I believe this is true, but it needs to be understood in context. Your body gets minerals from many sources; the food your eat, any supplements you take, the beer you drink, etc, etc. According to WHO (leaving further discussion of their value to the political threads), RO water can be problematic if that is the only water you drink and you are mineral deficient in your diet or for other health reasons. I also noticed that some companies who sell alternatives to RO systems used the WHO report to bash RO making it even hard to get an accurate picture. Maybe some of the RO folks on this site could weigh in.As the water completely lack any minerals it will absorb the minerals in your body until some equalibruim is achieved and then are flushed out of your body.
I drink RO water at home and have for the last couple of decades. I don't have the science behind this, but my feeling is I do less damage drinking RO then drinking the trace amounts of chemicals and contaminants not removed by my local water utility. It's a trade off. In some cities this may not be true, but I used to live in a rural area and only had well water. It was not good for drinking without some treatment.
Also, adding trace minerals is easy. A jar is pretty inexpensive and last quite a while. I do this regularly. A couple shakes in a glass and I've got clean water with a good amount of clean minerals.
Do your homework, lots of info for and against out there. I'll go with all things in moderation and hope for the best.
Last edited: