doctorRobert said:what the hell does that even mean... you sound like you want to be a beer snob.
I am also confused by this. They are beers by Saugatuck Brewing and Shorts Brewing
doctorRobert said:what the hell does that even mean... you sound like you want to be a beer snob.
Im a beer snob. I honestly think most people would prefer bigger beers if they would only give them a chance.
Then again a lot of people want something cold enough to make their teeth hurt that they can pound for a few hours without getting too wasted.
My brother went to a German restaurant with a clueless BMC buddy. Brother ordered a Becks, buddy didnt have any idea.
Whats the closest you have to Bud Light?
I could bring you a glass of water.
Wynne-R said:I’m a beer snob. I honestly think most people would prefer bigger beers if they would only give them a chance.
Then again a lot of people want something cold enough to make their teeth hurt that they can pound for a few hours without getting too wasted.
My brother went to a German restaurant with a clueless BMC buddy. Brother ordered a Beck’s, buddy didn’t have any idea.
“What’s the closest you have to Bud Light?”
“I could bring you a glass of water.”
On the other hand, your niece invited you to a once-in-a-lifetime social event centered around the public celebration of her new life with her beloved. The refreshments were just the sideshow.
I know I'm in the minority here, but it's my feeling (which is mine) that going outside of the reception to get drinks would be kind of an affront to the hospitality of the hosts.
I guess that's more of an etiquette answer than a beer snobbery answer, and I can't say that I would not have done exactly what you did, but I would feel kind of bad about doing it. Especially if word got back to the hosts.
Im a beer snob. I honestly think most people would prefer bigger beers if they would only give them a chance.
I'm a beer snob. I also don't give a **** if others grief me for it. That's your problem, not mine.
OP: Stop caring about what others think.
On the other hand, your niece invited you to a once-in-a-lifetime social event centered around the public celebration of her new life with her beloved. The refreshments were just the sideshow.
I know I'm in the minority here, but it's my feeling (which is mine) that going outside of the reception to get drinks would be kind of an affront to the hospitality of the hosts.
I guess that's more of an etiquette answer than a beer snobbery answer, and I can't say that I would not have done exactly what you did, but I would feel kind of bad about doing it. Especially if word got back to the hosts.
Would the hosts prefer their guests drink something they don't like?
No. And courtesy dictates that they never know that you'd rather not have what they're offering, so you suck it up.
As Proboscidea said, beer was not the focus. For most people, the only consideration is beer / no beer, and even that is an afterthought. Giving consideration to which kind of beer doesn't even cross most people's minds - especially with all the other choices going into planning a wedding.
Etiquette does not force you to choke down Miller Lite. If you don't like something, you abstain. Surely you can enjoy an evening without your favorite craft beer. Leaving to procure your own option is not proper etiquette, but I don't think most typical hosts would mind. The larger etiquette concern is "abandoning" the celebration...even for a good conversation. The reception isn't about you. It's about the new couple. So good job getting the bartender to let you take stuff upstairs to be there to celebrate with them.
A lot of what goes into civility and courtesy sometimes seems ridiculous. Of course there are those who reject polite conventions. That's a perfectly legit choice with consequences. Some of my favorite people are curmedgeonly rascals who reject convention. But that doesn't change conventional courtesy. Conventional courtesy dictates that a guest graciously accept what he is served and, if he doesn't like it, spare the host that knowledge. One who does otherwise is called an "ingrate", and, often, a "boor". Please note: I recognize that in some circles boorish behavior is fully expected and accepted.
So in your world, courtesy only applies to guests and not the hosts. Got it.
This is why it's a good idea to have a well stocked cash bar in addition to the free beer they chose to provide. That way everyone is happy.
So in your world, courtesy only applies to guests and not the hosts. Got it.
But if you abstain and are known to be a big beer drinker, then the insecure hosts get their feelings hurt.
Laughing... no, appaarently you haven't got it. Don't get me wrong, etiquette isn't at the top of my priority list, but one really has the choice of following the rules or not and accepting the consequences. It's simply denial to suggest that since the rules don't suit you they don't exist.
There are lots of people (myself included) who consider cash bars at weddings to reflect badly on the hosts.
Absolute nonsense. .
There are lots of people (myself included) who consider cash bars at weddings to reflect badly on the hosts.
Where are these so called rules you speak of?
That's why you have both. You have free beer for the mooches who think they deserve free beer and a cash bar for those who are willing to pay for something they enjoy.
Emily Post is a good source:
“The good guest is almost invisible, enjoying him- or herself, communing with fellow guests, and, most of all, enjoying the generous hospitality of the hosts.”
— E. Post