I thought it was a decent overview of the beer selling industry. There was good general information in there regarding distribution, bureaucracy, and the connection between the beer industry and the government. Though I never really felt that it focuses enough on any one thing and remained much too broad in each area. Also the filmmaker herself didn't seem to have much education about the craft BEER...just the craft beer INDUSTRY. And she certainly spends a lot of time beating it over your head that the big guys are really big and the little guys are really little. At some point, ok, I got it (even if I didn't already know - I'm trying to keep in mind someone watching this that doesn't know about every craft brew under the sun), even still...can we not keep going back to that same point with every single segment? It would have been nice to see a bigger segment of the "small guys". Instead it was pretty much all about Dogfish, with a little Stone, New Belgium and Sam Adams thrown in. It was obvious that the filmmaker found their stars with Sam from DFH and Rhonda, the woman trying to establish Moon Shot as a brand. From a storytelling aspect I get it, but as far as a representation of what is going on in the big picture it seems pretty shortsighted.
Also, Moon Shot doesn't belong in the same discussion as true craft brews like DFH and Stone and the guy from Beer Advocate pretty much drove that home in the post-film discussion. It's odd that she chose to cut that out of the final version of the film because that distinction is never made. There is a reason why Jim Koch wouldn't invest in that even though Rhonda is a co founder of Boston Brewing Co. It's kind of odd since Rhonda is a central figure in the film and it's essentially about her trying to sell a "brand" not necessarily a craft beer. She comes of as chasing the American (capitalist) Dream. Totally in it to make a buck on a gimmicky brand of beer. Which is fine in of itself I suppose, but she presents herself as part of the craft beer community. She may have been at one time, but what she is doing now doesn't fit the bill and isn't part of the "movement" happening with American craft brew. I don't have a problem with her trying to establish her brand (a caffeinated beer...marketed like an energy drink/beer with a lame "69" on the label to boot). But she seems to want to have things both ways...or any way in which she can become successful.
Also, Ben Stein was a piss poor choice to moderate. He pretty much sat and played devil's advocate reading questions off of a paper in sort of an accusatory manner. He did more to distract from the discussion than to direct it.
Overall, it's worth a viewing if you are interested in the beer selling world, but my suggestion is to keep in mind the perspective of a BMC drinker when watching it. I think it could open some eyes and taste buds up there...so it's a good thing for craft brew in the long run...if not a two hour commercial for DFH, as Sam comes off like the cool underdog that makes great beer and cares about the people that work for him that he legitimately seems to be.
What it's not is an in depth look at craft beer. It's not like they spend any time discussing characteristics of hops or which Russian Imperial Stout is the most killer brew, etc.
sorry for the ramble....too much to go back an edit and I'm psyched after catching the 3rd period and the quick OT Blackhawks victory over the Flames. It's been a longtime for plyoff hockey in Chicago. But I digress...