Morrey
Well-Known Member
Some time back, I was challenged to a blind taste test in which a brew club member boldly stated he could brew an English Pale Ale with AG and the same beer with extract and I (we) couldn't tell a difference. The stage was set and I made a post here regarding the upcoming challenge where the varying responses went several pages deep. I was asked to post the results:
Both beers were brewed same date, one full boil volume extract and the other BIAB dunk sparged full volume strike water. Single FV and both racked into keg with set and forget carb. Recipes used same yeast strain from starters, identical hop bill and both brews had same OG. Interesting note is the AG version finished at 1.010 and the DME version finished at 1.012.
6 of us sampled both beers in small flight sized glasses with both at 40F. We evaluated aroma, taste and mouthfeel with closed eyes. Head retention, color, clarity and overall appearance was done visually of course.
The only real criteria was to see if we could pick the AG from the extract. Let me say this guy is an awesome brewer. I'd be proud to serve either of his beers, so please let me say that extract beers are quite capable of being awesome.
The long and short is I could tell the extract was a shade darker than the AG. The extract also gave me a slight hint of what I'll call a "boxed cake mix" flavor but only on the backside or finishing flavor as it lingered. This flavor was not readily detectable on the front end.
But...this is interesting. He poured another small flight as we deliberated and tasted. Then we had a late customer come into the LHBS and kinda held up the show as the owner did a grain bill order with milling. In the meantime the short pours got almost to room temp. THEN, the extract showed itself at 70F. The AG had more depth, character and layers at that temp. The extract seemed more one dimensional and lacked comparable depth. But, this only became much more pronounced as the beers warmed, at 40F it was quite different.
In summary, 5 of 6 experienced homebrewers picked the AG at 40F, then the one guy on the fence changed his mind at 70F. I'm not real sure if this was totally fair to sample a beer at that temp, but it played out that way. Yes, the extract was a very very nice beer especially in the hands of a skilled brewer who knows their stuff. I was totally surprised at how close they fared especially at the serving temp of 40F. In my opinion, extract brewers never need to apologize for sticking with their program. This was well too close of a test which proved to me the point he was making. And that point is to all of us AG brewers...."Don't look down your noses at extract", and he proved his point well.
Both beers were brewed same date, one full boil volume extract and the other BIAB dunk sparged full volume strike water. Single FV and both racked into keg with set and forget carb. Recipes used same yeast strain from starters, identical hop bill and both brews had same OG. Interesting note is the AG version finished at 1.010 and the DME version finished at 1.012.
6 of us sampled both beers in small flight sized glasses with both at 40F. We evaluated aroma, taste and mouthfeel with closed eyes. Head retention, color, clarity and overall appearance was done visually of course.
The only real criteria was to see if we could pick the AG from the extract. Let me say this guy is an awesome brewer. I'd be proud to serve either of his beers, so please let me say that extract beers are quite capable of being awesome.
The long and short is I could tell the extract was a shade darker than the AG. The extract also gave me a slight hint of what I'll call a "boxed cake mix" flavor but only on the backside or finishing flavor as it lingered. This flavor was not readily detectable on the front end.
But...this is interesting. He poured another small flight as we deliberated and tasted. Then we had a late customer come into the LHBS and kinda held up the show as the owner did a grain bill order with milling. In the meantime the short pours got almost to room temp. THEN, the extract showed itself at 70F. The AG had more depth, character and layers at that temp. The extract seemed more one dimensional and lacked comparable depth. But, this only became much more pronounced as the beers warmed, at 40F it was quite different.
In summary, 5 of 6 experienced homebrewers picked the AG at 40F, then the one guy on the fence changed his mind at 70F. I'm not real sure if this was totally fair to sample a beer at that temp, but it played out that way. Yes, the extract was a very very nice beer especially in the hands of a skilled brewer who knows their stuff. I was totally surprised at how close they fared especially at the serving temp of 40F. In my opinion, extract brewers never need to apologize for sticking with their program. This was well too close of a test which proved to me the point he was making. And that point is to all of us AG brewers...."Don't look down your noses at extract", and he proved his point well.