mordantly
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,863
- Reaction score
- 16
it loosely works. the person who copped it, doesn't have a value for said item. it was free.
it loosely works. the person who copped it, doesn't have a value for said item. it was free.
well if you got something free, how can you estimate a price? especially if you trade it for a bag of chips. that is clearly assigning a value of $3.
by the way. in english, in means not, so technicaly it should mean not valuable. however that is not the case.
The prefix "in" more often than not means "very", as it does in this case. See "inflammable". You make a common mistake: You confuse "in" with "un". Correct this oversight.
Just to join in the busting... you're wrong there. the prefex "in" means "not". But in this case, it's "not able to be given a value", as in it's so precious that you could never put a price on it. Invaluable. In means "not", not "very".
In ALL the threads to start a discussion on spelling or grammar...this one?!?!!
:cross:
It brings a tear to my eyes. Or is that eyez.Ah, but Shecky would be proud!
This thread needs some Maru. . . . :rockin:
Not a kitteh, but it has to go somewhere.
That's pretty awesome. I've seen some UFC fights that look like that. I was just waiting for one of them kittehs to tap out.
I must admit...I don't get it
these are horrible
Enter your email address to join: