooler heads can prevail and an agreement can actually be reached. Fingers crossed.

To Clear Up Any Confusion:
Should this opposition have been filed? That is the question we encourage everyone to ponder. Public sentiment has forced Bell's into a defensive position advised by their consulting team: an outside PR firm, a New York City IP law firm and a Michigan law firm. And the result of their campaign insinuates that we are liars and that craft brew fans cannot muster the comprehension to stay focused on the merits of the action. We know better. This is the most intelligent group of consumers out there. So we want to take a moment to discuss the case itself.

A “run-of-the-mill” trademark dispute, to use Larry Bell’s own words, is one where a brand owner has a registered mark that clearly matches an infringer’s mark. Bell’s Brewery has 20 registered trademarks and 3 more in the same process as our mark. If someone files for an application for something like “Inspired Beer Co” we expect a run-of-the-mill dispute to be raised and resolved in a matter of days. But when an applicant files a mark that does not look like, sound like or mean anything close to “Inspired” then it’s not “run-of-the-mill” at all, in fact it is not even a dispute. As for an unregistered word used in a marketing slogan (see “bottling innovation since 1985&#8221, the protection is almost non-existent. Think of how many words are used in a brewery’s lifetime in a marketing statement. There are probably thousands, over 30 years. If a brewery feels that it is part of its brand, it would have protected it. This is especially true when the brewery is adept at filing for trademarks, such as Bell's. That was not the case here. Like Bell's would do, we searched far and wide before selecting a brand name. And we are asking for the same protection that they have been afforded 20+ times.

In the early days of this dispute, when we were asked what our brand was worth, we told them a lot. We did not expect that to be used against us as proposing a settlement figure. Our brand was not for sale, and it's not for sale now. We fully believe we can come to an agreement with Bell's, and we will never ask them for compensation. An agreement would let both breweries use our existing brands going forward, because consumers are not likely to be confused.

Bell’s, we just don't think you should have filed it. We believe that it lacks merit, and the impact has been an unfortunate, costly, and lengthy heartache for all. Let’s settle it. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on our most recent coexistence agreement and truly look forward to a resolution."

 

[Teromous]

There's only one way to settle this now!

 

[DogStar]

It's pathetic.

 

[DogStar]

Does this mean I'll have to start calling my bell end something else?

 

[Weezy]

I can see Bell's point. They should have trademarked it if they felt so strongly about it, but didn't. They feel forced to defend themselves this way. But they can suck hockey pucks after reading Ms. Bell's creatively twisted phrasing in that facebook post. They should have went to Innovative and asked for a free license to keep using their innovation phrase. IB might very well have done it. I hobe the ABA and other IB friends are filing amicus briefs.

 

[Weezy]

. As for an unregistered word used in a marketing slogan (see “bottling innovation since 1985”), the protection is almost non-existent. Think of how many words are used in a brewery’s lifetime in a marketing statement. There are probably thousands, over 30 years. If a brewery feels that it is part of its brand, it would have protected it. This is especially true when the brewery is adept at filing for trademarks, such as Bell's. That was not the case here. Like Bell's would do, we searched far and wide before selecting a brand name. And we are asking for the same protection that they have been afforded 20+ times.

In the early days of this dispute, when we were asked what our brand was worth, we told them a lot. We did not expect that to be used against us as proposing a settlement figure. Our brand was not for sale, and it's not for sale now. We fully believe we can come to an agreement with Bell's, and we will never ask them for compensation. An agreement would let both breweries use our existing brands going forward, because consumers are not likely to be confused.

Bell’s, we just don't think you should have filed it. We believe that it lacks merit, and the impact has been an unfortunate, costly, and lengthy heartache for all. Let’s settle it. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on our most recent coexistence agreement and truly look forward to a resolution."

This is so well said, I need to change my shorts.

 

[bob1852]

I can see Bell's point. They should have trademarked it if they felt so strongly about it, but didn't.

I think, let me repeat, I think.....the issue is Bell's phrase isn't trademarkable. (because it is common language, or whatever the legal term is).

I think, and again, I think, Bell's is worried that if Innovation gets their trademark they could legally make Bell's quit using the slogan they've been using. So Bell's is asking the courts to not approve the Trademark since it may impact Bell's slogan in the future.

At least that's my understanding.

 

[Weezy]

You'd think...but you'd be wrong. Common phrases can be trademarked. Paris Hilton trademarked "That's hot."

 

[treacheroustexan]

Larry Bell messaged me on facebook due to the fact that I created a "Larry Bell is a real dick" t-shirt. End result, I told him I wouldn't print the t-shirts but still called him a dick, told him im boycotting bells until this is settled and told him to let me know when he wants me to come brew a beer with him when this blows over.

 

[lschiavo]

Larry Bell messaged me on facebook due to the fact that I created a "Larry Bell is a real dick" t-shirt. End result, I told him I wouldn't print the t-shirts but still called him a dick, told him im boycotting bells until this is settled and told him to let me know when he wants me to come brew a beer with him when this blows over.

Are you serious, Clark?

 

[treacheroustexan]

Are you serious, Clark?

Yep!

 

[lschiavo]

I wanna see the shirt. Showing it here wouldn't be "printing" it.

 

[treacheroustexan]

I wanna see the shirt. Showing it here wouldn't be "printing" it.

i removed it now, it was just a teespring campaign. It was just a black shirt and the front said "Larry Bell is a real dick!".

 

[Weezy]

Too bad Ohio doesn't have anti-SLAPP laws. Yor tshirt is protected free speech. The anti-SLAPP laws make it difficult for people who'd sue you to win and permits you to collect legal fees for your defense.

 

[Hello]

Am I the only one that heard sad violin music while reading this? Give me a break man. Move out of daddy's basement and learn how the business world works.

What a cute response. Perhaps you should avoid the reply button for a bit since a good portion of this thread alongside various social media outlets exhibit similar sentiments from people who seem to feel the same and clearly that grinds your gears.

Just to note, I am very familiar with how business works and my daddy didn't have a basement.

On topic, I'm still seeing Bell's use "inspired" brewing on all brewery swag around here (towels, signs, stickers, glasses) and not innovation. I understand if the TM is granted then Innovation could force Bell's to stop using the term, but it seems to me they're not using it as much as they use inspired brewing. Perhaps I'm mistaken.

 

[Highside]

Dropped by Innovation on Saturday for a Hops and Robbers IPA, delicious.

 

[kombat]

Dropped by Innovation on Saturday for a Hops and Robbers IPA, delicious.

Ironic.

I wonder if Innovation will try to claim that name, too?

 

[GrogNerd]

interesting...

Innovation and Old Ox both having their trademarks being contested by larger companies

future brewery owners should stay away from naming them "Sully", "Greenway", "Pacific" or "Shaw"

 

[Homercidal]

Next up, a Cowboys and India Pale Ale...