I thought it might be worth sharing a bit of interesting information I have stumbled across.
I have posted recently about my poor apple crop and the need to buy in some juice to blend. The juice arrived and after doing the usual SG, pH, TA stuff, I noticed that the Fuji juice nutritional information seemed to be a bit odd (51 g/L sugar out of135 g/L total carbohydrates). The information for the other juices was more normal at twice the ratio (110 g/L sugar out of 130 g/L total carbohydrates. The SG for all juices was "normal" at around 1.050.
Sugar is what we ferment into alcohol and CO2, so 51g/L (25 g of alcohol or 3% ABV) didn’t sound like much sugar, whereas the typical 110g/L sugar should result in something like 6.5%ABV.
So, I sent off a query to the orchard and this is part of the interesting reply…
When we had the testing done for our labels we noticed the large difference between Fuji and the other varieties so we sent a sample to another lab and got the same result!
We did a bit of research and although no-one has looked at this specifically what we have found is:
Certainly, a bit of Dr Google research supports the view in that “Sorbitol correlates to sweetness better than other sugars”. Another interesting point about Fuji apples is that they are prone to “watercore” and that “apples with watercore have high levels of the sugar sorbitol in the intercellular space”.
So, I guess the reason for posting this is that it seems if Fuji apples are included in a cider blend, the alcohol produced from the Fuji might be lower than normal, but the non-fermentable sweeteners will be quite high.
Sweet, lower alcohol cider without the need to pasteurise, or something like fully ferment, and bottle with priming sugar for a sweet carbonated cider, etc, etc, perhaps?
Over to anyone who wants to play with this.
Cheers!
I have posted recently about my poor apple crop and the need to buy in some juice to blend. The juice arrived and after doing the usual SG, pH, TA stuff, I noticed that the Fuji juice nutritional information seemed to be a bit odd (51 g/L sugar out of135 g/L total carbohydrates). The information for the other juices was more normal at twice the ratio (110 g/L sugar out of 130 g/L total carbohydrates. The SG for all juices was "normal" at around 1.050.
Sugar is what we ferment into alcohol and CO2, so 51g/L (25 g of alcohol or 3% ABV) didn’t sound like much sugar, whereas the typical 110g/L sugar should result in something like 6.5%ABV.
So, I sent off a query to the orchard and this is part of the interesting reply…
When we had the testing done for our labels we noticed the large difference between Fuji and the other varieties so we sent a sample to another lab and got the same result!
We did a bit of research and although no-one has looked at this specifically what we have found is:
- The Total Carbohydrates in fuji juice are the same as other juices,
- The sugar on nutritional panels doesn't measure sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, xylitol and mannitol; these are reflected in the Total Carbohydrates,
- Fuji is perceived to be one of the sweeter apples and studies show that higher sorbitol content correlates to higher perceived sweetness more than a higher total sugar content.
- Brix is a measurement that does include the sugar alcohols
- the Brix measurement is high (it measures the sugar alcohols as well as the sugar)
- the sugar measurement is low
Certainly, a bit of Dr Google research supports the view in that “Sorbitol correlates to sweetness better than other sugars”. Another interesting point about Fuji apples is that they are prone to “watercore” and that “apples with watercore have high levels of the sugar sorbitol in the intercellular space”.
So, I guess the reason for posting this is that it seems if Fuji apples are included in a cider blend, the alcohol produced from the Fuji might be lower than normal, but the non-fermentable sweeteners will be quite high.
Sweet, lower alcohol cider without the need to pasteurise, or something like fully ferment, and bottle with priming sugar for a sweet carbonated cider, etc, etc, perhaps?
Over to anyone who wants to play with this.
Cheers!