• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

What book is on your nightstand? Readers!

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Do you mix audibles and written books? Simultaneously?
Never the same book, but yes. I read some on audible, and some on my kindle. I save the more technical books for the Kindle usually. I keep 1 audio going, and 1-2 on the Kindle. I don't read physical books anymore, my vision is not so good and I hate trying to hunt down hard backs.
 
Here are my top 20 favorite books that I read in 2022.
I've included a link at the bottom to all 58 of my books from 2022 on goodreads.com if anybody is interested.

Many of these books I have re-read several times. Usually when a new book in a series comes out,
if it has been a few years since the last, I will re-read the series from the beginning before reading the new book.

Cold Mountain by Charles Frazier The Reluctant Adventures of Fletcher Connolly on the Interste... by Felix R. Savage One Good Deed by David Baldacci Timeline by Michael Crichton The Broken Room by Peter Clines Match Game by Craig Alanson We Are Legion (We Are Bob) by Dennis E. Taylor For We Are Many by Dennis E. Taylor Heaven's River by Dennis E. Taylor's River by Dennis E. Taylor

14 by Peter Clines The Fold by Peter Clines Rhythm of War by Brandon Sanderson Fairy Tale by Stephen King Lost in Time by A.G. Riddle Dream Town by David Baldacci The Whisper Man by Alex North Desert Star by Michael Connelly The Lost Metal by Brandon Sanderson Failure Mode by Craig Alanson Renegade Star by J.N. Chaney


Major’s Year in Books - 2022

My goodreads.com profile page.
I see you found the hidden sequel for 14, I've been wanting to read that for a while.
 
Never the same book, but yes. I read some on audible, and some on my kindle. I save the more technical books for the Kindle usually. I keep 1 audio going, and 1-2 on the Kindle. I don't read physical books anymore, my vision is not so good and I hate trying to hunt down hard backs.
I'm almost identical. I use audibles for driving/biking/walking time, and kindle in house. I do occasionally read a paper copy if given one, but rarely buy them. Technical books that I need to highlight and refer to often are paper.
 
I see you found the hidden sequel for 14, I've been wanting to read that for a while.

Yep, after I read Peter Clines "The Broken Room" and realized that one of the characters in it was from "14" I went back and listened to "14", "The Fold", and "Terminus" again.
 
Just finished this one. I've read lots of post-apocalypse books and this one was very good. It really went into the daily survival details that many of them don't. Salt! And wasn't as dark and awful as some (The Road, which I loved haha).

https://www.amazon.com/Alas-Babylon...swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1676595560&sr=8-1
1676595615034.png
 
I liked this book. Read it probably 10 years ago.

I really, really liked The Road. Relentlessly bleak.

Just finished this one. I've read lots of post-apocalypse books and this one was very good. It really went into the daily survival details that many of them don't. Salt! And wasn't as dark and awful as some (The Road, which I loved haha).
 
Currently about 50 pages into War & Peace
Stop now. It sucks.

Otherwise you're gonna be 600 pages in, hating it but feeling like you have to finish it out else you're admitting defeat. And so you'll finish it and realize it never actually got better or had a payoff.

Ask me how I know.
 
Currently about 50 pages into War & Peace

Otherwise you're gonna be 600 pages in, hating it but feeling like you have to finish it out else you're admitting defeat. And so you'll finish it and realize it never actually got better or had a payoff.

I tend to agree, I never actually finished this book. I quit reading it when I reached the essays on war towards the end.
 
Last edited:
I honestly think that War & Peace is just a cruel joke played by sadistic English professors, and their students think that if a prof is assigning a 1000+ page tome of Russian Literature that there just MUST be something profound in there if only they try harder to understand it.

When it actuality it's just a fatalistic diary encompassing the mundane happenings of Russian aristocracy during wartime.
 
I read that (maybe twice haha). GREAT! Of course, the whole time you'll picture Jack as the main character.

Yep. I did that, even though I didn't watch the movie until after I had read it. I just knew enough about the movie that I couldn't see anyone but Jack when I read it.
 
Having finally finished a comparison between the Book of Genesis as presented in the Bible vs a mush older version written in cuneiform by the Assyrians, I'm reading something a little lighter now: Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
Book by Yuval Noah Harari
 
Having finally finished a comparison between the Book of Genesis as presented in the Bible vs a mush older version written in cuneiform by the Assyrians, I'm reading something a little lighter now: Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
Book by Yuval Noah Harari
IIRC, you'll find that religion also plays a big part in your new book choice. Formation of society was dependent on it.
 
