• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

BCS vs PID

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

sdsferraro

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Location
Salisbury, MD
Finishing my brew shed this weekend. After email with Ryan from ebrew supply, I am confident in my decision to put a 100A subpanel and construct a 50A system. Ryan says he is very happy with his BCS. What is everyones opinion? What do use/like BCS or PID? What are the pluses and minuses? I am still new to ebrew, but like the consistency it will create and the fact that I can comfortable brew inside without carbon monoxide threat. Thanks ahead of time for your feedback!

Danny
 
I'm having this same battle, so close to pulling the trigger on one or the other at different times. I suppose the pros I see are
Pros: bcs- expandability, control of fermentation and brewing, remote control,cool factor, more control over process and timers
Pid- control of brewing, much cheaper, physical interface
 
The BCS-460 contains 4 temperature inputs and 6 outputs, all of which may be under PID control, PWM, Hysteresis or direct on/off. Right now I have a fermentation chamber using 1 temperature input with 2 outputs under hysteresis control, a RIMS under PID control using 1 temp. input, a boil kettle element under PID control, 2 pumps on direct on/off control and 2 temperature monitoring inputs not controlling any outputs. As far as my control panel goes, I have a push button start switch, a push button stop switch, and an E-stop switch controlling a power contactor. All control and monitoring is done from a web browser on my computer. With 8 programs of 8 steps each in the BCS I can do a complex brew day quite easily.

One advantage of some dedicated PID controls is an autotune function to greatly simplify setting PID parameters. I am using an Auber PID control in a separate project for sous vide cooking, and I find it to be best for single step operations like holding only one temperature or a PWM control.

I am also planning on setting up a PID for a smoker when I find the time. At present I don't know if I will run it from an Auber PID or re-program the BCS and run it from one of the pump outputs when I'm not brewing.

For me it has been best to fit the control to the task, the Auber to a dedicated job and the BCS to a job requiring flexibility.
 
Cost becomes a factor when you use as many PIDs as you would temp probes with the BCS and the BCS is a form of PLC with so many capabilities.
 
Back
Top