I honestly think that War & Peace is just a cruel joke played by sadistic English professors, and their students think that if a prof is assigning a 1000+ page tome of Russian Literature that there just MUST be something profound in there if only they try harder to understand it.

When it actuality it's just a fatalistic diary encompassing the mundane happenings of Russian aristocracy during wartime.

I went through this internal struggle with Atlas Shrugged. I made it to the end, and no one gave me a trophy. I often wonder how these books got so damn popular in the first place. Do people just "pretend" to get it because they didn't get it? I'm not sure length is a factor either, The Great Gatsby has basically no point at all, and very little plot or action.
 
As for my own reading, I read this on a suggestion from a coworker, and really enjoyed it.
41SV07xgbNL._SY346_.jpg


I recently read "Super Powereds: Year 1" by Drew Hayes book, and it far exceeded my expectations. I'm not really into the super hero thing, so I went into it with little hope. I will definitely be reading the rest of the series.

Most of my reading time has been spent on studying for CCNA. The company I work for allows us to cross train in basically anything, and I've learned that being a programmer does not automatically make you good at networking. Good thing I love technical books.
51kMtpaJQNL._SX395_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
I went through this internal struggle with Atlas Shrugged. I made it to the end, and no one gave me a trophy. I often wonder how these books got so damn popular in the first place. Do people just "pretend" to get it because they didn't get it? I'm not sure length is a factor either, The Great Gatsby has basically no point at all, and very little plot or action.

I consider Atlas Shrugged to be in an entirely different category.

It's not particularly well written. The characters are wooden caricatures of ideologies. There's a ~60 page (!) monologue. It's a philosophical treatise dressed up as a novel. It could be half the length and still MORE than effectively get the points across.

However, Atlas has a plot, and it has a point. There is a central conflict in the book. It builds to that conflict and a resolution.

War & Peace seems to not really have a plot, or a central conflict that the characters must resolve, or a point. It just reads like a bunch of things people did.
 
Les Miserables. In the unabridged translation I read, you meet Valjean on p106 after having read all about the priest's home economics. You know, the priest that gives Valjean the candlesticks in the first 2m of the musical. Then there's the long essay on slang before you get to the introduction of Gavroche. Also, the very lengthy narrative of the Battle of Waterloo that introduces Thenardier.

19th century novelists weren't too concerned with getting right to the point. Especially when they were published serially, like W&P.
 
I went through this internal struggle with Atlas Shrugged. I made it to the end, and no one gave me a trophy. I often wonder how these books got so damn popular in the first place. Do people just "pretend" to get it because they didn't get it?

I liked it enough to have read it twice haha. So yes, some people do dig it. I suppose you're not inclined to continue with Rand, but I also really liked The Fountainhead.

As for my own reading, I read this on a suggestion from a coworker, and really enjoyed it.
41SV07xgbNL._SY346_.jpg
I started that one years ago. I believe I abandoned it early - too depressing.

I consider Atlas Shrugged to be in an entirely different category.

It's not particularly well written. The characters are wooden caricatures of ideologies. There's a ~60 page (!) monologue. It's a philosophical treatise dressed up as a novel. It could be half the length and still MORE than effectively get the points across.

However, Atlas has a plot, and it has a point. There is a central conflict in the book. It builds to that conflict and a resolution.
Spot on. It's a book written for idealogues I guess. I really liked all the characters in Atlas. Dagney was a bit weird, but I'm sure Rand patterned her after her own heroic image of herself. I loved the mystery of the $ cigarettes, disappearing barons of industry, the attack on the looters of the world, the "invention", and the finale.

Les Miserables. In the unabridged translation I read, you meet Valjean on p106 after having read all about the priest's home economics. You know, the priest that gives Valjean the candlesticks in the first 2m of the musical. Then there's the long essay on slang before you get to the introduction of Gavroche. Also, the very lengthy narrative of the Battle of Waterloo that introduces Thenardier.

19th century novelists weren't too concerned with getting right to the point. Especially when they were published serially, like W&P.
Was forced to first read this in (catholic) high school. Turns out I loved it. I used to read a lot of long, rambling books back when the world seemed a lot slower. Read it a second time after seeing the broadway show (which is my favorite!). I might have skipped some of the essays in my second reading!

And it could very well be be responsible for the destruction of society.

Well I dunno, if the crusades didn't do it... I'm agnostic, no dog in this fight, but it seems to me that religion is a net positive in holding society together. I'm afraid that conversation is better done in the dark stanky bowels of this forum (debate).
 
Back
Top